Royal Hospital for Neuro-disability, London, UK.
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2013;23(2):287-98. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2012.753395. Epub 2013 Jan 10.
In the behavioural assessment of disorders of consciousness (DOC), best practice is for several different assessment tools to be used to encourage a variety of different responses indicative of awareness. Anecdotal evidence suggests a range of musical stimuli may be particularly effective in eliciting responses to guide the assessment process, although comparative data regarding behavioural domains is lacking. This study examined 42 concurrent records of patients assessed using the Sensory Modality Assessment and Rehabilitation Technique (SMART), and the Music Therapy Assessment Tool for Awareness in Disorders of Consciousness (MATADOC) to explore the relationship between diagnosis and behavioural characteristics of the cohort. Whilst the two tools produced a high level of agreement in diagnostic outcome (Spearman Rho .80), divergent diagnosis and weaker correlations between behavioural response items highlight contrasting sensitivities of the tools. Whilst MATADOC has higher sensitivity within auditory and visual domains relative to SMART, SMART has higher sensitivity in the motor domain. The significant contribution of musical response items in MATADOC, and the tactile response item in SMART, indicates both tools provide unique behavioural data predictive of awareness. Multidisciplinary assessment using SMART and MATADOC provides complementary data contributing to a fuller understanding of a patient's level of awareness.
在意识障碍(DOC)的行为评估中,最好使用多种不同的评估工具来鼓励各种不同的反应,以表明意识的存在。有传闻证据表明,一系列音乐刺激可能特别有效地引发反应,以指导评估过程,尽管缺乏关于行为领域的比较数据。本研究检查了 42 份同时使用感觉模态评估和康复技术(SMART)以及意识障碍音乐治疗评估工具(MATADOC)评估的患者记录,以探讨诊断与队列行为特征之间的关系。虽然这两种工具在诊断结果上具有高度一致性(Spearman Rho.80),但诊断上的差异和行为反应项目之间的相关性较弱,突出了这两种工具的敏感性不同。虽然 MATADOC 在听觉和视觉领域相对于 SMART 具有更高的敏感性,但 SMART 在运动领域具有更高的敏感性。MATADOC 中的音乐反应项目和 SMART 中的触觉反应项目具有显著意义,表明这两种工具都提供了独特的行为数据,可预测意识。使用 SMART 和 MATADOC 的多学科评估提供了互补的数据,有助于更全面地了解患者的意识水平。