社会科学。科学、新媒体与公众。 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Social science. Science, new media, and the public.

作者信息

Brossard Dominique, Scheufele Dietram A

机构信息

Department of Life Sciences Communication, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706-1215, USA.

出版信息

Science. 2013 Jan 4;339(6115):40-1. doi: 10.1126/science.1232329.

DOI:10.1126/science.1232329

PMID:23288529

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Social science. Science, new media, and the public.

Science. 2013 Jan 4;339(6115):40-1. doi: 10.1126/science.1232329.

Tweeting science and ethics: social media as a tool for constructive public engagement.

Am J Bioeth. 2010 May;10(5):30-1. doi: 10.1080/15265161003743497.

Science and the digital divide.

Science. 2005 Oct 21;310(5747):405. doi: 10.1126/science.1119500.

Biotechnology and the popular press: hype and the selling of science.

Trends Biotechnol. 2004 Jul;22(7):337-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.03.014.

Whose copy? Whose rights?

PLoS Biol. 2004 Jul;2(7):E228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020228. Epub 2004 Jul 13.

Open Access to data for a new, open science.

Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2012 Dec;48(4):713-6.

On making science freely available.

Science. 2003 Feb 28;299(5611):1314. doi: 10.1126/science.299.5611.1314.

NECOBELAC supporting Open Access, a path to open science.

Rev Salud Publica (Bogota). 2011 Dec;13(6):881-2.

Scientific publishing. NIH proposes 6-month public access to papers.

Science. 2004 Sep 10;305(5690):1548. doi: 10.1126/science.305.5690.1548b.

Readers' responses to "is there a place for medical blogs in a medical media company?".

MedGenMed. 2006;8(1):4; author reply 4.

引用本文的文献

The gender gap in scholarly self-promotion on social media.

Nat Commun. 2025 Jul 1;16(1):5552. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-60590-y.

Our changing information ecosystem for science and why it matters for effective science communication.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jul 8;122(27):e2400928121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2400928121. Epub 2025 Jun 30.

Invitation appeals and STEM academic scientists research participation: Findings from six survey experiments.

PLoS One. 2025 Jun 17;20(6):e0326331. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326331. eCollection 2025.

Visibility vs. virality and from hashtags to hysteria: how orthopaedic surgeons can surf the social media tsunami without drowning?

Int Orthop. 2025 Jun;49(6):1265-1274. doi: 10.1007/s00264-025-06554-9.

The media morphosis of science communication during crises.

Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 14;15(1):5506. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88973-7.

Communicating biodiversity research on YouTube: An experimental comparison of scientists and third-party presenters.

Public Underst Sci. 2025 Apr;34(3):380-398. doi: 10.1177/09636625241300646. Epub 2025 Jan 15.

The public mental representations of deepfake technology: An in-depth qualitative exploration through Quora text data analysis.

PLoS One. 2024 Dec 30;19(12):e0313605. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313605. eCollection 2024.

Forest 404: Using a BBC drama series to explore the impact of nature's changing soundscapes on human wellbeing and behavior.

Glob Environ Change. 2022 May;74:102497. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102497.

Promoting engagement with quality communication in social media.

PLoS One. 2022 Oct 13;17(10):e0275534. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275534. eCollection 2022.

The science of YouTube: What factors influence user engagement with online science videos?

PLoS One. 2022 May 25;17(5):e0267697. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267697. eCollection 2022.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验

相似文献

Social science. Science, new media, and the public.

Science. 2013 Jan 4;339(6115):40-1. doi: 10.1126/science.1232329.

Tweeting science and ethics: social media as a tool for constructive public engagement.

Am J Bioeth. 2010 May;10(5):30-1. doi: 10.1080/15265161003743497.

Science and the digital divide.

Science. 2005 Oct 21;310(5747):405. doi: 10.1126/science.1119500.

Biotechnology and the popular press: hype and the selling of science.

Trends Biotechnol. 2004 Jul;22(7):337-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.03.014.

Whose copy? Whose rights?

PLoS Biol. 2004 Jul;2(7):E228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020228. Epub 2004 Jul 13.

Open Access to data for a new, open science.

Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2012 Dec;48(4):713-6.

On making science freely available.

Science. 2003 Feb 28;299(5611):1314. doi: 10.1126/science.299.5611.1314.

NECOBELAC supporting Open Access, a path to open science.

Rev Salud Publica (Bogota). 2011 Dec;13(6):881-2.

Scientific publishing. NIH proposes 6-month public access to papers.

Science. 2004 Sep 10;305(5690):1548. doi: 10.1126/science.305.5690.1548b.

Readers' responses to "is there a place for medical blogs in a medical media company?".

MedGenMed. 2006;8(1):4; author reply 4.

引用本文的文献

The gender gap in scholarly self-promotion on social media.

Nat Commun. 2025 Jul 1;16(1):5552. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-60590-y.

Our changing information ecosystem for science and why it matters for effective science communication.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jul 8;122(27):e2400928121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2400928121. Epub 2025 Jun 30.

Invitation appeals and STEM academic scientists research participation: Findings from six survey experiments.

PLoS One. 2025 Jun 17;20(6):e0326331. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326331. eCollection 2025.

Visibility vs. virality and from hashtags to hysteria: how orthopaedic surgeons can surf the social media tsunami without drowning?

Int Orthop. 2025 Jun;49(6):1265-1274. doi: 10.1007/s00264-025-06554-9.

The media morphosis of science communication during crises.

Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 14;15(1):5506. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88973-7.

Communicating biodiversity research on YouTube: An experimental comparison of scientists and third-party presenters.

Public Underst Sci. 2025 Apr;34(3):380-398. doi: 10.1177/09636625241300646. Epub 2025 Jan 15.

The public mental representations of deepfake technology: An in-depth qualitative exploration through Quora text data analysis.

PLoS One. 2024 Dec 30;19(12):e0313605. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313605. eCollection 2024.

Forest 404: Using a BBC drama series to explore the impact of nature's changing soundscapes on human wellbeing and behavior.

Glob Environ Change. 2022 May;74:102497. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102497.

Promoting engagement with quality communication in social media.

PLoS One. 2022 Oct 13;17(10):e0275534. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275534. eCollection 2022.

The science of YouTube: What factors influence user engagement with online science videos?

PLoS One. 2022 May 25;17(5):e0267697. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267697. eCollection 2022.