Suppr超能文献

颈椎内窥镜下椎间孔切开减压术的临床疗效。

Clinical outcomes of microendoscopic foraminotomy and decompression in the cervical spine.

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2014 Feb;81(2):422-7. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2012.12.008. Epub 2012 Dec 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Few reports have addressed long-term outcomes, as well as the safety and efficacy of the cervical microendoscopic foraminotomy (CMEF) and cervical microendoscopic diskectomy (CMED) procedures used in modern spine practice to treat degenerative disease of the cervical spine. Accordingly, we present long-term outcomes from a cohort of patients treated for foraminal stenosis or disk herniation with the CMEF or CMED procedure, respectively.

METHODS

A total of 38 patients were included in the study, with a mean follow-up of 24.47 ± 12.84 months. Patients were monitored prospectively with questionnaires consisting of a visual analog scale for the neck (VASN) and arm (VASA), and a neck disability index (NDI) form. Operative time, estimated blood loss, and hospitalization stay also were collected. Data were analyzed with Microsoft Office Excel 2007.

RESULTS

The mean 1 year follow-up scores all showed statistically significant improvements: NDI (P = 0.0019), VASN (P = 0.0017), VASA (P ≤ 0.0001). Similar results were seen at 2-year follow-up: NDI (P = 0.0011), VASN (P = 0.0022), and VASA (P ≤ 0.0001); and at 3- to 6-year follow-up: NDI (P = 0.0015), VASN (P = 0.0200), and VASA (P = 0.0034). The average operation time, hospitalization stay, and estimated blood loss were 154.27 ± 26.79 minutes, 21.22 ± 14.23 hours, and 27.92 mL, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences when patients were compared by age (over 50 vs. under 50), operative level (above C6 vs. below C6), or sex. One complication was reported in this study consisting of duratomy, which required no further intervention.

CONCLUSION

Posterior CMEF and CMED are safe and effective procedures for minimally invasive decompression in the cervical spine.

摘要

目的

鲜有研究报告长期结果以及现代脊柱实践中用于治疗颈椎退行性疾病的颈椎显微内窥镜下椎间孔切开术(CMEF)和颈椎显微内窥镜下椎间盘切除术(CMED)的安全性和疗效。因此,我们报告了一组分别采用 CMEF 或 CMED 手术治疗椎间孔狭窄或椎间盘突出症患者的长期结果。

方法

共有 38 例患者纳入研究,平均随访 24.47±12.84 个月。前瞻性监测患者采用包括颈部视觉模拟评分(VASN)和手臂 VAS(VASA)以及颈部残疾指数(NDI)的问卷。还收集了手术时间、估计失血量和住院时间。数据使用 Microsoft Office Excel 2007 进行分析。

结果

1 年随访的平均评分均显示出统计学显著改善:NDI(P=0.0019)、VASN(P=0.0017)、VASA(P≤0.0001)。2 年随访时也出现了类似的结果:NDI(P=0.0011)、VASN(P=0.0022)和 VASA(P≤0.0001);3 至 6 年随访时:NDI(P=0.0015)、VASN(P=0.0200)和 VASA(P=0.0034)。平均手术时间、住院时间和估计失血量分别为 154.27±26.79 分钟、21.22±14.23 小时和 27.92 mL。当按年龄(>50 岁与<50 岁)、手术水平(C6 以上与 C6 以下)或性别比较患者时,无统计学差异。本研究报告了一例并发症,即硬脊膜切开术,无需进一步干预。

结论

颈椎后路 CMEF 和 CMED 是颈椎微创减压的安全有效方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验