Suppr超能文献

细菌在野外和临床中的合作:病原体的社会行为在实验室之外是否相关?

Bacterial cooperation in the wild and in the clinic: are pathogen social behaviours relevant outside the laboratory?

机构信息

School of Molecular Medical Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Bioessays. 2013 Feb;35(2):108-12. doi: 10.1002/bies.201200154. Epub 2012 Dec 27.

Abstract

Individual bacterial cells can communicate via quorum sensing, cooperate to harvest nutrients from their environment, form multicellular biofilms, compete over resources and even kill one another. When the environment that bacteria inhabit is an animal host, these social behaviours mediate virulence. Over the last decade, much attention has focussed on the ecology, evolution and pathology of bacterial cooperation, and the possibility that it could be exploited or destabilised to treat infections. But how far can we really extrapolate from theoretical predictions and laboratory experiments to make inferences about 'cooperative' behaviours in hosts and reservoirs? To determine the likely importance and evolution of cooperation 'in the wild', several questions must be addressed. A recent paper that reports the dynamics of bacterial cooperation and virulence in a field experiment provides an excellent nucleus for bringing together key empirical and theoretical results which help us to frame - if not completely to answer - these questions.

摘要

单个细菌细胞可以通过群体感应进行交流,合作从环境中获取营养物质,形成多细胞生物膜,争夺资源,甚至相互残杀。当细菌栖息的环境是动物宿主时,这些社交行为会影响其毒力。在过去的十年中,人们对细菌合作的生态学、进化和病理学,以及利用或破坏这种合作来治疗感染的可能性给予了极大关注。但是,我们究竟能在多大程度上从理论预测和实验室实验推断出宿主和储主中“合作”行为呢?为了确定合作在“野外”的可能重要性和进化,必须解决几个问题。最近的一篇论文报告了一项野外实验中细菌合作和毒力的动态,为汇集关键的经验和理论结果提供了极好的核心内容,这些结果帮助我们构建(即使不能完全回答)这些问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f8d/4267416/c112b181d0ba/bies0035-0108-f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验