Department of Anthropology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, USA.
Med Anthropol Q. 2012 Sep;26(3):361-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1387.2012.01223.x.
Even in a country with super-low fertility rates, at least one-quarter of all babies are unplanned. The finding puzzles policymakers. This article uses Italy's "curious case" as a jumping-off point to expose assumptions about rationality. It offers a model to dismantle the "conceit" of rationality, drawing on Max Weber's classic critique and Emily Martin's contemporary appraisal. It asks: (1) How do assumptions about rationality related to sexuality and reproduction manifest? (2) How do qualitative data challenge rationalist assumptions? and (3) How are cultural logics expressed and what do they reveal about the "problem" of low fertility? Methodologically, the article offers an innovative approach, juxtaposing ethnographic data derived from the author's fieldwork with startling findings from Italian researchers' multicity project. The analysis exposes the rationality trope as a technique of governance in a context in which policymakers yearn for social cohesion and population politics intensify around birthing, immigration, and aging.
即使在生育率超低的国家,至少四分之一的婴儿是意外怀孕的。这一发现令政策制定者感到困惑。本文以意大利的“奇特案例”为切入点,揭示了关于理性的假设。它提供了一个模型,利用马克斯·韦伯的经典批判和艾米丽·马丁的当代评估来拆解理性的“自负”。它提出了以下三个问题:(1)关于性和生殖的理性假设是如何表现的?(2)定性数据如何挑战理性主义假设?(3)文化逻辑是如何表达的,它们对低生育率的“问题”揭示了什么?从方法论上讲,本文提供了一种创新的方法,将作者实地调查获得的民族志数据与意大利研究人员多城市项目的惊人发现并置。分析揭示了理性比喻是一种治理技术,在这种情况下,政策制定者渴望社会凝聚力,人口政策围绕生育、移民和老龄化问题而加剧。