• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群体氛围量表(GCI)在轻度智力障碍或边缘智力人群中的心理测量学特性。

Psychometric properties of the Group Climate Instrument (GCI) in individuals with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning.

机构信息

Radboud University, Behavioural Science Institute, Nijmegen and Trajectum, Zwolle, The Netherlands.

University of Applied Science, Youth Expert Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Intellect Disabil Res. 2019 Mar;63(3):215-224. doi: 10.1111/jir.12567. Epub 2018 Nov 19.

DOI:10.1111/jir.12567
PMID:30456768
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7379960/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study examined the psychometric properties of the Group Climate Instrument (GCI) in a sample of N = 189 adults (79% men) with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning who were residents of a treatment facility in the Netherlands.

METHOD

Construct validity of the GCI was examined by means of confirmatory factor analysis. Also, reliability and convergent validity of the GCI were examined. We also examined the variability in perception of the living group climate between and within living groups by computing intraclass correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

The model contained four first-order factors (support, growth, group atmosphere and repression) and a second-order factor overall climate, providing preliminary support for construct validity of the GCI. Reliability coefficients were good for all factors. Preliminary evidence for convergent validity was found in significant moderate associations between subscales and single item ratings for the factors of group climate. The intraclass correlation coefficients indicated that a considerate proportion of variance can be attributed to between-group differences.

CONCLUSIONS

The GCI might be used to assess perception of the living group climate for individuals with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning in psychiatric and forensic care settings, although further development of the GCI and replication of our findings seem necessary.

摘要

背景

本研究在荷兰一家治疗机构的 189 名轻度智力障碍或边缘智力功能成年人(79%为男性)样本中,检验了群体氛围量表(GCI)的心理计量学特性。

方法

采用验证性因子分析来检验 GCI 的结构效度。同时,还检验了 GCI 的信度和聚合效度。我们还通过计算组内相关系数来检验生活群体之间和内部对生活群体氛围的感知差异。

结果

该模型包含四个一阶因素(支持、成长、群体氛围和压抑)和一个二阶总体氛围因素,为 GCI 的结构效度提供了初步支持。所有因素的信度系数都很好。群体氛围因子的分量表和单项评分之间存在显著的中度关联,为聚合效度提供了初步证据。组内相关系数表明,相当一部分变异可以归因于组间差异。

结论

GCI 可以用于评估精神科和法医护理环境中轻度智力障碍或边缘智力功能个体对生活群体氛围的感知,尽管需要进一步开发 GCI 并复制我们的研究结果。

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Group Climate Instrument (GCI) in individuals with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning.群体氛围量表(GCI)在轻度智力障碍或边缘智力人群中的心理测量学特性。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2019 Mar;63(3):215-224. doi: 10.1111/jir.12567. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
2
Psychometric analysis of the Group Climate Inventory-Revised in adults with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning in a secure residential facility.在一家安全居住设施中,对轻度智力残疾或边缘智力功能的成年人修订版团体氛围量表进行心理测量分析。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2024 Jan;37(1):e13183. doi: 10.1111/jar.13183. Epub 2023 Dec 3.
3
Measurement invariance of the group climate inventory across adults with and without mild intellectual disability in secure residential facilities.安全居住设施中有无轻度智力障碍成年人的群体氛围量表的测量不变性
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2024 Jan;37(1):e13166. doi: 10.1111/jar.13166. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
4
Group Climate in Residential Youth Care: Development and Validation of the Group Climate Instrument-Revised.青少年寄宿照料中的团体氛围:团体氛围量表修订版的编制与验证
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2024 Jan 16:306624X231219984. doi: 10.1177/0306624X231219984.
5
Group climate, aggressive incidents and coercion in a secure forensic setting for individuals with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning: A multilevel study.群体氛围、攻击事件与轻度智力障碍或边缘智力个体在安全司法环境中的强制:一项多层次研究
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2021 Jul;34(4):1026-1036. doi: 10.1111/jar.12841. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
6
Relationships between dynamic risk factors for externalising problem behaviour and group climate in adults with mild intellectual disability in forensic treatment.法医治疗中轻度智力残疾成年人外化问题行为的动态风险因素与群体氛围之间的关系
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2023 May;36(3):641-652. doi: 10.1111/jar.13088. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
7
Psychometric properties of the Dynamic Risk Outcome Scales (DROS) for individuals with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning and externalizing behaviour problems.动态风险结果量表(DROS)在轻度智力障碍或边缘智力功能以及外化行为问题个体中的心理测量学特性。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2020 Jul;33(4):662-672. doi: 10.1111/jar.12546. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
8
Development and psychometric assessment of a psychological well-being instrument for adults with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning.发展和心理测量评估轻度智力障碍或边缘智力成年人的心理健康工具。
Res Dev Disabil. 2022 Feb;121:104151. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2021.104151. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
9
Reliability and validity of the dynamic risk outcome scales-short version for clients with mild intellectual disabilities or borderline intellectual functioning.动态风险结果量表-简表在轻度智力障碍或边缘智力功能障碍患者中的信度和效度。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2024 May;37(3):e13212. doi: 10.1111/jar.13212.
10
Utility of the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) in psychiatric outpatients with intellectual disabilities.简明症状量表(BSI)在精神科智力障碍门诊患者中的应用。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2012 Sep;56(9):843-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01440.x. Epub 2011 Jul 5.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review of measures examining the environments of persons with neurodevelopmental disorders in a supported housing setting.一项关于在支持性住房环境中对神经发育障碍患者的环境进行评估的措施的范围综述。
Int J Dev Disabil. 2022 Jul 19;70(4):559-570. doi: 10.1080/20473869.2022.2099508. eCollection 2024.
2
Group climate, aggressive incidents and coercion in a secure forensic setting for individuals with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning: A multilevel study.群体氛围、攻击事件与轻度智力障碍或边缘智力个体在安全司法环境中的强制:一项多层次研究
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2021 Jul;34(4):1026-1036. doi: 10.1111/jar.12841. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
3
Cross-sectional investigation of relationships between the organisational environment and challenging behaviours in support services for residents with intellectual disabilities.智力残疾居民支持服务中组织环境与挑战行为之间关系的横断面调查。
Heliyon. 2020 Aug 21;6(8):e04751. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04751. eCollection 2020 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Dynamic Risk Outcome Scales (DROS) for individuals with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning and externalizing behaviour problems.动态风险结果量表(DROS)在轻度智力障碍或边缘智力功能以及外化行为问题个体中的心理测量学特性。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2020 Jul;33(4):662-672. doi: 10.1111/jar.12546. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
2
The Relation Between Aggression and the Living Group Climate in a Forensic Treatment Unit for Adolescents: A Pilot Study.青少年法医治疗单元中攻击行为与生活群体氛围的关系:一项试点研究。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2018 May;62(7):1821-1837. doi: 10.1177/0306624X17712347. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
3
A Review of Questionnaire Measures for Assessing the Social Climate in Prisons and Forensic Psychiatric Hospitals.评估监狱和法医精神病医院社会环境的问卷调查方法综述
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2016 Sep;60(12):1376-405. doi: 10.1177/0306624X15578834. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
4
Measuring inappropriate responses of adolescents to problematic social situations in secure institutional and correctional youth care: a validation study of the TOPS-A.测量青少年在安全机构和矫正青少年关怀中对有问题的社会情境的不恰当反应:TOPS-A 的验证研究。
J Interpers Violence. 2013 May;28(8):1579-95. doi: 10.1177/0886260512468322. Epub 2012 Dec 24.
5
Levels of service user satisfaction in secure settings--a survey of the association between perceived social climate, perceived therapeutic relationship and satisfaction with forensic services.安全环境下服务使用者满意度水平——感知社会氛围、感知治疗关系与对法医服务满意度之间关系的调查。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2011 Nov;48(11):1349-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.05.011.
6
A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability.分析重测信度的基础。
Psychometrika. 1945;10:255-82. doi: 10.1007/BF02288892.
7
A review of therapist characteristics and techniques positively impacting the therapeutic alliance.对积极影响治疗联盟的治疗师特征和技术的综述。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2003 Feb;23(1):1-33. doi: 10.1016/s0272-7358(02)00146-0.
8
Coefficient alpha and related internal consistency reliability coefficients.系数α及相关的内部一致性信度系数。
Psychol Methods. 2000 Sep;5(3):343-55. doi: 10.1037/1082-989x.5.3.343.