Suppr超能文献

测量青少年在安全机构和矫正青少年关怀中对有问题的社会情境的不恰当反应:TOPS-A 的验证研究。

Measuring inappropriate responses of adolescents to problematic social situations in secure institutional and correctional youth care: a validation study of the TOPS-A.

机构信息

Professional University of Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Interpers Violence. 2013 May;28(8):1579-95. doi: 10.1177/0886260512468322. Epub 2012 Dec 24.

Abstract

The present study examined the construct, concurrent and divergent validity, and reliability of the "Taxonomy of Problematic Social Situations-Adolescent self-report version" (TOPS-A) in a sample of 128 adolescents placed in Dutch secure juvenile facilities. The instrument measures inappropriate responses of adolescents to problematic social situations at the living group. Confirmatory factor analysis of a four-factor model (inappropriate responses to situations of disadvantage, competition, accepting/giving help, and accepting authority) with a second-order factor (inappropriate responses to problematic social situations) showed an exact fit to the data, indicating construct validity of the TOPS-A. Evidence for concurrent validity was found in associations with aggression and living group climate. Divergent validity could not be reliably assessed. Cronbach's α reliability coefficients were satisfactory. The TOPS-A is a parsimonious instrument that can be used to assess and target inappropriate responses to problematic social situations in (delinquent) adolescents in secure institutional and correctional youth care.

摘要

本研究在一个由 128 名被安置在荷兰安全少年犯教养所的青少年组成的样本中,考察了“问题社会情境分类-青少年自我报告版”(TOPS-A)的结构、同时效度和区分效度及信度。该工具测量了青少年在生活群体中对问题社会情境的不适当反应。对具有二阶因子(对问题社会情境的不适当反应)的四因子模型(对劣势、竞争、接受/给予帮助和接受权威情境的不适当反应)的验证性因子分析结果与数据完全吻合,表明了 TOPS-A 的结构效度。与攻击性和生活群体氛围的关联为其提供了同时效度的证据。区分效度则无法可靠评估。克朗巴赫的α信度系数是令人满意的。TOPS-A 是一个简洁的工具,可以用来评估和针对(犯罪)青少年在安全机构和矫正青年关怀中对问题社会情境的不适当反应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验