Suppr超能文献

加拿大高级手法与整复物理治疗师的继续教育:感知需求调查

Continuing education for advanced manual and manipulative physiotherapists in Canada: a survey of perceived needs.

作者信息

Chau Joyce, Chadbourn Pamela, Hamel Rebecca, Mok Sherman, Robles Bradley, Chan Lianne, Cott Cheryl, Yeung Euson

机构信息

Four Seasons Physiotherapy, Etobicoke.

出版信息

Physiother Can. 2012 Winter;64(1):20-30. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2010-50. Epub 2012 Jan 31.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Our purpose was to determine advanced manual and manipulative physiotherapists' (AMPTs') current use and awareness of continuing education (CE) opportunities; to establish their perceived CE needs by identifying facilitators and barriers to participation; and to explore the association of demographics with CE needs.

METHODS

A questionnaire was e-mailed to 456 registered members of the Canadian Academy of Manipulative Physiotherapy. Data analyses using frequencies and percentages of total responses and t-tests for group comparisons were performed.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-three (29.2%) participants responded. Most lived in an urban region and worked predominantly in direct patient care. More respondents reported engaging in informal CE than in formal CE. Hands-on or practical workshops were the preferred CE format. Common barriers to CE included professional commitments and cost and time of travel; facilitators included interest in the topic and increasing knowledge and competency. AMPTs with less physical therapy experience found cost to be a greater barrier and were more interested in mentorship programs and CE as a means to obtain credentials.

CONCLUSIONS

AMPTs' preferred CE formats are inconsistent with the CE opportunities in which they participate. CE initiatives for AMPTs should include hands-on training and should account for time and cost to make CE opportunities more readily available to them.

摘要

目的

我们的目的是确定高级手法治疗物理治疗师(AMPTs)当前对继续教育(CE)机会的利用情况和认知;通过识别参与的促进因素和障碍来确定他们感知到的CE需求;并探索人口统计学与CE需求之间的关联。

方法

向加拿大手法治疗物理治疗学会的456名注册会员发送了问卷。使用总回复的频率和百分比以及用于组间比较的t检验进行数据分析。

结果

133名(29.2%)参与者做出了回应。大多数人居住在城市地区,主要从事直接的患者护理工作。更多的受访者报告参与非正式CE而非正式CE。实践操作工作坊是首选的CE形式。CE的常见障碍包括专业事务以及旅行成本和时间;促进因素包括对主题的兴趣以及知识和能力的提升。物理治疗经验较少的AMPTs认为成本是更大的障碍,并且对指导计划以及将CE作为获得资质的一种方式更感兴趣。

结论

AMPTs偏爱的CE形式与他们参与的CE机会不一致。针对AMPTs的CE倡议应包括实践培训,并应考虑时间和成本,以使CE机会更容易获得。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Clinician's Commentary on Salbach et al.(1.).临床医生对萨尔巴赫等人(1.)的评论。
Physiother Can. 2013 Spring;65(2):158-9. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2012-18CC.

本文引用的文献

6
Invited commentary.特邀评论。
Phys Ther. 2007 Aug;87(8):1036-7; author reply 1038. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20060053.ic.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验