Substituting non-HDL cholesterol with LDL as a guide for lipid-lowering therapy increases the number of patients with indication for therapy.

AIM

Our objective was to assess the number of patients with an indication for lipid-lowering therapy according to their non-HDL cholesterol (N-HDL-C) (>130 mg/dL) concentrations despite on-target LDL (≤100 mg/dL) values determined using ultracentrifugation (UC) or direct enzymatic methods (DM).

METHODS

In 1590 patients we studied the lipid profile using standard biochemical methods and sequential UC (N = 637) or triglyceride (TG) independent DM (N = 953). The indications for lipid-lowering therapy were compared by evaluating the real LDL concentration or N-HDL-C concentration.

RESULTS

The LDL/N-HDL-C correlation significantly decreased with increasing triglyceride concentrations: normal (r = 0.924, p < 0.001), 150-400 mg/dL (r = 0.825, p < 0.001) and higher than 400 mg/dL (r = 0.460, p < 0.001) (p < 0.001). The percentage of patients with an N-HDL-C concentration above the recommended level, despite having an LDL concentration that was on target, also increased significantly across the TG tertiles (3.1%, 15.6% and 57.%, respectively; p < 0.001). Of the patients with a TG level above 400 mg/dL and an LDL concentration that was on target, 86% had an N-HDL-C concentration above 130 mg/dL. Of the patients with a TG level above 400 and an N-HDL-C concentration qualifying for therapy, 40% had an LDL concentration that was on target. The ApoB concentration had a stronger concordance with the LDL concentration than N-HDL-C.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the N-HDL-C concentration as a therapeutic target in hypertriglyceridemic patients almost doubled the number of patients requiring treatment. The ApoB concentration had a better association with LDL when determining the need for lipid-lowering therapy.