• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结肠镜检查后 1 年进展性结直肠腺瘤的风险:美国与英国风险分层指南。

One-year risk for advanced colorectal neoplasia: U.S. versus U.K. risk-stratification guidelines.

机构信息

Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, 3855 Health Sciences Drive 0901, La Jolla, CA 92093-0901, USA.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2012 Dec 18;157(12):856-64. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-12-201212180-00005.

DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-157-12-201212180-00005
PMID:23247939
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3787691/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Guidelines from the United Kingdom and the United States on risk stratification after polypectomy differ, as do recommended surveillance intervals.

OBJECTIVE

To compare risk for advanced colorectal neoplasia at 1-year colonoscopy among patients cross-classified by U.S. and U.K. surveillance guidelines.

DESIGN

Pooled analysis of 4 prospective studies between 1984 and 1998.

SETTING

Academic and private clinics in the United States.

PATIENTS

3226 postpolypectomy patients with 6- to 18-month follow-up colonoscopy.

MEASUREMENTS

Rates of advanced neoplasia (an adenoma ≥1 cm, high-grade dysplasia, >25% villous architecture, or invasive cancer) at 1 year, compared across U.S. and U.K. risk categories.

RESULTS

Advanced neoplasia was detected 1 year after polypectomy in 3.8% (95% CI, 2.7% to 4.9%) of lower-risk patients and 11.2% (CI, 9.8% to 12.6%) of higher-risk patients by U.S. criteria. According to U.K. criteria, 4.4% (CI, 3.3% to 5.4%) of low-risk patients, 9.9% (CI, 8.3% to 11.5%) of intermediate-risk patients, and 18.7% (CI, 14.8% to 22.5%) of high-risk patients presented with advanced neoplasia; U.K. high-risk patients comprised 12.1% of all patients. All U.S. lower-risk patients were low-risk by U.K. criteria; however, more patients were classified as low-risk, because the U.K. guidelines do not consider histologic features. Higher-risk U.S. patients were distributed across the 3 U.K. categories. Among all patients with advanced neoplasia, 26.3% were reclassified by the U.K. criteria to a higher-risk category and 7.0% to a lower-risk category, with a net 19.0% benefiting from detection 2 years earlier. Overall, substitution of U.K. for U.S. guidelines resulted in an estimated 0.03 additional colonoscopy every 5 years per patient.

LIMITATIONS

Patients were enrolled 15 to 20 years ago, and quality measures for colonoscopy were unavailable. Patients lacking follow-up colonoscopy or with surveillance colonoscopy after 6 to 18 months and those with cancer or insufficient baseline adenoma characteristics were excluded (2076 of 5302).

CONCLUSION

Application of the U.K. guidelines in the United States could identify a subset of high-risk patients who may warrant a 1-year clearing colonoscopy without substantially increasing rates of colonoscopy.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

European Union Public Health Programme.

摘要

背景

英国和美国的息肉切除术后风险分层指南不同,建议的监测间隔也不同。

目的

比较美国和英国监测指南交叉分类的患者在 1 年结肠镜检查时发生晚期结直肠腺瘤的风险。

设计

1984 年至 1998 年期间进行的 4 项前瞻性研究的汇总分析。

地点

美国的学术和私人诊所。

患者

3226 例息肉切除术后 6 至 18 个月随访结肠镜检查的患者。

测量

比较美国和英国风险类别中 1 年时高级别腺瘤(≥1cm 腺瘤、高级别异型增生、>25%绒毛状结构或浸润性癌)的发生率。

结果

根据美国标准,3.8%(95%CI,2.7%至 4.9%)的低危患者和 11.2%(CI,9.8%至 12.6%)的高危患者在息肉切除术后 1 年发现高级别腺瘤。根据英国标准,4.4%(CI,3.3%至 5.4%)的低危患者、9.9%(CI,8.3%至 11.5%)的中危患者和 18.7%(CI,14.8%至 22.5%)的高危患者出现高级别腺瘤;英国高危患者占所有患者的 12.1%。所有美国低危患者均为英国低危标准,但更多患者被归类为低危,因为英国指南不考虑组织学特征。美国高危患者分布在 3 个英国类别中。所有患有高级别腺瘤的患者中,26.3%根据英国标准重新分类为高危类别,7.0%重新分类为低危类别,有 19.0%的患者受益于 2 年前更早的检测。总体而言,用英国指南替代美国指南,估计每位患者每 5 年多进行 0.03 次结肠镜检查。

局限性

患者于 15 至 20 年前入组,结肠镜检查质量指标不可用。排除了未接受随访结肠镜检查或在 6 至 18 个月后接受监测结肠镜检查的患者,以及患有癌症或基线腺瘤特征不足的患者(5302 例中的 2076 例)。

结论

在英国应用指南可能会发现一组高危患者,他们可能需要在 1 年内进行清除性结肠镜检查,而不会显著增加结肠镜检查的比例。

主要资金来源

欧盟公共卫生计划。

相似文献

1
One-year risk for advanced colorectal neoplasia: U.S. versus U.K. risk-stratification guidelines.结肠镜检查后 1 年进展性结直肠腺瘤的风险:美国与英国风险分层指南。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Dec 18;157(12):856-64. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-12-201212180-00005.
2
Risk of advanced lesions at first follow-up colonoscopy in high-risk groups as defined by the United Kingdom post-polypectomy surveillance guideline: data from a single U.S. center.英国息肉切除术后监测指南定义的高危人群在首次随访结肠镜检查时出现高级别病变的风险:来自美国单中心的数据。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Aug;80(2):299-306. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.02.1029. Epub 2014 May 3.
3
Five-year risk for advanced colorectal neoplasia after initial colonoscopy according to the baseline risk stratification: a prospective study in 2452 asymptomatic Koreans.根据基线风险分层,首次结肠镜检查后进展性结直肠腺瘤的 5 年风险:2452 例无症状韩国人的前瞻性研究。
Gut. 2011 Nov;60(11):1537-43. doi: 10.1136/gut.2010.232876. Epub 2011 Mar 22.
4
Risk of advanced colorectal neoplasm by the proposed combined United States and United Kingdom risk stratification guidelines.按美国和英国联合提出的风险分层指南评估结直肠进展性腺瘤的风险。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Mar;87(3):800-808. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.09.023. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
5
Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society.息肉切除术后结肠镜监测指南:美国结直肠癌多学会特别工作组和美国癌症协会的共识更新
CA Cancer J Clin. 2006 May-Jun;56(3):143-59; quiz 184-5. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.56.3.143.
6
Baseline Colonoscopy Findings Associated With 10-Year Outcomes in a Screening Cohort Undergoing Colonoscopy Surveillance.基线结肠镜检查结果与结肠镜筛查监测队列中 10 年结局的相关性。
Gastroenterology. 2020 Mar;158(4):862-874.e8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.07.052. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
7
A pooled analysis of advanced colorectal neoplasia diagnoses after colonoscopic polypectomy.结肠镜息肉切除术后晚期结直肠肿瘤诊断的汇总分析。
Gastroenterology. 2009 Mar;136(3):832-41. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.12.007. Epub 2008 Dec 9.
8
Postpolypectomy colonoscopy surveillance guidelines: predictive accuracy for advanced adenoma at 4 years.息肉切除术后结肠镜监测指南:4年时高级别腺瘤的预测准确性
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Mar 18;148(6):419-26. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-6-200803180-00004.
9
Five-year colon surveillance after screening colonoscopy.结肠镜筛查后的五年结肠监测。
Gastroenterology. 2007 Oct;133(4):1077-85. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.07.006.
10
Colonoscopy surveillance following adenoma removal to reduce the risk of colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.腺瘤切除术后结肠镜随访以降低结直肠癌风险:一项回顾性队列研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 May;26(26):1-156. doi: 10.3310/OLUE3796.

引用本文的文献

1
Surveillance and Surgical Salvage Treatment for Endoscopically Removed T1 Colorectal Cancers.内镜切除的T1期结直肠癌的监测与手术挽救治疗
Gut Liver. 2025 Jul 15;19(4):508-518. doi: 10.5009/gnl240460. Epub 2025 Jun 20.
2
Projected Impact and Cost-Effectiveness of Novel Molecular Blood-Based or Stool-Based Screening Tests for Colorectal Cancer.新型基于血液或粪便的分子结直肠癌筛查检测的预期影响和成本效益
Ann Intern Med. 2024 Dec;177(12):1610-1620. doi: 10.7326/ANNALS-24-00910. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
3
Comparative Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening With Blood-Based Biomarkers (Liquid Biopsy) vs Fecal Tests or Colonoscopy.基于血液生物标志物(液体活检)的结直肠癌筛查与粪便检测或结肠镜检查的比较有效性和成本效益。
Gastroenterology. 2024 Jul;167(2):378-391. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.03.011. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
4
Prevalence of colonoscopy in Japan using a large-scale health claims data compared to esophagogastroduodenoscopy.与食管胃十二指肠镜检查相比,使用大规模健康索赔数据在日本进行结肠镜检查的流行率。
J Gastroenterol. 2024 Jun;59(6):457-467. doi: 10.1007/s00535-024-02087-x. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
5
British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland/Public Health England post-polypectomy and post-colorectal cancer resection surveillance guidelines.英国胃肠病学会/英国大肠直肠外科学会/英国公共卫生署息肉切除术后和结直肠癌切除术后监测指南。
Gut. 2020 Feb;69(2):201-223. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319858. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
6
High-Intensity Versus Low-Intensity Surveillance for Patients With Colorectal Adenomas: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.高强度监测与低强度监测在结直肠腺瘤患者中的应用:成本效果分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Nov 5;171(9):612-622. doi: 10.7326/M18-3633. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
7
When and How to Stop Surveillance Colonoscopy in Older Adults: Five Rules of Thumb for Practitioners.何时及如何停止对老年人进行监测性结肠镜检查:给从业者的五条经验法则。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan;113(1):5-7. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.461. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
8
KRAS and BRAF somatic mutations in colonic polyps and the risk of metachronous neoplasia.结肠息肉中的KRAS和BRAF体细胞突变与异时性肿瘤形成的风险
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 27;12(9):e0184937. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184937. eCollection 2017.
9
Adenoma surveillance and colorectal cancer incidence: a retrospective, multicentre, cohort study.腺瘤监测与结直肠癌发病率:一项回顾性、多中心、队列研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jun;18(6):823-834. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30187-0. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
10
Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Personalized Surveillance After Colorectal Adenomatous Polypectomy.结直肠腺瘤性息肉切除术后个性化监测的有效性和成本效益评估
Epidemiol Rev. 2017 Jan 1;39(1):148-160. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxx002.

本文引用的文献

1
European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition--Colonoscopic surveillance following adenoma removal.欧洲结直肠癌筛查和诊断质量保证指南。第一版——腺瘤切除后的结肠镜监测。
Endoscopy. 2012 Sep;44 Suppl 3:SE151-63. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1309821. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
2
Role of colonoscopy and polyp characteristics in colorectal cancer after colonoscopic polyp detection: a population-based case-control study.结肠镜检查和息肉特征在结肠镜检查发现息肉后的结直肠癌中的作用:基于人群的病例对照研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Aug 21;157(4):225-32. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-4-201208210-00002.
3
Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.筛查和息肉切除术后结肠镜监测指南:美国结直肠癌多学会特别工作组的共识更新
Gastroenterology. 2012 Sep;143(3):844-857. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.06.001. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
4
Primary care physician compliance with colorectal cancer screening guidelines.初级保健医生对结直肠癌筛查指南的依从性。
Cancer Causes Control. 2011 Sep;22(9):1277-87. doi: 10.1007/s10552-011-9801-0. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
5
Recommendations for post-polypectomy surveillance in community practice.社区实践中息肉切除术后监测的推荐建议。
Dig Dis Sci. 2011 Sep;56(9):2623-30. doi: 10.1007/s10620-011-1791-y. Epub 2011 Jun 23.
6
The American College of Gastroenterology Emily Couric Lecture--the adenoma-carcinoma sequence revisited: has the era of genetic tailoring finally arrived?美国胃肠病学院艾米丽·考利克讲座——重温腺瘤-癌序列:基因定制的时代终于到来了吗?
Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 Feb;106(2):190-8. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.423. Epub 2011 Jan 25.
7
Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers.将净重新分类改进计算扩展到测量新生物标志物的有用性。
Stat Med. 2011 Jan 15;30(1):11-21. doi: 10.1002/sim.4085. Epub 2010 Nov 5.
8
Are physicians' recommendations for colorectal cancer screening guideline-consistent?医生对结直肠癌筛查指南的推荐意见是否一致?
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Feb;26(2):177-84. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1516-5. Epub 2010 Oct 14.
9
Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy.筛查结肠镜检查中近端结肠锯齿状息肉的流行情况和可变检测。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Jan;9(1):42-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.09.013. Epub 2010 Oct 1.
10
Colorectal cancer prevention with colonoscopy: recent research and debate.结肠镜检查预防结直肠癌:近期研究与争论
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2010 Jul;6(7):428-30.