Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Venice, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 13;17(10):e0275534. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275534. eCollection 2022.
The COVID-19 pandemic made explicit the issues of communicating science in an information ecosystem dominated by social media platforms. One of the fundamental communication challenges of our time is to provide the public with reliable content and contrast misinformation. This paper investigates how social media can become an effective channel to promote engagement and (re)build trust. To measure the social response to quality communication, we conducted an experimental study to test a set of science communication recommendations on Facebook and Twitter. The experiment involved communication practitioners and social media managers from select countries in Europe, applying and testing such recommendations for five months. Here we analyse their feedback in terms of adoption and show that some differences emerge across platforms, topics, and recommendation categories. To evaluate these recommendations' effect on users, we measure their response to quality content, finding that the median engagement is generally higher, especially on Twitter. The results indicate that quality communication strategies may elicit positive feedback on social media. A data-driven and co-designed approach in developing counter-strategies is thus promising in tackling misinformation.
新冠疫情大流行凸显了在社交媒体平台主导的信息生态系统中传播科学的问题。当今时代的一个基本传播挑战是为公众提供可靠的内容并与错误信息形成对比。本文研究了社交媒体如何成为促进参与和(重建)信任的有效渠道。为了衡量社交媒体对优质内容的响应,我们在 Facebook 和 Twitter 上进行了一项实验研究,以测试一系列科学传播建议。该实验涉及来自欧洲选定国家的传播从业者和社交媒体经理,他们在五个月内应用和测试这些建议。在这里,我们根据采用情况分析他们的反馈,并发现不同平台、主题和建议类别之间存在一些差异。为了评估这些建议对用户的影响,我们衡量了他们对优质内容的反应,发现中位数参与度普遍更高,尤其是在 Twitter 上。结果表明,优质传播策略可能会在社交媒体上引发积极反馈。因此,在制定对抗策略方面采用数据驱动和共同设计的方法在应对错误信息方面很有前景。