• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[该神奇仪器在测量哥伦比亚成年人生活方式方面的有效性和可靠性]

[The Fantastic instrument's validity and reliability for measuring Colombian adults' life-style].

作者信息

Ramírez-Vélez Robinson, Agredo Ricardo A

机构信息

Programa de Fisioterapia, Universidad Manuela Beltrán, Bogotá, Colombia.

出版信息

Rev Salud Publica (Bogota). 2012 Mar-Apr;14(2):226-37. doi: 10.1590/s0124-00642012000200004.

DOI:10.1590/s0124-00642012000200004
PMID:23250366
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Fantastic lifestyle assessment questionnaire was designed to help healthcare physicians measure their patients' life-styles. This work was thus aimed at assessing the reliability and validity of the Fantastic questionnaire (version 3 translated into Spanish) on a group of Colombian adults.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The questionnaire was administered to 550 people to fill out themselves. Measures of central tendency and dispersion were used for the domains and groups; internal consistency and inter-scalar correlation were calculated.

RESULTS

It was found that the 25 items, and those grouped into 10 domains exceeded the proposed reliability standard (Cronbach α), being greater than 0.50 and 0.73, respectively. Inter-scalar correlation was good and acceptable in various categories of the Fantastic questionnaire (total cf domains), (r=0.19 to 0.79; p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Fantastic questionnaire version 3 brings together some of the internal consistency and construct validity criteria. It is recommended that the questionnaire be used in primary healthcare and epidemiological studies.

摘要

目的

“梦幻生活方式评估问卷”旨在帮助医疗保健医生评估患者的生活方式。因此,这项工作旨在评估“梦幻问卷”(翻译成西班牙语的第3版)在一组哥伦比亚成年人中的信度和效度。

材料与方法

向550人发放问卷让他们自行填写。对各个领域和组别采用集中趋势和离散度测量方法;计算内部一致性和标度间相关性。

结果

发现25个项目以及分为10个领域的项目均超过了提议的信度标准(克朗巴哈α系数),分别大于0.50和0.73。在“梦幻问卷”的各类别(总分与各领域得分)中,标度间相关性良好且可接受(r = 0.19至0.79;p < 0.01)。

结论

“梦幻问卷”第3版符合一些内部一致性和结构效度标准。建议在初级医疗保健和流行病学研究中使用该问卷。

相似文献

1
[The Fantastic instrument's validity and reliability for measuring Colombian adults' life-style].[该神奇仪器在测量哥伦比亚成年人生活方式方面的有效性和可靠性]
Rev Salud Publica (Bogota). 2012 Mar-Apr;14(2):226-37. doi: 10.1590/s0124-00642012000200004.
2
Brazilian version of a lifestyle questionnaire: translation and validation for young adults.巴西版生活方式问卷:针对年轻人的翻译与验证
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2008 Aug;91(2):92-8. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2008001400006.
3
The Validity and Reliability of the FANTASTIC Questionnaire for Nutritional and Lifestyle Studies in University Students.大学生营养与生活方式研究用 FANTASTIC 问卷的有效性和可靠性。
Nutrients. 2022 Aug 14;14(16):3328. doi: 10.3390/nu14163328.
4
Validation in Colombia of the Oswestry disability questionnaire in patients with low back pain.哥伦比亚低腰痛患者 Oswestry 残疾问卷的验证。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Dec 15;36(26):E1730-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318219d184.
5
[Translation, adaptation and validation of the Fantastic Lifestyle Assessment questionnaire with students in higher education].[《梦幻生活方式评估问卷》在高等教育学生中的翻译、改编与验证]
Cien Saude Colet. 2014 Jun;19(6):1901-9. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232014196.04822013.
6
[The reliability of preliminary normative values from the short form health survey (SF-12) questionnaire regarding Colombian adults].[关于哥伦比亚成年人的简短健康调查问卷(SF - 12)初步标准值的可靠性]
Rev Salud Publica (Bogota). 2010 Oct;12(5):807-19.
7
Reliability and validity of the Persian version of the spinal cord injury lifestyle scale and the health behavior questionnaire in persons with spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤生活方式量表波斯语版及脊髓损伤患者健康行为问卷的信效度研究
Spinal Cord. 2018 May;56(5):509-515. doi: 10.1038/s41393-017-0056-9. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
8
Validity and reliability of the Italian version of the ECOS-16 questionnaire in postmenopausal women with prevalent vertebral fractures due to osteoporosis.ECOS-16问卷意大利语版本在患有骨质疏松症所致椎体骨折的绝经后女性中的效度和信度
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007 May-Jun;25(3):390-403.
9
Reliability and validity of the adapted Dutch version of the revised Scoliosis Research Society 22-item questionnaire.修订版脊柱侧弯研究学会22项问卷荷兰语改编版的信度和效度
Spine J. 2014 Aug 1;14(8):1663-72. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.09.046. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
10
Youth Leisure-Time Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire (YLSBQ): Reliability and Validity in Colombian University Students.青年闲暇久坐行为问卷(YLSBQ):哥伦比亚大学生的信度和效度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 26;18(15):7895. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157895.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of Sociodemographic Variables on the Lifestyle of the Adult Population: A Multicenter Observational Study.社会人口统计学变量对成年人群生活方式的影响:一项多中心观察性研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 30;13(13):1564. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13131564.
2
Construct Validity and Reliability of the 'Lifestyle (PAHO) in the Adult Population' Questionnaire.《成人人群中“生活方式(泛美卫生组织)”问卷》的结构效度和信度
Glob Adv Integr Med Health. 2025 May 5;14:27536130251340403. doi: 10.1177/27536130251340403. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Sense of coherence is associated with the presence of healthy lifestyles in the migrant population.
连贯感与移民人口中健康生活方式的存在有关。
Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 12;16:1543830. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1543830. eCollection 2025.
4
Association between Quality of Life, Confinement, and Sex in Adults: A Multigroup Structural Equation Analysis.成人生活质量、分娩限制与性生活之间的关联:多组结构方程分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Apr 3;12(7):774. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12070774.
5
FANTASTIC lifestyle questionnaire from 1983 until 2022: A review.1983年至2022年的精彩生活方式问卷:综述
Health Promot Perspect. 2023 Jul 10;13(2):88-98. doi: 10.34172/hpp.2023.11. eCollection 2023.
6
Design and Content Validation using Expert Opinions of an Instrument Assessing the Lifestyle of Adults: The 'PONTE A 100' Questionnaire.使用专家意见对评估成年人生活方式的工具进行设计和内容验证:“PONTE A 100”问卷
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 16;11(14):2038. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11142038.
7
A Practice-Proven Adaptive Case Management Approach for Innovative Health Care Services (Health Circuit): Cluster Randomized Clinical Pilot and Descriptive Observational Study.一种经过实践验证的适应性病例管理方法,用于创新医疗服务(Health Circuit):集群随机临床试点和描述性观察研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 14;25:e47672. doi: 10.2196/47672.
8
The Validity and Reliability of the FANTASTIC Questionnaire for Nutritional and Lifestyle Studies in University Students.大学生营养与生活方式研究用 FANTASTIC 问卷的有效性和可靠性。
Nutrients. 2022 Aug 14;14(16):3328. doi: 10.3390/nu14163328.
9
Healthy Lifestyles Associated With Socioeconomic Determinants in the Older Adult Population.健康生活方式与老年人群体的社会经济决定因素相关。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2022 Jan-Dec;13:21501319221112808. doi: 10.1177/21501319221112808.
10
The Impact of COVID-19 on the Lifestyles of University Students: A Spanish Online Survey.新冠疫情对大学生生活方式的影响:一项西班牙在线调查。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Feb 5;10(2):309. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10020309.