Tavecchio Louis, Van der Helm Peer, Moonen Xavier, Assink Mark, Stams Geert Jan, Wissink Inge, Asscher Jessica
University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
University of Applied Sciences, Leiden, The Netherlands.
New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2019 Sep;2019(167):117-131. doi: 10.1002/cad.20311. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
This study provides an illustration of a research design complementary to randomized controlled trial to evaluate program effects, namely, participatory peer research (PPR). The PPR described in current study was carried out in a small sample (N = 10) of young adults with mild intellectual disabilities (MID) and severe behavioral problems. During the PPR intervention, control and feedback to individuals is restored by training them to become participant-researchers, who collaborate in a small group of people with MID. Their research is aimed at the problems the young adults perceive and/or specific subjects of their interest. The study was designed as a multiple case study with an experimental and comparison group. Questionnaires and a semistructured interview were administered before and after the PPR project. Results of Reliable Change Index (RCI) analyses showed a decrease in self-serving cognitive distortions in the PPR group, but not in the comparison group. These results indicate that PPR helps to compensate for a lack of adequate feedback and control, and in turn may decrease distorted thinking and thereby possibly later challenging behavior.
本研究展示了一种与随机对照试验互补的研究设计,用于评估项目效果,即参与式同伴研究(PPR)。当前研究中描述的PPR是在一小群(N = 10)有轻度智力障碍(MID)和严重行为问题的年轻人中进行的。在PPR干预过程中,通过培训他们成为参与研究的人员来恢复对个体的控制和反馈,这些人员在一小群有MID的人群中进行合作。他们的研究针对的是年轻人所感知到的问题和/或他们感兴趣的特定主题。该研究被设计为一个有实验组和对照组的多案例研究。在PPR项目前后进行了问卷调查和半结构化访谈。可靠变化指数(RCI)分析结果显示,PPR组中自利性认知扭曲有所减少,而对照组则没有。这些结果表明,PPR有助于弥补缺乏充分反馈和控制的问题,进而可能减少扭曲思维,从而可能减少日后的挑战行为。