• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性冠脉综合征后患者对二级预防药物治疗的依从性。

Patients' adherence to secondary prevention pharmacotherapy after acute coronary syndromes.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharm. 2013 Apr;35(2):275-80. doi: 10.1007/s11096-012-9735-y. Epub 2013 Jan 3.

DOI:10.1007/s11096-012-9735-y
PMID:23283596
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Secondary prevention pharmacotherapy improves outcomes after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, poor medication adherence is common, and various factors play a role in adherence.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate patients' level of adherence to evidence-based therapies at an average of 6 months after discharge for acs and to identify factors associated with self-reported non-adherence.

SETTING

This prospective study was conducted in the outpatient cardiac clinics of Hospital Pulau Pinang, located in Penang Island, a northern state in Malaysia.

METHOD

A random sample of ACS patients (n = 190) who had been discharged on a regimen of secondary preventive medications were included in this study. Six months after discharge and during their scheduled follow-up appointments to cardiac clinics, patients were interviewed using the translated eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

self-reported patients' adherence to medication.

RESULTS

Six months following their hospital discharge, only 35 patients (18.4 %) reported high adherence. Medium adherence was reported in majority of patients (51.1 %). Low adherence was reported in 58 patients (30.5 %). Forgetfulness was the most frequently reported reason for patients' non-adherence to their medications (23.2 %). Furthermore, this study identified 5 factors-namely age, employment status, ACS subtypes, number of comorbidities, and number of prescription medications per day-that may influence Patients' level of adherence to the prescribed regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings revealed a problem of non-adherence to secondary prevention medications among patients with ACS in Malaysia. Furthermore, this study demonstrates that older patients, unemployed patients, patients with more comorbid conditions, and those receiving multiple medications are less likely to adhere to their prescribed medications 6 months after hospital discharge.

摘要

背景

急性冠脉综合征(ACS)后,二级预防药物治疗可改善预后。然而,药物依从性差较为常见,多种因素会影响药物依从性。

目的

本研究旨在评估 ACS 患者出院后平均 6 个月时的抗栓治疗依从性,并确定与自述不依从相关的因素。

设置

本前瞻性研究在马来西亚北部槟城州的槟城医院的门诊心脏诊所进行。

方法

纳入了接受二级预防药物治疗出院的 ACS 患者(n=190)的随机样本。在出院后 6 个月且在预约心脏诊所就诊期间,使用翻译后的 Morisky 药物依从量表对患者进行访谈,以评估其自我报告的药物依从性。

主要观察指标

患者自述的药物依从性。

结果

出院后 6 个月时,仅 35 例患者(18.4%)报告依从性高。多数患者(51.1%)报告中依从性。58 例患者(30.5%)报告低依从性。忘记服药是患者不遵医嘱的最常见原因(23.2%)。此外,本研究确定了 5 个可能影响患者对处方方案依从性的因素,即年龄、就业状况、ACS 亚型、合并症数量和每天服用的处方药数量。

结论

我们的研究结果显示,马来西亚 ACS 患者存在二级预防药物治疗依从性问题。此外,本研究表明,年龄较大、失业、合并症较多以及服用多种药物的患者在出院后 6 个月时不太可能遵医嘱服药。

相似文献

1
Patients' adherence to secondary prevention pharmacotherapy after acute coronary syndromes.急性冠脉综合征后患者对二级预防药物治疗的依从性。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2013 Apr;35(2):275-80. doi: 10.1007/s11096-012-9735-y. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
2
Report: trends in adherence to secondary prevention medications in post-acute coronary syndrome patients.报告:急性冠状动脉综合征后患者二级预防药物的依从性趋势
Pak J Pharm Sci. 2015 Mar;28(2):641-6.
3
Improving patient adherence to secondary prevention medications 6 months after an acute coronary syndrome: observational cohort study.急性冠状动脉综合征后6个月提高患者对二级预防药物的依从性:观察性队列研究。
Intern Med J. 2018 May;48(5):541-549. doi: 10.1111/imj.13736.
4
Utilization of Evidence-Based Secondary Prevention Medications at the Time of Discharge in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) in Qatar.卡塔尔急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者出院时基于证据的二级预防药物的使用情况。
Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2016;14(4):394-403. doi: 10.2174/1570161114666160226150336.
5
Age-related differences in factors associated with the underuse of recommended medications in acute coronary syndrome patients at least one year after hospital discharge.出院至少一年后急性冠脉综合征患者推荐药物使用不足相关因素的年龄差异。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2014 Sep 24;14:127. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-14-127.
6
Multifaceted intervention to improve medication adherence and secondary prevention measures after acute coronary syndrome hospital discharge: a randomized clinical trial.多方面干预措施改善急性冠状动脉综合征出院后患者的用药依从性和二级预防措施:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Feb 1;174(2):186-93. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.12944.
7
Use of evidence-based therapy for the secondary prevention of acute coronary syndromes in Malaysian practice.在马来西亚的临床实践中,对急性冠脉综合征的二级预防采用基于证据的治疗。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2013 Aug;19(4):658-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01894.x. Epub 2012 Jul 29.
8
Optimising adherence to secondary prevention medications following acute coronary syndrome utilising telehealth cardiology pharmacist clinics: a matched cohort study.利用远程心脏病学药剂师诊所优化急性冠状动脉综合征患者二级预防药物的依从性:一项匹配队列研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2023 Jun;45(3):722-730. doi: 10.1007/s11096-023-01562-4. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
9
Adherence to evidence-based secondary prevention pharmacotherapy in patients after an acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review.急性冠状动脉综合征后患者对循证二级预防药物治疗的依从性:一项系统评价。
Heart Lung. 2015 Jul-Aug;44(4):299-308. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2015.02.004. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
10
Age and sex inequalities in the prescription of evidence-based pharmacological therapy following an acute coronary syndrome in Portugal: the EURHOBOP study.葡萄牙急性冠状动脉综合征后循证药物治疗处方中的年龄和性别不平等:EURHOBOP研究
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014 Nov;21(11):1401-8. doi: 10.1177/2047487313494580. Epub 2013 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Medication non-adherence in acute coronary syndrome patients in Duhok, Iraqi Kurdistan.伊拉克库尔德斯坦地区杜胡克急性冠状动脉综合征患者的药物治疗依从性
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Jan 30;87(2):471-476. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002790. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Online health information behaviour and its association with statin adherence in patients with high cardiovascular risk: A prospective cohort study.心血管疾病高风险患者的在线健康信息行为及其与他汀类药物依从性的关联:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Digit Health. 2024 Mar 21;10:20552076241241250. doi: 10.1177/20552076241241250. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
3
Association of antiseizure medication adherence with illness perceptions in adults with epilepsy.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of evidence-based therapy for the secondary prevention of acute coronary syndromes in Malaysian practice.在马来西亚的临床实践中,对急性冠脉综合征的二级预防采用基于证据的治疗。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2013 Aug;19(4):658-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01894.x. Epub 2012 Jul 29.
2
Adherence to medication among chronic patients in Middle Eastern countries: review of studies.中东国家慢性病患者的药物依从性:研究综述。
East Mediterr Health J. 2011 Apr;17(4):356-63.
3
The eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale MMAS: translation and validation of the Malaysian version.
抗癫痫药物治疗依从性与成年癫痫患者疾病认知的相关性。
Epilepsy Behav. 2023 Aug;145:109289. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109289. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
4
Effects of the Interactive Web-Based Video "Mon Coeur, Mon BASIC" on Drug Adherence of Patients With Myocardial Infarction: Randomized Controlled Trial.基于网络的互动视频“我的心脏,我的 BASIC”对心肌梗死患者药物依从性的影响:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 30;23(8):e21938. doi: 10.2196/21938.
5
Therapy Discontinuation after Myocardial Infarction.心肌梗死后的治疗中断
J Clin Med. 2020 Dec 19;9(12):4109. doi: 10.3390/jcm9124109.
6
Medication adherence and its determinants in patients after myocardial infarction.心肌梗死后患者的药物依从性及其决定因素。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 21;10(1):12028. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68915-1.
7
Accuracy of a screening tool for medication adherence: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8.一种药物依从性筛查工具的准确性:对莫利斯基药物依从性量表-8的系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 2;12(11):e0187139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187139. eCollection 2017.
8
Feasibility and Acceptability of a Positive Psychological Intervention for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.针对2型糖尿病患者的积极心理干预的可行性与可接受性
Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2016 May 5;18(3). doi: 10.4088/PCC.15m01902. eCollection 2016.
9
Evidence of poor adherence to secondary prevention after acute coronary syndromes: possible remedies through the application of new technologies.急性冠脉综合征后二级预防依从性差的证据:通过应用新技术的可能补救措施。
Open Heart. 2015 Jan 24;2(1):e000166. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2014-000166. eCollection 2015.
八条目 Morisky 用药依从性量表(MMAS):马来西亚版的翻译与验证。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010 Nov;90(2):216-21. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2010.08.012. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
4
Predictive validity of a medication adherence measure in an outpatient setting.门诊环境中药物依从性测量的预测效度。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2008 May;10(5):348-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2008.07572.x.
5
Medication adherence following coronary artery bypass graft surgery: assessment of beliefs and attitudes.冠状动脉搭桥手术后的药物依从性:信念与态度评估
Ann Pharmacother. 2008 Feb;42(2):192-9. doi: 10.1345/aph.1K497. Epub 2008 Jan 15.
6
[Effect of combined beta-blocker and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor treatment on 1-year survival after acute myocardial infarction: findings of the PRIAMHO-II registry].[β受体阻滞剂与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂联合治疗对急性心肌梗死后1年生存率的影响:PRIAMHO-II注册研究结果]
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2006 Apr;59(4):313-20.
7
Clopidogrel and aspirin versus aspirin alone for the prevention of atherothrombotic events.氯吡格雷与阿司匹林联用对比单用阿司匹林预防动脉粥样硬化血栓形成事件
N Engl J Med. 2006 Apr 20;354(16):1706-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa060989. Epub 2006 Mar 12.
8
Decade-long changes in the use of combination evidence-based medical therapy at discharge for patients surviving acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死存活患者出院时联合循证医学治疗使用情况的十年变化
Am Heart J. 2005 Oct;150(4):838-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.11.005.
9
Adherence to medications by patients after acute coronary syndromes.急性冠状动脉综合征后患者对药物的依从性。
Ann Pharmacother. 2005 Nov;39(11):1792-7. doi: 10.1345/aph.1G249. Epub 2005 Oct 4.
10
Adherence to evidence-based therapies after discharge for acute coronary syndromes: an ongoing prospective, observational study.急性冠状动脉综合征出院后对循证疗法的依从性:一项正在进行的前瞻性观察研究。
Am J Med. 2004 Jul 15;117(2):73-81. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.12.041.