Oca Pernas R, Delgado Sánchez-Gracián C, Tardáguila de la Fuente G, Fernández Del Valle A, Silva Priegue N, González Vázquez M, Trinidad López C
Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital POVISA, Vigo, Pontevedra, España.
Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital POVISA, Vigo, Pontevedra, España.
Radiologia. 2014 Nov-Dec;56(6):541-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rx.2012.06.013. Epub 2012 Dec 29.
To compare the image quality and dose of radiation in two groups of patients undergoing CT angiography of the lower limbs, one with tube voltage of 80 kV and the other with tube voltage of 100 kV.
We performed CT angiography of the lower limbs in 60 patients with suspected peripheral arterial disease. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups; in one group, CT angiography was performed using a tube voltage of 80kV, whereas in the other it was performed using 100 kV. The remaining acquisition parameters were the same in both groups. The images were analyzed by quantifying vascular density (VD) and noise (N) and by calculating the quotients density/noise (QVDN) and contrast/noise (QCN). Two radiologists working independently evaluated the subjective quality of the images. We calculated the estimated effective dose (EED) based on the dose-length product (DLP).
In the group studied at 80 kV, VD was significantly higher (462.5 UH ± 95.6 vs. 372 UH ± 100.9; P<.001), QVDN was significantly higher (241.9 ± 48.1 vs. 194.3 ± 49.6; P<.001), and there were trends toward higher N (21.3 UH ± 13 vs. 16.3 UH ± 3.5; P=.098) and toward higher QCN (21.4 ± 12.1 vs. 22.9 ± 9.1; P=.15). No significant differences were found in the subjective quality of the images. The EED was significantly lower in the group studied at 80 kV (4.73 mSv ± 1.1 vs. 9.6 mSv ± 2.2; P<.001).
Using 80 kV instead of 100 kV for CT angiography of the lower limbs reduces the dose of radiation without affecting the diagnostic efficacy of the study.
比较两组接受下肢CT血管造影的患者的图像质量和辐射剂量,一组管电压为80 kV,另一组管电压为100 kV。
我们对60例疑似外周动脉疾病的患者进行了下肢CT血管造影。患者被随机分为两组;一组使用80kV管电压进行CT血管造影,另一组使用100 kV。两组的其余采集参数相同。通过量化血管密度(VD)和噪声(N)以及计算密度/噪声商(QVDN)和对比/噪声商(QCN)来分析图像。两名独立工作的放射科医生评估图像的主观质量。我们根据剂量长度乘积(DLP)计算估计有效剂量(EED)。
在80 kV组中,VD显著更高(462.5 UH±95.6对372 UH±100.9;P<.001),QVDN显著更高(241.9±48.1对194.3±49.6;P<.001),并且有N更高(21.3 UH±13对16.3 UH±3.5;P=.098)和QCN更高(21.4±12.1对22.9±9.1;P=.15)的趋势。图像的主观质量未发现显著差异。80 kV组的EED显著更低(4.73 mSv±1.1对9.6 mSv±2.2;P<.001)。
下肢CT血管造影使用80 kV而非100 kV可降低辐射剂量,且不影响研究的诊断效能。