• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

器官供应后:评估肝移植中跨区域分配系统旅行的获益。

Following the organ supply: assessing the benefit of inter-DSA travel in liver transplantation.

机构信息

Center for Outcomes Research, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

Transplantation. 2013 Jan 27;95(2):361-71. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182737cfb.

DOI:10.1097/TP.0b013e3182737cfb
PMID:23250334
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Disparity in access to liver transplantation (LT) in the United States persists despite directives from the federal government to reduce geographic variation. We assessed the impact of socioeconomic status (SES) and traveling to alternative donation service areas (DSAs) on patient survival.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study integrating transplant registry and U.S. Census data was analyzed using multivariate linear Cox proportional hazards models. A separate matched-pairs analysis was used to assess the benefit of traveling on patient survival and transplantation rate.

RESULTS

High SES is associated with increased access to LT (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.05; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.01-1.08) and reduced mortality after waitlisting (aHR [95% CI], 0.88 [0.85-0.93]). Increased access is mediated, in part, through inter-DSA travel. Travel was associated with high SES, white race, blood group O, private insurance, and residence in regions 1, 5, and 11. Transplant candidates in the highest SES quartile were approximately 70% more likely to travel (aHR [95% CI], 1.67 [1.43-1.97]) than those in the lowest SES quartile. Compared with matched control patients, travelers were 74% more likely to be transplanted (aHR [95% CI], 1.74 [1.56-1.94]) and 20% less likely to die after listing (aHR [95% CI], 0.79 [0.69-0.92]).

CONCLUSION

High SES and inter-DSA travel are strongly associated with increased LT access and reduced mortality. Travelers are more likely to be sociodemographically advantaged and privately insured and to live in regions with reduced access to deceased-donor organs.

摘要

背景

尽管联邦政府发布指令要求减少地域差异,但美国在肝移植(LT)方面的可及性仍存在差异。我们评估了社会经济地位(SES)和前往替代供体服务区(DSA)对患者生存的影响。

方法

通过多变量线性 Cox 比例风险模型分析了整合移植登记处和美国人口普查数据的前瞻性队列研究。使用配对分析来评估旅行对患者生存和移植率的获益。

结果

高 SES 与 LT 可及性增加相关(校正后的危险比[aHR],1.05;95%置信区间[95%CI],1.01-1.08),并降低了等待名单后的死亡率(aHR[95%CI],0.88 [0.85-0.93])。这种增加在一定程度上是通过跨 DSA 旅行来实现的。旅行与高 SES、白种人、血型 O、私人保险以及居住在第 1、5 和 11 区有关。SES 最高四分位数的移植候选人旅行的可能性大约高 70%(aHR [95%CI],1.67 [1.43-1.97]),而 SES 最低四分位数的患者旅行的可能性低 70%。与匹配的对照患者相比,旅行者的移植率高 74%(aHR [95%CI],1.74 [1.56-1.94]),而名单后的死亡率低 20%(aHR [95%CI],0.79 [0.69-0.92])。

结论

高 SES 和跨 DSA 旅行与 LT 可及性增加和死亡率降低密切相关。旅行者更有可能在社会人口统计学上处于优势地位,有私人保险,并居住在获得死者供体器官机会减少的地区。

相似文献

1
Following the organ supply: assessing the benefit of inter-DSA travel in liver transplantation.器官供应后:评估肝移植中跨区域分配系统旅行的获益。
Transplantation. 2013 Jan 27;95(2):361-71. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182737cfb.
2
Racial and ethnic disparities in access to liver transplantation.种族和民族在获得肝移植方面的差异。
Liver Transpl. 2010 Sep;16(9):1033-40. doi: 10.1002/lt.22108.
3
The interplay of socioeconomic status, distance to center, and interdonor service area travel on kidney transplant access and outcomes.社会经济地位、距离中心的远近以及供体服务区之间的相互作用对肾移植的机会和结果的影响。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Dec;5(12):2276-88. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04940610. Epub 2010 Aug 26.
4
Racial Disparity in Liver Transplantation Listing.肝移植登记中的种族差异。
J Am Coll Surg. 2021 Apr;232(4):526-534. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.12.021. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
5
Differences in access to kidney transplantation between Hispanic and non-Hispanic whites by geographic location in the United States.美国不同地理位置的西班牙裔和非西班牙裔白人在接受肾移植方面的差异。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 Dec;8(12):2149-57. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01560213. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
6
Waiting time predicts survival after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a cohort study using the United Network for Organ Sharing registry.等待时间可预测肝细胞癌肝移植后的生存率:一项使用器官共享联合网络登记处的队列研究。
Liver Transpl. 2014 Sep;20(9):1045-56. doi: 10.1002/lt.23917. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
7
Association of race and insurance type with delayed assessment for kidney transplantation among patients initiating dialysis in the United States.在美国开始透析的患者中,种族和保险类型与延迟评估肾脏移植之间的关联。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012 Sep;7(9):1490-7. doi: 10.2215/CJN.13151211. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
8
Disparities in liver transplantation before and after introduction of the MELD score.终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分引入前后肝移植的差异。
JAMA. 2008 Nov 26;300(20):2371-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.720.
9
Black Patients Have Unequal Access to Listing for Liver Transplantation in the United States.美国的黑人患者在接受肝移植名单方面存在不平等的机会。
Hepatology. 2021 Sep;74(3):1523-1532. doi: 10.1002/hep.31837.
10
Patients From Appalachia Have Reduced Access to Liver Transplantation After Wait-Listing.阿巴拉契亚地区的患者在加入等待名单后获得肝移植的机会减少。
Prog Transplant. 2018 Dec;28(4):305-313. doi: 10.1177/1526924818800037. Epub 2018 Sep 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of a Liver Allocation Policy Change With Domestic Travel for Liver Transplantation.肝脏分配政策变化与肝移植国内旅行的关联
Transplant Direct. 2025 Jan 23;11(2):e1749. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001749. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Geographic disparities in access to liver transplantation.肝脏移植可及性的地域差异。
Liver Transpl. 2023 Sep 1;29(9):987-997. doi: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000182. Epub 2023 May 29.
3
Gerrymandering for Justice: Redistricting U.S. Liver Allocation.为公平而操纵选区划分:美国肝脏分配的重新划分选区
Interfaces (Providence). 2015 Sep-Oct;45(5):462-480. doi: 10.1287/inte.2015.0810. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
4
Lung transplant waitlist outcomes in the United States and patient travel distance.美国肺移植候补名单结果和患者旅行距离。
Am J Transplant. 2021 Jan;21(1):272-280. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16193. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
5
Quantifying Sex-Based Disparities in Liver Allocation.量化肝移植分配中的性别差异。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Jul 1;155(7):e201129. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1129. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
6
Social determinants in liver transplantation.肝移植中的社会决定因素。
Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2016 Jan 29;7(1):15-17. doi: 10.1002/cld.525. eCollection 2016 Jan.
7
Geographic disparities in liver supply/demand ratio within fixed-distance and fixed-population circles.固定距离和固定人口圈内肝源供需比的地域差异。
Am J Transplant. 2019 Jul;19(7):2044-2052. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15297. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
8
The landscape of international living kidney donation in the United States.美国国际活体肾脏捐献的现状。
Am J Transplant. 2019 Jul;19(7):2009-2019. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15256. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
9
Waitlist Outcomes in Liver Transplant Candidates with High MELD and Severe Hepatic Encephalopathy.高 MELD 评分和严重肝性脑病的肝移植候选者的候补名单结局。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Jun;63(6):1647-1653. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5032-5. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
10
Predicting Outcomes on the Liver Transplant Waiting List in the United States: Accounting for Large Regional Variation in Organ Availability and Priority Allocation Points.预测美国肝脏移植等待名单上的结果:考虑器官可获得性和优先分配点数的巨大区域差异
Transplantation. 2016 Oct;100(10):2153-9. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001384.