Rocci M, Rocci A, Martignoni M, Albrektsson T, Barlattani A, Gargari M
Private practice in Chieti.
Oral Implantol (Rome). 2008 Apr;1(1):34-42. Epub 2008 Jun 16.
The aim of the present study was to compare two implant surfaces, the TiOblast (Astra Tech) surface, manufactured by blasting the surface and already present in literature and the Osseospeed (Astra Tech) surface, manufactured by blasting and treating the surface with fluoride ions and recently launched onto the market with the modified surfaces of the latest generation. This study is part of a more extensive research project whose protocol required the insertion of 10 couples of implants; thus in the present discussion partial data are being taken into consideration, with an eye at collecting more data in the future, regarding both microscopy and histomorphometric histological analysis on 5 couples of implants. The purpose of the study is to investigate how the modified surfaces of the latest generation can guarantee a greater osseointegration both from a qualitative and quantitative level compared to the surfaces presently used and that they may represent the first example of "bioactivity", that is, an active interaction with the processes of new bone formation and tissue healing.
本研究的目的是比较两种种植体表面，即通过表面喷砂处理的TiOblast（Astra Tech）表面（已见于文献）和通过表面喷砂并用氟离子处理的Osseospeed（Astra Tech）表面（最近作为最新一代的改良表面投放市场）。本研究是一个更广泛研究项目的一部分，该项目方案要求植入10对种植体；因此，在本讨论中，考虑的是部分数据，着眼于未来收集更多数据，涉及5对种植体的显微镜检查和组织形态计量学组织学分析。该研究的目的是调查与目前使用的表面相比，最新一代的改良表面如何能在定性和定量层面上保证更好的骨整合，以及它们是否可能代表“生物活性”的首个实例，即与新骨形成和组织愈合过程的积极相互作用。
