建立有用视野评估和中风驱动因素筛查评估的标准效度：与道路评估结果的比较。
Establishing criterion validity of the Useful Field of View assessment and Stroke Drivers' Screening Assessment: comparison to the result of on-road assessment.
机构信息
Flinders University, Department of Rehabilitation and Aged Care, Repatriation General Hospital, Daws Road, Daw Park, South Australia 5041, Australia.
出版信息
Am J Occup Ther. 2010 Jan-Feb;64(1):114-22. doi: 10.5014/ajot.64.1.114.
OBJECTIVES
We sought to determine the criterion validity of the Useful Field of View (UFOV) assessment and Stroke Drivers' Screening Assessment (SDSA) through comparison to the results of on-road assessment.
METHOD
This was a prospective study with people with stroke. Outcome measures used were UFOV, SDSA, and the results of on-road assessment.
RESULTS
Both the results on UFOV (Divided Attention subtest, p<.01; Selective Attention subtest, p<.05) and SDSA (p<.05) were significantly related to the recommendation from on-road assessment. The Divided Attention subtest of the UFOV had the highest sensitivity value (88.9%).
CONCLUSIONS
UFOV and SDSA are valid assessments of driving ability for stroke. The Divided Attention subtest of the UFOV can guide decision making of occupational therapists in stroke driver rehabilitation and in determining those who require further assessment on road because they pose a safety risk. Screening assists people with stroke to decide whether they are ready to have an on-road assessment.
目的
通过与路测结果进行比较，确定视野测试（UFOV）和脑卒中驾驶员筛查评估（SDSA）的效标效度。
方法
这是一项针对脑卒中患者的前瞻性研究。使用的结果评估包括 UFOV、SDSA 和路测结果。
结果
UFOV 的结果（注意力分散测试，p<.01；选择性注意测试，p<.05）和 SDSA（p<.05）均与路测评估的建议显著相关。UFOV 的注意力分散测试具有最高的灵敏度值（88.9%）。
结论
UFOV 和 SDSA 是脑卒中患者驾驶能力的有效评估方法。UFOV 的注意力分散测试可指导职业治疗师在脑卒中患者驾驶员康复中做出决策，并确定那些因存在安全风险而需要进一步路测评估的患者。筛查可帮助脑卒中患者决定是否准备进行路测评估。
Zotero 插件