Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Jul;38(1):154-60. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23953. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
To determine, with histopathological findings of radical prostatectomy as reference, whether diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) using b = 2000 s/mm(2) for 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is superior to the use of b = 1000 s/mm(2) for prostate cancer detection.
This study evaluated 73 patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer. All patients underwent preoperative 3-T MRI using T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and DWI (b = 0, 1000, 2000 s/mm(2) ). The following three sets of images were evaluated separately by two radiologists: protocol A (T2WI alone), protocol B (T2WI and DWI with b = 1000 s/mm(2) ), and protocol C (T2WI and DWI with b = 2000 s/mm(2) ). For estimation of diagnostic capability, area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was calculated.
A total of 341 cancer foci were found in the prostectomy specimens of 73 patients. Reader 1 rated AUCs of the three sets as; A 0.66, B 0.77, C 0.80. ROC analysis showed significant differences among the three protocols (A vs. B vs. C: P < 0.0001, A vs. B: P < 0.0001, B vs. C: P < 0.0001).
The use of b = 2000 s/mm(2) for DWI with 3-T MRI is diagnostically superior to that of b = 1000 s/mm(2) for prostate cancer detection.
以根治性前列腺切除术的组织病理学发现为参照,确定用于 3-T 磁共振成像(MRI)的 b = 2000 s/mm² 的弥散加权成像(DWI)是否优于用于前列腺癌检测的 b = 1000 s/mm²。
本研究评估了 73 例经活检证实的前列腺癌患者。所有患者均接受术前 3-T MRI 检查,包括 T2 加权成像(T2WI)和 DWI(b = 0、1000、2000 s/mm²)。两位放射科医生分别单独评估以下三组图像:方案 A(仅 T2WI)、方案 B(T2WI 和 b = 1000 s/mm² 的 DWI)和方案 C(T2WI 和 b = 2000 s/mm² 的 DWI)。为了评估诊断能力,计算了受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)。
73 例患者的前列腺切除标本中共发现 341 个癌灶。读者 1 对三组图像的 AUC 评分分别为:A 组 0.66、B 组 0.77、C 组 0.80。ROC 分析显示三组方案之间存在显著差异(A 组与 B 组与 C 组:P < 0.0001,A 组与 B 组:P < 0.0001,B 组与 C 组:P < 0.0001)。
用于 3-T MRI 的 b = 2000 s/mm² 的 DWI 比用于前列腺癌检测的 b = 1000 s/mm² 具有更好的诊断价值。