Boyer College of Music and Dance, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Department of Computer Science, School of Engineering, Computer, and Mathematical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, East Auckland, New Zealand.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Jul;104(7):1107-1114. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.03.010. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
To examine (1) the concurrent validity of the Music Therapy Assessment Tool for Awareness in Disorders of Consciousness (MATADOC) with the criterion standard Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) for outcomes of awareness in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (PDoC), (2) the relationship between MATADOC items and CRS-R function subscales in similar domains, and (3) determine if items/function subscales measure different constructs.
A prospective multicentric blinded study with repeated concurrent measures.
Three inpatient rehabilitation units.
Convenience sample of 74 adults with PDoC (N=74).
The MATADOC protocol elicits behavioral responsiveness using live music in 5 tasks. A total score ranges 0-10 scoring behaviors across 14-items. The CRS-R uses a language-based protocol and scores observed responses ranging from 0-23 in 6 function subscales. Both measures were delivered at 4 concurrent time points over 2 weeks.
Fair (κ=0.238, P=.006) ranging to moderate (κ=0.419, P<.001) significant agreement was found between CRS-R and MATADOC diagnostic outcomes. Fair-borderline moderate significant agreement was found for overall diagnostic outcomes across all diagnostic categories (κ=0.397, P=.001). There was moderate significant agreement between measures for motor scores (0.551≤κ≤0.571, P<.001) and visual outcomes (0.192≤κ≤0.415, .001≤P<.005) but no agreement for item/function subscale outcomes assessing auditory responsiveness. Exploratory factor analysis of all items showed 2 factors, suggesting that MATADOC and CRS-R measure the same underlying latent variable (awareness) in different ways and could complement each other for diagnosis and intervention purposes. This was supported by scale analysis, which showed increased reliability when the 2 scales are used together rather than separately.
Unlike the CRS-R, the music-based MATADOC scores auditory localization for complexity of response and categorizes these behaviors as conscious rather than reflexive. The MATADOC may supplement the CRS-R, having a particular role in interdisciplinary programming for providing a more robust assessment of auditory responsiveness because of using nonverbal musical stimuli.
(1)检验音乐治疗意识障碍评估工具(MATADOC)与意识障碍后持续时间较长患者的意识障碍恢复量表修订版(CRS-R)这一标准之间的同时效度,(2)MATADOC 项目与类似领域的 CRS-R 功能子量表之间的关系,以及(3)确定项目/功能子量表是否测量不同的结构。
前瞻性多中心盲法研究,重复同时进行测量。
三家住院康复单位。
便利抽样的 74 名意识障碍后持续时间较长的成年人(N=74)。
MATADOC 方案使用 5 项任务中的现场音乐引出行为反应。总分范围为 0-10 分,在 14 项中对行为进行评分。CRS-R 使用基于语言的方案,并对观察到的 6 个功能子量表的反应进行评分,范围为 0-23 分。两种测量方法均在 2 周内的 4 个同时时间点进行。
CRS-R 和 MATADOC 诊断结果之间存在中度到显著的一致性(κ=0.238,P=.006),从公平(κ=0.238,P=.006)到中等(κ=0.419,P<.001)。在所有诊断类别中,对总体诊断结果的一致性为中等至边缘中度(κ=0.397,P=.001)。在运动评分(0.551≤κ≤0.571,P<.001)和视觉评分(0.192≤κ≤0.415,P<.005)方面,测量方法之间存在中度到显著的一致性,但评估听觉反应的项目/功能子量表的一致性没有。对所有项目进行的探索性因子分析显示有 2 个因素,表明 MATADOC 和 CRS-R 以不同的方式测量相同的潜在变量(意识),并且可以互补,用于诊断和干预目的。这得到了量表分析的支持,当将两种量表一起使用而不是单独使用时,量表的可靠性会提高。
与 CRS-R 不同,基于音乐的 MATADOC 对反应复杂性进行评分,对听觉定位进行评分,并将这些行为归类为有意识的行为,而不是反射性的行为。MATADOC 可能会补充 CRS-R,因为它在提供更全面的听觉反应评估方面具有特殊作用,因为它使用非语言音乐刺激。