Àrea de Suport a la Recerca en Cures, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain.
Evidence-Based Health Care South America: A JBI Affiliated Group, Lima, Peru.
Womens Health (Lond). 2022 Jan-Dec;18:17455057221090827. doi: 10.1177/17455057221090827.
Black women living with HIV account for a higher proportion of new HIV diagnoses than other groups. These women experience restricted access to reproductive services and inadequate support from healthcare providers because their position in society is based on their sexual health and social identity in the context of this stigmatizing chronic disease. By recognizing the analytical relevance of intersectionality, the reproductive decision-making of Black women can be explored as a social phenomenon of society with varied positionality.
The purpose of this review was to synthesize the evidence about the reproductive decision-making of Black women living with HIV in high-income countries from the beginning of the HIV epidemic to the present.
This systematic review was guided by the JBI evidence synthesis recommendations. Searches were completed in seven databases from 1985 to 2021, and the review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420180919).
Of 3503 records, 22 studies were chosen for synthesis, including 19 observational and three qualitative designs. Nearly, all studies originated from the United States; the earliest was reported in 1995. Few studies provided detailed sociodemographic data or subgroup analysis focused on race or ethnicity. Influencing factors for reproductive decision-making were organized into the following seven categories: ethnicity, race, and pregnancy; religion and spirituality; attitudes and beliefs about antiretroviral therapy; supportive people; motherhood and fulfillment; reproductive planning; and health and wellness.
No major differences were identified in the reproductive decision-making of Black women living with HIV. Even though Black women were the largest group of women living with HIV, no studies reported a subgroup analysis, and few studies detailed sociodemographic information specific to Black women. In the future, institutional review boards should require a subgroup analysis for Black women when they are included as participants in larger studies of women living with HIV.
感染艾滋病毒的黑人女性在新诊断出的艾滋病毒感染者中所占比例高于其他群体。这些女性获得生殖服务的机会受到限制,并且得不到医疗服务提供者的充分支持,因为在这种污名化的慢性疾病背景下,她们的社会地位取决于她们的性健康和社会身份。通过认识到交叉性的分析相关性,可以将感染艾滋病毒的黑人女性的生殖决策视为具有不同地位的社会的一种社会现象。
本综述旨在综合高收入国家自艾滋病流行开始至今有关感染艾滋病毒的黑人女性生殖决策的证据。
本系统综述遵循 JBI 证据综合建议进行。从 1985 年到 2021 年,在七个数据库中进行了搜索,并在 PROSPERO(CRD420180919)中注册了综述方案。
在 3503 条记录中,有 22 项研究被纳入综合分析,其中包括 19 项观察性研究和 3 项定性设计研究。几乎所有的研究都源自美国;最早的研究报告于 1995 年。很少有研究提供详细的社会人口统计学数据或专注于种族或族裔的亚组分析。生殖决策的影响因素分为以下七个类别:种族、宗教和精神信仰、对抗逆转录病毒治疗的态度和信念、支持的人、母性和满足感、生殖计划以及健康和健康。
感染艾滋病毒的黑人女性在生殖决策方面没有明显差异。尽管黑人女性是感染艾滋病毒的女性中最大的群体,但没有研究报告亚组分析,也很少有研究详细说明黑人女性的社会人口统计学信息。在未来,当黑人女性被纳入更大规模的感染艾滋病毒的女性研究时,机构审查委员会应要求对黑人女性进行亚组分析。