• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项多中心、随机、对照研究评估预防性依那西普对腹股沟疝修补术后疼痛的影响。

A multicenter, randomized, controlled study evaluating preventive etanercept on postoperative pain after inguinal hernia repair.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 550 North Broadway, Suite 301, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2013 Feb;116(2):455-62. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318273f71c. Epub 2013 Jan 9.

DOI:10.1213/ANE.0b013e318273f71c
PMID:23302973
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) affects between 5% and 70% of surgical patients, depending on the surgery. There is no reliable treatment for CPSP, which has led to an increased emphasis on prevention. In this study, we sought to determine whether preventive etanercept can decrease the magnitude of postoperative pain and reduce the incidence of CPSP.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter, randomized study in 77 patients comparing subcutaneous etanercept 50 mg administered 90 minutes before inguinal hernia surgery with saline. Patients, surgeons, anesthesiologists, the injecting physician, nursing staff, and evaluators were blinded. The primary outcome measure was a 24-hour numerical rating scale pain score. Secondary outcome measures were postanesthesia care unit pain scores, 24-hour opioid requirements, time to first analgesic, and pain scores recorded at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.

RESULTS

Mean 24-hour pain scores were 3.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.2-4.6) in the etanercept and 3.9 (95% CI, 2.6-4.0) in the control group (P=0.22). The mean number of analgesic pills used in the first 24 hours was 4.0 (SD, 2.8) in the treatment versus 5.8 (SD, 4.2) in the control group (P=0.03). At 1 month, 10 patients (29%) in the treatment group reported pain versus 21 (49%) control patients (P=0.08). The presence of pain at 1 month was significantly associated with pain at 3 months (hazard ratio, 0.74; 99% CI, 0.52-0.97; P=0.03).

CONCLUSION

Although preventive etanercept was superior to saline in reducing postoperative pain on some measures, the effect sizes were small, transient, and not statistically significant. Different dosing regimens in a larger population should be explored in future studies.

摘要

背景

慢性术后疼痛(CPSP)影响 5%至 70%的手术患者,具体取决于手术类型。目前尚无可靠的 CPSP 治疗方法,因此人们越来越重视预防。在这项研究中,我们旨在确定预防性依那西普是否可以减轻术后疼痛的严重程度并降低 CPSP 的发生率。

方法

我们在 77 名患者中进行了一项多中心、随机研究,比较了皮下注射依那西普 50mg 与生理盐水,分别在腹股沟疝手术前 90 分钟给药。患者、外科医生、麻醉师、注射医师、护士和评估人员均处于盲态。主要观察指标为 24 小时数字评分量表疼痛评分。次要观察指标为麻醉后护理病房疼痛评分、24 小时阿片类药物需求、首次镇痛时间以及术后 1 个月、3 个月、6 个月和 12 个月的疼痛评分。

结果

依那西普组的平均 24 小时疼痛评分为 3.3(95%置信区间[CI],3.2-4.6),对照组为 3.9(95%CI,2.6-4.0)(P=0.22)。治疗组在 24 小时内使用的镇痛药片数为 4.0(SD,2.8),对照组为 5.8(SD,4.2)(P=0.03)。治疗组在术后 1 个月时有 10 名(29%)患者报告疼痛,对照组为 21 名(49%)(P=0.08)。1 个月时存在疼痛与 3 个月时疼痛明显相关(风险比,0.74;99%CI,0.52-0.97;P=0.03)。

结论

尽管在某些措施上,预防性依那西普在减轻术后疼痛方面优于生理盐水,但治疗效果的差异较小、短暂,且无统计学意义。在未来的研究中,应探讨更大人群中不同的给药方案。

相似文献

1
A multicenter, randomized, controlled study evaluating preventive etanercept on postoperative pain after inguinal hernia repair.一项多中心、随机、对照研究评估预防性依那西普对腹股沟疝修补术后疼痛的影响。
Anesth Analg. 2013 Feb;116(2):455-62. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318273f71c. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
2
A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of intravenous ibuprofen 400 and 800 mg every 6 hours in the management of postoperative pain.一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,研究静脉注射布洛芬 400 和 800 毫克,每 6 小时一次,用于治疗术后疼痛。
Clin Ther. 2009 Sep;31(9):1922-35. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.08.026.
3
Randomized, controlled, blinded trial of Tisseel/Tissucol for mesh fixation in patients undergoing Lichtenstein technique for primary inguinal hernia repair: results of the TIMELI trial.随机、对照、盲法试验研究 Tisseel/Tissucol 在接受李金斯坦技术行原发性腹股沟疝修补术患者中用于网片固定的效果:TIMELI 试验结果。
Ann Surg. 2012 Apr;255(4):650-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824b32bf.
4
Randomized clinical trial of dexamethasone versus placebo in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.随机对照临床试验:地塞米松与安慰剂在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中的应用比较。
Br J Surg. 2012 Oct;99(10):1374-80. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8876.
5
Diclofenac potassium liquid-filled soft gelatin capsules in the management of patients with postbunionectomy pain: a Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted over 5 days.双氯芬酸钾充液软胶囊治疗跗骨后切除术后疼痛的 III 期、多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究:为期 5 天。
Clin Ther. 2009 Oct;31(10):2072-85. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.09.011.
6
Hypoalgesic effect of the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation following inguinal herniorrhaphy: a randomized, controlled trial.腹股沟疝修补术后经皮电刺激神经的镇痛效果:一项随机对照试验。
J Pain. 2008 Jul;9(7):623-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.01.337. Epub 2008 Apr 3.
7
Efficacy of etanercept delivered by perispinal administration for chronic back and/or neck disc-related pain: a study of clinical observations in 143 patients.经椎旁给药的依那西普治疗慢性腰和/或颈椎间盘相关疼痛的疗效:143例患者的临床观察研究
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Jul;20(7):1075-85. doi: 10.1185/030079903125004286.
8
Sutureless fixation with fibrin glue of lightweight mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: effect on postoperative pain: a double-blind, randomized trial versus standard heavyweight mesh.开放式腹股沟疝修补术中使用纤维蛋白胶无缝线固定轻质网片对术后疼痛的影响:一项双盲、随机试验对比标准重质网片。
Surgery. 2013 Jan;153(1):126-30. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.06.024. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
9
Ilioinguinal nerve excision in open mesh repair of inguinal hernia--results of a randomized clinical trial: simple solution for a difficult problem?腹股沟疝开放补片修补术中髂腹股沟神经切除术——一项随机临床试验的结果:解决难题的简单方法?
Am J Surg. 2008 Jun;195(6):735-40. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.09.037. Epub 2008 Apr 28.
10
Randomized clinical trial of chronic pain after the transinguinal preperitoneal technique compared with Lichtenstein's method for inguinal hernia repair.经 Transinguinal 腹膜前技术与 Lichtenstein 法治疗腹股沟疝修补术后慢性疼痛的随机临床试验比较。
Br J Surg. 2012 Oct;99(10):1365-73. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8862.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols in Orthopaedic Surgery: Opioids or Not Opioids?骨科手术中的加速康复(ERAS)方案:使用阿片类药物还是不使用?
J Pain Res. 2025 Mar 28;18:1683-1695. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S496891. eCollection 2025.
2
Chronic postsurgical inguinal pain: incidence and diagnostic biomarkers from a large German national claims database.慢性术后腹股沟疼痛:来自德国一个大型全国性索赔数据库的发病率和诊断生物标志物
Br J Anaesth. 2025 Jun;134(6):1746-1755. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.11.048. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
3
Mechanisms and Therapeutic Prospects of Microglia-Astrocyte Interactions in Neuropathic Pain Following Spinal Cord Injury.
脊髓损伤后神经性疼痛中微胶质细胞-星形胶质细胞相互作用的机制与治疗前景
Mol Neurobiol. 2025 Apr;62(4):4654-4676. doi: 10.1007/s12035-024-04562-1. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
4
Molecular targets in bone cancer pain: a systematic review of inflammatory cytokines.骨癌痛的分子靶点:炎症细胞因子的系统评价。
J Mol Med (Berl). 2024 Sep;102(9):1063-1088. doi: 10.1007/s00109-024-02464-2. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
5
Research design considerations for chronic pain prevention clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations.慢性疼痛预防临床试验的研究设计考量:IMMPACT建议
Pain Rep. 2021 Jan 21;6(1):e895. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000895. eCollection 2021.
6
Targeting toll-like receptor-4 (TLR4)-an emerging therapeutic target for persistent pain states.靶向 Toll 样受体 4(TLR4)——一种新兴的持续性疼痛状态治疗靶点。
Pain. 2018 Oct;159(10):1908-1915. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001306.
7
International guidelines for groin hernia management.腹股沟疝治疗的国际指南。
Hernia. 2018 Feb;22(1):1-165. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
8
Research design considerations for chronic pain prevention clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations.慢性疼痛预防临床试验的研究设计考量:IMMPACT建议
Pain. 2015 Jul;156(7):1184-1197. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000191.
9
Preventive analgesia and novel strategies for the prevention of chronic post-surgical pain.预防性镇痛和预防慢性术后痛的新策略。
Drugs. 2015 Mar;75(4):339-51. doi: 10.1007/s40265-015-0365-2.
10
Pain control following inguinal herniorrhaphy: current perspectives.腹股沟疝修补术后的疼痛控制:当前观点
J Pain Res. 2014 May 29;7:277-90. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S47005. eCollection 2014.