• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会经济地位、距离中心的远近以及供体服务区之间的相互作用对肾移植的机会和结果的影响。

The interplay of socioeconomic status, distance to center, and interdonor service area travel on kidney transplant access and outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.

出版信息

Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Dec;5(12):2276-88. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04940610. Epub 2010 Aug 26.

DOI:10.2215/CJN.04940610
PMID:20798250
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2994090/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Variation in kidney transplant access across the United States may motivate relocation of patients with ability to travel to better-supplied areas.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We examined national transplant registry and U.S. Census data for kidney transplant candidates listed in 1999 to 2009 with a reported residential zip code (n = 203,267). Cox's regression was used to assess associations of socioeconomic status (SES), distance from residence to transplant center, and relocation to a different donation service area (DSA) with transplant access and outcomes.

RESULTS

Patients in the highest SES quartile had increased access to transplant compared with those with lowest SES, driven strongly by 76% higher likelihood of living donor transplantation (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.70 to 1.83). Waitlist death was reduced in high compared with low SES candidates (aHR 0.86, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.89). High SES patients also experienced lower mortality after living and deceased donor transplant. Patients living farther from the transplant center had reduced access to deceased donor transplant and increased risk of post-transplant death. Inter-DSA travel was associated with a dramatic increase in deceased donor transplant access (HR 1.94, 95% CI 1.88 to 2.00) and was predicted by high SES, white race, and longer deceased-donor allograft waiting time in initial DSA.

CONCLUSIONS

Ongoing disparities exist in kidney transplantation access and outcomes on the basis of geography and SES despite near-universal insurance coverage under Medicare. Inter-DSA travel improves access and is more common among high SES candidates.

摘要

背景与目的

美国各地肾移植机会的差异可能促使有能力旅行的患者迁往供应更好的地区。

设计、设置、参与者和测量方法:我们研究了国家移植登记处和美国人口普查数据,这些数据来自 1999 年至 2009 年报告居住地邮政编码的肾移植候选人(n=203267)。使用 Cox 回归评估社会经济地位(SES)、居住地到移植中心的距离以及迁往不同的供体服务区(DSA)与移植机会和结果的关系。

结果

与 SES 最低的患者相比,SES 最高的患者具有更高的移植机会,这主要是由于活体供体移植的可能性增加了 76%(调整后的危险比[HR]1.76,95%置信区间[CI]1.70 至 1.83)。高 SES 候选者的候补名单死亡率低于低 SES 候选者(HR 0.86,95%CI 0.84 至 0.89)。高 SES 患者在接受活体和已故供体移植后也经历了较低的死亡率。离移植中心较远的患者接受已故供体移植的机会减少,移植后死亡的风险增加。跨 DSA 旅行与已故供体移植机会的显著增加相关(HR 1.94,95%CI 1.88 至 2.00),并受 SES 较高、白种人以及初始 DSA 中已故供体移植物等待时间较长的预测。

结论

尽管医疗保险提供了近乎普遍的保险覆盖,但基于地理位置和 SES,肾移植机会和结果仍然存在持续的差异。跨 DSA 旅行可提高移植机会,并且在 SES 较高的候选者中更为常见。

相似文献

1
The interplay of socioeconomic status, distance to center, and interdonor service area travel on kidney transplant access and outcomes.社会经济地位、距离中心的远近以及供体服务区之间的相互作用对肾移植的机会和结果的影响。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Dec;5(12):2276-88. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04940610. Epub 2010 Aug 26.
2
Following the organ supply: assessing the benefit of inter-DSA travel in liver transplantation.器官供应后:评估肝移植中跨区域分配系统旅行的获益。
Transplantation. 2013 Jan 27;95(2):361-71. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182737cfb.
3
Association between Longer Travel Distance for Transplant Care and Access to Kidney Transplantation and Graft Survival in the United States.美国范围内,移植护理的旅行距离与肾移植机会和移植物存活率的关联。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021 May 3;32(5):1151-1161. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2020081242. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
4
The impact of socioeconomic status and geographic remoteness on access to pre-emptive kidney transplantation and transplant outcomes among children.社会经济地位和地理位置偏远对儿童获得抢先肾移植及移植结局的影响。
Pediatr Nephrol. 2016 Jun;31(6):1011-9. doi: 10.1007/s00467-015-3279-z. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
5
Distance to Kidney Transplant Center and Access to Early Steps in the Kidney Transplantation Process in the Southeastern United States.美国东南部离肾移植中心的距离与肾移植过程早期步骤的可及性。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020 Apr 7;15(4):539-549. doi: 10.2215/CJN.08530719. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
6
Neighborhood Segregation and Access to Live Donor Kidney Transplantation.社区分割与活体供肾移植机会
JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Apr 1;184(4):402-413. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.8184.
7
Lower socioeconomic status is associated with worse outcomes after both listing and transplanting children with heart failure.社会经济地位较低与心力衰竭患儿登记入册及接受移植后的不良预后相关。
Pediatr Transplant. 2013 Sep;17(6):573-81. doi: 10.1111/petr.12117. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
8
Listing at non-local transplant centers is associated with increased access to deceased donor kidney transplantation.在非本地移植中心进行登记与增加获得已故供体肾移植的机会有关。
Am J Transplant. 2022 Jul;22(7):1813-1822. doi: 10.1111/ajt.17044. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
9
Association Between Declined Offers of Deceased Donor Kidney Allograft and Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Candidates.接受或拒绝已故供体肾移植与肾移植候选人结局的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e1910312. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10312.
10
Racial disparities in pediatric access to kidney transplantation: does socioeconomic status play a role?儿童接受肾移植的种族差异:社会经济地位是否起作用?
Am J Transplant. 2012 Feb;12(2):369-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03888.x. Epub 2012 Jan 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidence and determinants of graft failure and death with functioning graft after re-transplantation.再次移植后移植失败及移植功能良好情况下死亡的发生率与决定因素。
Pediatr Nephrol. 2025 Aug 7. doi: 10.1007/s00467-025-06898-9.
2
Life on the Line: Prioritizing Equity in Kidney Transplantation for Populations Marginalized by Race and Ethnicity.生死攸关:为因种族和族裔而被边缘化的人群在肾脏移植中优先实现公平。
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2025 Apr 10;12:20543581251331076. doi: 10.1177/20543581251331076. eCollection 2025.
3
Evaluating Challenges in Access To Transplantation for Persons with HIV.评估艾滋病毒感染者获得移植面临的挑战。
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2025 Mar 21;22(1):26. doi: 10.1007/s11904-025-00735-2.
4
Socioeconomic Differences in Navigating Access to Lung Transplant.肺移植获取途径中的社会经济差异
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e250572. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0572.
5
Reintegration Into the Workforce After Kidney Transplantation Based on Urbanization Status in Switzerland.基于瑞士城市化状况的肾移植后重返劳动力市场情况
Kidney Int Rep. 2024 Nov 6;10(2):565-573. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2024.10.029. eCollection 2025 Feb.
6
Hybrid Telemedicine and In-Person Care for Kidney Transplant Follow-Up: A Qualitative Study.用于肾移植随访的混合远程医疗与面对面护理:一项定性研究。
Clin Transplant. 2025 Feb;39(2):e70106. doi: 10.1111/ctr.70106.
7
Impact of public versus non public insurance on hispanic kidney transplant outcomes using UNOS database.利用器官共享联合网络(UNOS)数据库研究公共保险与非公共保险对西班牙裔肾移植结果的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 10;15(1):4879. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88672-3.
8
Association of a Liver Allocation Policy Change With Domestic Travel for Liver Transplantation.肝脏分配政策变化与肝移植国内旅行的关联
Transplant Direct. 2025 Jan 23;11(2):e1749. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001749. eCollection 2025 Feb.
9
Factors associated with statural growth in pediatric kidney transplant recipients with focus on metabolic acidosis.以代谢性酸中毒为重点的小儿肾移植受者身高增长相关因素。
Pediatr Nephrol. 2025 Jun;40(6):2059-2070. doi: 10.1007/s00467-025-06663-y. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
10
Using Animation to Address Disparities in Kidney Transplantation.利用动画解决肾移植中的差异问题。
Health Commun. 2024 Oct 29:1-8. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2024.2421616.

本文引用的文献

1
Kidney and pancreas transplantation in the United States, 1999-2008: the changing face of living donation.美国 1999-2008 年的肾和胰腺移植:活体捐献者的变化。
Am J Transplant. 2010 Apr;10(4 Pt 2):987-1002. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03022.x.
2
Sociodemographic differences in early access to liver transplantation services.早期获得肝移植服务方面的社会人口统计学差异。
Am J Transplant. 2009 Sep;9(9):2092-101. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02737.x. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
3
Disparities in the utilization of live donor renal transplantation.活体供肾移植利用方面的差异。
Am J Transplant. 2009 May;9(5):1124-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02620.x.
4
Neighborhood poverty and racial disparities in kidney transplant waitlisting.肾脏移植等待名单中的邻里贫困与种族差异。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 Jun;20(6):1333-40. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2008030335. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
5
Access to liver transplantation in the MELD era: role of ethnicity and insurance.终末期肝病模型(MELD)时代肝移植的可及性:种族与保险的作用
Dig Dis Sci. 2009 Aug;54(8):1794-7. doi: 10.1007/s10620-008-0567-5. Epub 2008 Dec 3.
6
Regional and racial disparities in the use of live non-directed kidney donors.活体非指定肾脏供体使用方面的地区和种族差异。
Am J Transplant. 2008 May;8(5):1051-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02192.x.
7
A systematic review of patient and health system characteristics associated with late referral in chronic kidney disease.一项关于与慢性肾脏病延迟转诊相关的患者和卫生系统特征的系统评价。
BMC Nephrol. 2008 Feb 25;9:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-9-3.
8
Impact of geographic location on access to liver transplantation among ethnic minorities.地理位置对少数民族肝移植可及性的影响。
Transplantation. 2008 Jan 27;85(2):166-70. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31816223f8.
9
Insurance type and minority status associated with large disparities in prelisting dialysis among candidates for kidney transplantation.保险类型和少数族裔身份与肾移植候选人预列透析方面的巨大差异相关。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008 Mar;3(2):463-70. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02220507. Epub 2008 Jan 16.
10
Role of socioeconomic status in kidney transplant outcome.社会经济地位在肾移植结果中的作用。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Mar;1(2):313-22. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00630805. Epub 2006 Jan 11.