• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

EZ 型支气管堵塞器与左侧双腔管用于单肺通气的效果、功效和安全性比较。

Efficiency, efficacy, and safety of EZ-blocker compared with left-sided double-lumen tube for one-lung ventilation.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 2013 Mar;118(3):550-61. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182834f2d.

DOI:10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182834f2d
PMID:23299364
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Double-lumen tubes (DLTs) or bronchial blockers are commonly used for one-lung ventilation. DLTs are sometimes difficult or even impossible to introduce, and the incidence of postoperative hoarseness and airway injuries is higher. Bronchial blockers are more difficult to position and need more frequent intraoperative repositioning. The design of a Y-shaped bronchial blocker, the EZ-Blocker (Teleflex Life Sciences Ltd., Athlone, Ireland) (EZB), combines some advantages of both techniques. The objective of this study was to assess whether EZB performs clinically better than left-sided DLTs (Broncho-cath; Mallinckrodt, Athlone, Ireland) without causing more injury. Primary outcome was the frequency of initial malpositions.

METHODS

Eligible patients were adults scheduled for surgery requiring one-lung ventilation who met criteria for placement of both devices. In this parallel trial, 100 consecutive and blinded patients were assigned randomly using a computer-generated list to two groups. The incidence of malposition and ease and time of placement were recorded. Blinded assessors investigated quality of lung deflation, postoperative complaints, and damage to the airway.

RESULTS

Placement of a DLT was unsuccessful twice. The incidence of initial malposition was high and comparable between EZBs (37 of 50) and DLTs (42 of 49) (P = 0.212). Placing single-lumen tubes and EZBs took more time but was rated easier. Quality of lung deflation was comparable. Fewer patients in the EZB group complained of sore throat at day 1. There was a higher incidence of tracheal hematoma and redness and bronchial hematoma in the DLT group.

CONCLUSIONS

The EZB is an efficient and effective device for one-lung ventilation and causes less injury and sore throat than a DLT.

摘要

背景

双腔管(DLT)或支气管阻塞器常用于单肺通气。有时 DLT 插入困难甚至不可能,术后声音嘶哑和气道损伤的发生率较高。支气管阻塞器定位更困难,需要更频繁的术中重新定位。Y 形支气管阻塞器 EZ-Blocker(Teleflex Life Sciences Ltd.,Athlone,Ireland)(EZB)的设计结合了两种技术的一些优势。本研究旨在评估 EZB 是否在不造成更多损伤的情况下比左侧 DLT(Broncho-cath;Mallinckrodt,Athlone,Ireland)具有更好的临床效果。主要结局是初始位置不正的频率。

方法

符合单肺通气要求并符合两种器械放置标准的手术成年患者为合格患者。在这项平行试验中,100 名连续且盲法患者使用计算机生成的列表随机分为两组。记录位置不正的发生率以及放置的难易程度和时间。盲法评估者调查了肺萎陷的质量、术后投诉以及气道损伤情况。

结果

两次未能放置 DLT。EZB(50 例中的 37 例)和 DLT(49 例中的 42 例)的初始位置不正发生率高且相似(P=0.212)。放置单腔管和 EZB 花费的时间更多,但难度评级较低。肺萎陷质量相似。EZB 组第 1 天咽痛的患者较少。DLT 组气管血肿、红肿和支气管血肿的发生率较高。

结论

EZB 是一种有效的单肺通气装置,与 DLT 相比,造成的损伤和咽痛更少。

相似文献

1
Efficiency, efficacy, and safety of EZ-blocker compared with left-sided double-lumen tube for one-lung ventilation.EZ 型支气管堵塞器与左侧双腔管用于单肺通气的效果、功效和安全性比较。
Anesthesiology. 2013 Mar;118(3):550-61. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182834f2d.
2
Bronchial blocker compared to double-lumen tube for one-lung ventilation during thoracoscopy.胸腔镜检查期间,支气管阻塞器与双腔管用于单肺通气的比较。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001 Feb;45(2):250-4.
3
Bronchial Blocker Versus Left Double-Lumen Endotracheal Tube for One-Lung Ventilation in Right Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery.在右胸电视辅助胸腔镜手术中,支气管阻塞器与左侧双腔气管导管用于单肺通气的比较。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2018 Feb;32(1):297-301. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.07.026. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
4
Choosing a lung isolation device for thoracic surgery: a randomized trial of three bronchial blockers versus double-lumen tubes.胸外科手术中肺隔离装置的选择:三种支气管封堵器与双腔气管导管的随机试验
Anesth Analg. 2009 Apr;108(4):1097-101. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181999339.
5
Comparison of left double lumen tube and y-shaped and double-ended bronchial blocker for one lung ventilation in thoracic surgery-a randomised controlled clinical trial.左双腔管与 Y 型双端支气管阻塞器在胸外科单肺通气中的比较:一项随机对照临床试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Apr 2;22(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01637-1.
6
Sore throat or hoarse voice with bronchial blockers or double-lumen tubes for lung isolation: a randomised, prospective trial.使用支气管阻塞器或双腔管进行肺隔离时出现的喉咙痛或声音嘶哑:一项随机前瞻性试验。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2009 May;37(3):441-6.
7
Intubation with VivaSight or conventional left-sided double-lumen tubes: a randomized trial.使用VivaSight或传统左侧双腔管进行插管:一项随机试验。
Can J Anaesth. 2015 Jul;62(7):762-9. doi: 10.1007/s12630-015-0329-8. Epub 2015 Feb 6.
8
Randomized clinical trial comparing double-lumen tube and EZ-Blocker for single-lung ventilation.随机对照临床试验比较双腔管和 EZ-Blocker 在单肺通气中的应用。
Br J Anaesth. 2011 Jun;106(6):896-902. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer086. Epub 2011 Apr 14.
9
The effects of thermal softening of double-lumen endobronchial tubes on postoperative sore throat, hoarseness and vocal cord injuries: a prospective double-blind randomized trial.双腔支气管导管热软化对术后咽痛、声音嘶哑和声带损伤的影响:一项前瞻性双盲随机试验。
Br J Anaesth. 2016 Feb;116(2):282-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev414.
10
[A comparison of double-lumen endotracheal tube with univent blocker and bronchial blocker during thoracic surgical anesthesia].[胸科手术麻醉期间双腔气管导管与单腔支气管阻塞器及支气管阻塞器的比较]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2012 Sep 18;92(35):2481-4.

引用本文的文献

1
90° versus 110° rotation of left double lumen tube for endobronchial intubation: a randomized controlled trial.左双腔支气管导管90°与110°旋转用于支气管内插管的随机对照试验
J Thorac Dis. 2025 Jul 31;17(7):4724-4731. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2025-240. Epub 2025 Jul 24.
2
Efficiency and safety of double-lumen bronchial tube and bronchial blocker for one-lung ventilation in patients with thoracic surgery: a meta-analysis.双腔支气管导管与支气管封堵器用于胸外科手术患者单肺通气的有效性和安全性:一项荟萃分析
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 May 31;25(1):281. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03144-5.
3
Comparison of clinical characteristics of different ventilation devices for one-lung ventilation in adults: a network meta-analysis.
成人单肺通气不同通气装置临床特征的比较:一项网状Meta分析
Int J Surg. 2025 Jun 1;111(6):3989-4001. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002378. Epub 2025 May 12.
4
Postoperative Sore Throat After Tracheal Intubation: An Updated Narrative Review and Call for Action.气管插管后咽痛:最新叙述性综述及行动呼吁
J Pain Res. 2025 May 6;18:2285-2306. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S498933. eCollection 2025.
5
Effects of Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant in Preoperative Ultrasound-Guided Internal Branch of Superior Laryngeal Nerve Block on Postoperative Sore Throat and Hemodynamics in Patients With Double-Lumen Endotracheal Intubation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.右美托咪定作为术前超声引导下喉上神经内支阻滞辅助用药对双腔气管插管患者术后咽痛及血流动力学的影响:一项随机对照试验
J Pain Res. 2025 Jan 17;18:229-241. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S498538. eCollection 2025.
6
Bibliometric and knowledge map analysis of one lung ventilation.单肺通气的文献计量学与知识图谱分析
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Sep 30;16(9):6123-6139. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-645. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
7
A novel maneuver to correct the position of an EZ-Blocker endobronchial blocker.一种纠正EZ型支气管内封堵器位置的新手法。
Can J Anaesth. 2024 Jul;71(7):1053-1054. doi: 10.1007/s12630-024-02767-5. Epub 2024 May 13.
8
Individualized rotation of left double lumen endobronchial tube to improve placement success rate: a randomized controlled trial.个体化转动左侧双腔支气管导管以提高置管成功率:一项随机对照试验。
Respir Res. 2024 Apr 25;25(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-02799-x.
9
Comparison of early postoperative pulmonary complications between two-lung ventilation with artificial pneumothorax and one-lung ventilation with bronchial blockade in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.微创食管切除术患者中人工气胸双肺通气与支气管封堵单肺通气术后早期肺部并发症的比较:一项回顾性倾向评分匹配队列研究
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Mar 29;16(3):1777-1786. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-1667. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
10
EZ blocker failure in short-stature patient: Is the gap sufficient? - A case study.矮小患者中EZ阻滞剂失效:间隙是否足够?——一项病例研究。
Indian J Anaesth. 2023 Aug;67(8):756-757. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_786_22. Epub 2023 Aug 15.