National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51942. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051942. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) have become a ubiquitous experimental tool for down-regulating mRNAs. Unfortunately, off-target effects are a significant source of false positives in siRNA experiments and an effective control for them has not previously been identified. We introduce two methods of mismatched siRNA design for negative controls based on changing bases in the middle of the siRNA to their complement bases. To test these controls, a test set of 20 highly active siRNAs (10 true positives and 10 false positives) was identified from a genome-wide screen performed in a cell-line expressing a simple, constitutively expressed luciferase reporter. Three controls were then synthesized for each of these 20 siRNAs, the first two using the proposed mismatch design methods and the third being a simple random permutation of the sequence (scrambled siRNA). When tested in the original assay, the scrambled siRNAs showed significantly reduced activity in comparison to the original siRNAs, regardless of whether they had been identified as true or false positives, indicating that they have little utility as experimental controls. In contrast, one of the proposed mismatch design methods, dubbed C911 because bases 9 through 11 of the siRNA are replaced with their complement, was able to completely distinguish between the two groups. False positives due to off-target effects maintained most of their activity when the C911 mismatch control was tested, whereas true positives whose phenotype was due to on-target effects lost most or all of their activity when the C911 mismatch was tested. The ability of control siRNAs to distinguish between true and false positives, if widely adopted, could reduce erroneous results being reported in the literature and save research dollars spent on expensive follow-up experiments.
小干扰 RNA(siRNA)已成为下调 mRNA 的通用实验工具。不幸的是,脱靶效应是 siRNA 实验中产生假阳性的一个重要来源,而以前尚未确定有效的对照方法。我们介绍了两种基于 siRNA 中间碱基替换为互补碱基的错配 siRNA 设计方法,用于设计阴性对照。为了测试这些对照,我们从一个在表达简单、组成型表达荧光素酶报告基因的细胞系中进行的全基因组筛选中鉴定了一组 20 个高活性 siRNA(10 个真阳性和 10 个假阳性)。然后,为这 20 个 siRNA 中的每一个合成了三个对照,前两个使用所提出的错配设计方法,第三个是序列的简单随机排列(随机 siRNA)。在原始测定中测试时,与原始 siRNA 相比,随机 siRNA 显示出显著降低的活性,无论它们是否被鉴定为真阳性或假阳性,这表明它们作为实验对照的用途不大。相比之下,所提出的错配设计方法之一,因其 siRNA 的第 9 至 11 位碱基被替换为互补碱基而被命名为 C911,能够完全区分这两组。当测试 C911 错配对照时,由于脱靶效应引起的假阳性仍然保持大部分活性,而由于靶标效应引起的真阳性则在测试 C911 错配时失去大部分或全部活性。如果广泛采用对照 siRNA 来区分真阳性和假阳性,那么可以减少文献中错误结果的报道,并节省用于昂贵后续实验的研究资金。