Boysen Guy A, VanBergen Alexandra
Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Fredonia, USA.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2013 Jan;201(1):5-11. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31827aaf81.
The purpose of this study was to assess the scientific and etiological status of dissociative identity disorder (DID) by examining cases published from 2000 to 2010. In terms of scientific status, DID is a small but ongoing field of study. The review yielded 21 case studies and 80 empirical studies, presenting data on 1171 new cases of DID. A mean of 9 articles, each containing a mean of 17 new cases of DID, emerged each year. In terms of etiological status, many of the central criticisms of the disorder's validity remain unaddressed. Most cases of DID emerged from a small number of countries and clinicians. In addition, documented cases occurring outside treatment were almost nonexistent. Finally, people simulating DID in the laboratory were mostly indistinguishable from individuals with DID. Overall, DID is still a topic of study, but the research lacks the productivity and focus needed to resolve ongoing controversies surrounding the disorder.
本研究的目的是通过审查2000年至2010年发表的病例来评估分离性身份障碍(DID)的科学及病因学状况。就科学状况而言,DID是一个规模较小但仍在持续的研究领域。该综述产生了21个案例研究和80项实证研究,呈现了1171例DID新病例的数据。每年平均出现9篇文章,每篇文章平均包含17例DID新病例。就病因学状况而言,对该障碍有效性的许多核心批评仍未得到解决。大多数DID病例来自少数国家和临床医生。此外,几乎不存在治疗之外记录在案的病例。最后,在实验室中模拟DID的人与患有DID的个体大多难以区分。总体而言,DID仍是一个研究课题,但该研究缺乏解决围绕该障碍持续争议所需的成效和重点。