Suppr超能文献

安全驾驶行为测量的同时效效标效度:对道路驾驶结果的预测。

Concurrent criterion validity of the safe driving behavior measure: a predictor of on-road driving outcomes.

机构信息

Institute for Mobility, Activity and Participation, and Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, PO Box 100164, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.

出版信息

Am J Occup Ther. 2013 Jan-Feb;67(1):108-16. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2013.005116.

Abstract

We determined the concurrent criterion validity of the Safe Driving Behavior Measure (SDBM) for on-road outcomes (passing or failing the on-road test as determined by a certified driving rehabilitation specialist) among older drivers and their family members-caregivers. On the basis of ratings from 168 older drivers and 168 family members-caregivers, we calculated receiver operating characteristic curves. The drivers' area under the curve (AUC) was .620 (95% confidence interval [CI] = .514-.725, p = .043). The family members-caregivers' AUC was .726 (95% CI = .622-.829, p ≤ .01). Older drivers' ratings showed statistically significant yet poor concurrent criterion validity, but family members-caregivers' ratings showed good concurrent criterion validity for the criterion on-road driving test. Continuing research with a more representative sample is being pursued to confirm the SDBM's concurrent criterion validity. This screening tool may be useful for generalist practitioners to use in making decisions regarding driving.

摘要

我们确定了安全驾驶行为量表(SDBM)在老年驾驶员及其家庭成员-护理者的道路测试结果(由认证驾驶康复专家确定的通过或失败)中的同时效标准效度。根据 168 名老年驾驶员和 168 名家庭成员-护理者的评分,我们计算了接收者操作特征曲线。驾驶员的曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.620(95%置信区间[CI]为 0.514-0.725,p=0.043)。家庭成员-护理者的 AUC 为 0.726(95%CI为 0.622-0.829,p≤0.01)。驾驶员的评分显示出具有统计学意义但较差的同时效标准效度,但家庭成员-护理者的评分对道路驾驶测试的标准具有良好的同时效标准效度。正在进行更多具有代表性的样本的进一步研究,以确认 SDBM 的同时效标准效度。该筛选工具可能对全科医生在做出与驾驶相关的决策时有用。

相似文献

1
Concurrent criterion validity of the safe driving behavior measure: a predictor of on-road driving outcomes.
Am J Occup Ther. 2013 Jan-Feb;67(1):108-16. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2013.005116.
2
Psychometrics of the Fitness-to-Drive Screening Measure.
OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2015 Jan;35(1):42-52. doi: 10.1177/1539449214561761.
3
Rater reliability and rater effects of the Safe Driving Behavior Measure.
Am J Occup Ther. 2012 Jan-Feb;66(1):69-77. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2012.002261.
4
The Concurrent Criterion Validity of the 32-Item Fitness-to-Drive Screening Measure.
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 14;10:253. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00253. eCollection 2019.
5
How effective is the Trail Making Test (Parts A and B) in identifying cognitively impaired drivers?
Age Ageing. 2013 Sep;42(5):577-81. doi: 10.1093/ageing/aft073. Epub 2013 Jul 28.
6
MMSE as a predictor of on-road driving performance in community dwelling older drivers.
Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Nov;49:287-92. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.02.003. Epub 2012 Mar 2.
7
Validation of Brief Screening Tools to Identify Impaired Driving Among Older Adults in Australia.
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e208263. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8263.
8
Validity and critical driving errors of on-road assessment for older drivers.
Am J Occup Ther. 2010 Mar-Apr;64(2):242-51. doi: 10.5014/ajot.64.2.242.
10
Item development and validity testing for a self- and proxy report: the safe driving behavior measure.
Am J Occup Ther. 2010 Mar-Apr;64(2):296-305. doi: 10.5014/ajot.64.2.296.

引用本文的文献

1
Does a Concise Patient-reported Outcome Measure Provide a Valid Measure of Physical Function for Cancer Patients After Lower Extremity Surgery?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):62-75. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003257. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
3
Validation of Malayalam Version of Everyday Abilities Scale for India.
Indian J Psychol Med. 2021 Jul;43(4):325-329. doi: 10.1177/0253717620973419. Epub 2020 Dec 19.
5
Further Insights Into the Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS): Unidimensionality Among Psychiatric Inpatients.
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jul 31;11:727. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00727. eCollection 2020.
6
The Concurrent Criterion Validity of the 32-Item Fitness-to-Drive Screening Measure.
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 14;10:253. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00253. eCollection 2019.
7
Construction and Validation of the 21 Item Fitness-to-Drive Screening Measure Short-Form.
Front Public Health. 2018 Dec 6;6:339. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00339. eCollection 2018.
8
Validating a Drug-Related Problems Classification System in Outpatient Setting in Iran.
J Res Pharm Pract. 2018 Jul-Sep;7(3):117-122. doi: 10.4103/jrpp.JRPP_18_17.
9
Prediction of Fitness to Drive in Patients with Alzheimer's Dementia.
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 24;11(2):e0149566. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149566. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychometrics of the self-report safe driving behavior measure for older adults.
Am J Occup Ther. 2012 Mar-Apr;66(2):233-41. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2012.001834.
2
Rater reliability and rater effects of the Safe Driving Behavior Measure.
Am J Occup Ther. 2012 Jan-Feb;66(1):69-77. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2012.002261.
3
Focus group findings for the self-report safe driving behaviour measure.
Can J Occup Ther. 2011 Apr;78(2):72-9. doi: 10.2182/cjot.2011.78.2.2.
4
Declines in fatal crashes of older drivers: changes in crash risk and survivability.
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 May;43(3):666-74. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.10.010. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
5
Item development and validity testing for a self- and proxy report: the safe driving behavior measure.
Am J Occup Ther. 2010 Mar-Apr;64(2):296-305. doi: 10.5014/ajot.64.2.296.
6
Driving Retirement in Older Adults with Dementia.
Top Geriatr Rehabil. 2009 Apr 1;25(2):154-162. doi: 10.1097/TGR.0b013e3181a103fd.
8
Comparison of driving errors between on-the-road and simulated driving assessment: a validation study.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2009 Aug;10(4):379-85. doi: 10.1080/15389580902894989.
9
Predictability of clinical assessments for driving performance.
J Safety Res. 2008;39(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2007.10.004. Epub 2008 Jan 4.
10
What's under the ROC? An introduction to receiver operating characteristics curves.
Can J Psychiatry. 2007 Feb;52(2):121-8. doi: 10.1177/070674370705200210.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验