Professional University of Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands.
J Interpers Violence. 2013 May;28(8):1579-95. doi: 10.1177/0886260512468322. Epub 2012 Dec 24.
The present study examined the construct, concurrent and divergent validity, and reliability of the "Taxonomy of Problematic Social Situations-Adolescent self-report version" (TOPS-A) in a sample of 128 adolescents placed in Dutch secure juvenile facilities. The instrument measures inappropriate responses of adolescents to problematic social situations at the living group. Confirmatory factor analysis of a four-factor model (inappropriate responses to situations of disadvantage, competition, accepting/giving help, and accepting authority) with a second-order factor (inappropriate responses to problematic social situations) showed an exact fit to the data, indicating construct validity of the TOPS-A. Evidence for concurrent validity was found in associations with aggression and living group climate. Divergent validity could not be reliably assessed. Cronbach's α reliability coefficients were satisfactory. The TOPS-A is a parsimonious instrument that can be used to assess and target inappropriate responses to problematic social situations in (delinquent) adolescents in secure institutional and correctional youth care.
本研究在一个由 128 名被安置在荷兰安全少年犯教养所的青少年组成的样本中,考察了“问题社会情境分类-青少年自我报告版”(TOPS-A)的结构、同时效度和区分效度及信度。该工具测量了青少年在生活群体中对问题社会情境的不适当反应。对具有二阶因子(对问题社会情境的不适当反应)的四因子模型(对劣势、竞争、接受/给予帮助和接受权威情境的不适当反应)的验证性因子分析结果与数据完全吻合,表明了 TOPS-A 的结构效度。与攻击性和生活群体氛围的关联为其提供了同时效度的证据。区分效度则无法可靠评估。克朗巴赫的α信度系数是令人满意的。TOPS-A 是一个简洁的工具,可以用来评估和针对(犯罪)青少年在安全机构和矫正青年关怀中对问题社会情境的不适当反应。