Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, Wilfrid Laurier University, 75 University Ave, W., Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Exp Brain Res. 2013 Mar;225(3):419-29. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3382-3. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
Young and older adults demonstrate differences in action when passing through confined spaces (Warren and Whang in J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 13:371-383, 1987; Hackney and Cinelli in Gait Posture 33:733-736, 2011). However, it is unknown whether or not these differences in actions exist during non-confined multiple obstacle avoidance tasks. The current study aimed to determine: (1) the differences in actions between young and older adults when given a choice in path selection and (2) establish the variables that may account for these differences in action. Older adults (N = 12) and young adults (N = 12) walked along a 10-m path towards a goal and avoided two vertical poles placed halfway down the path on either side of the midline (ranging between 0.6 and 1.8× shoulder width). Results revealed that in non-confined space, both age groups use body-scaled information to determine the passability of apertures and maintain similar Critical Points to those reported in confined aperture crossing (1.4 for young adults and 1.6 for older adults). Variability of the medial-lateral centre of mass movement (i.e. how much the trunk moved side to side) between the groups most likely accounted for the larger aperture sizes (i.e. Critical Points) required by the older adults to pass through the apertures. Therefore, it appears that body-scaled information may include an individual's knowledge of both actual body size and body sway magnitude.
年轻人和老年人在穿过狭窄空间时的动作表现存在差异(Warren 和 Whang 在 J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 13:371-383, 1987;Hackney 和 Cinelli 在 Gait Posture 33:733-736, 2011)。然而,在非受限的多障碍物回避任务中,这些动作差异是否存在尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定:(1)在路径选择上给予年轻人和老年人选择时,他们的动作存在哪些差异;(2)确定可能导致这些动作差异的变量。老年人(N=12)和年轻人(N=12)沿着 10 米长的路径走向目标,并避开放置在路径中间线两侧半途中的两个垂直杆(距离为 0.6 到 1.8 倍肩宽)。结果表明,在非受限空间中,两个年龄组都使用身体尺度信息来确定孔径的可通过性,并保持与在受限孔径穿越中报告的相似的关键点(年轻人为 1.4,老年人为 1.6)。两组之间的质心横向运动(即躯干向左右移动的幅度)的变异性很可能导致老年人需要通过孔径的孔径尺寸更大(即关键点)。因此,似乎身体尺度信息可能包括个体对实际身体大小和身体摆动幅度的了解。