• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护士对提供心肺复苏患者决策支持的认知评估。

Evaluation of nurses' perceptions on providing patient decision support with cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

作者信息

Pyl Nicole, Menard Prudy

机构信息

The Ottawa Hospital, General Campus, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1H 8L6.

出版信息

ISRN Nurs. 2012;2012:591541. doi: 10.5402/2012/591541. Epub 2012 Dec 5.

DOI:10.5402/2012/591541
PMID:23304547
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3529485/
Abstract

The decision whether to receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a decision in which the personal values of the patient must be considered along with information about the risks and benefits of the treatment. A decision aid can be used to provide patient decision support to a patient who is seriously ill and needs to consider CPR options. The goal of this project was to identify the barriers and facilitators to using a CPR decision aid, through evaluating nursing perceptions on providing patient decision support. Using a needs assessment, it was determined that implementing a patient decision aid for CPR status in the Acute Monitor Area (AMA) of The Ottawa Hospital would be an excellent quality improvement project. The nurses who chose to participate were given an education session regarding patient decision support. Questionnaires were distributed to evaluate their views of patient decision support and decision aids before and after the education session and implementation of the CPR decision aid. Questionnaire results did not indicate a significant change between before or after education session and decision aid implementation. Qualitative reports did indicate that nurses generally have positive attitudes toward patient decision support and decision aids. The nurses identified specific barriers and facilitators in their commentaries. This clinically relevant data supports the idea that patient decision support should be integrated into daily nursing practice.

摘要

是否接受心肺复苏(CPR)的决定是一个必须结合患者个人价值观以及治疗风险和益处信息来考虑的决定。决策辅助工具可用于为重症且需要考虑心肺复苏选项的患者提供患者决策支持。本项目的目标是通过评估护士对提供患者决策支持的看法,确定使用心肺复苏决策辅助工具的障碍和促进因素。通过需求评估,确定在渥太华医院急性监测区(AMA)实施关于心肺复苏状态的患者决策辅助工具将是一个优秀的质量改进项目。选择参与的护士接受了关于患者决策支持的教育课程。在教育课程以及心肺复苏决策辅助工具实施前后,分发问卷以评估他们对患者决策支持和决策辅助工具的看法。问卷结果并未表明教育课程前后以及决策辅助工具实施前后有显著变化。定性报告确实表明护士对患者决策支持和决策辅助工具总体持积极态度。护士们在评论中指出了具体的障碍和促进因素。这些具有临床相关性的数据支持了应将患者决策支持纳入日常护理实践的观点。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of nurses' perceptions on providing patient decision support with cardiopulmonary resuscitation.护士对提供心肺复苏患者决策支持的认知评估。
ISRN Nurs. 2012;2012:591541. doi: 10.5402/2012/591541. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
2
Development of a Decision Aid for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Involving Intensive Care Unit Patients' and Health Professionals' Participation Using User-Centered Design and a Wiki Platform for Rapid Prototyping: A Research Protocol.一项使用以用户为中心的设计和维基平台进行快速原型制作的、涉及重症监护病房患者及医护人员参与的心肺复苏决策辅助工具的开发:一项研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Feb 11;5(1):e24. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5107.
3
[Investigation on nurses' knowledge of and experience in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and on nurses' knowledge of the guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care established in 2000--results of a survey at Asahikawa Medical College Hospital (second report)].[关于护士对心肺复苏的知识与经验以及对2000年制定的心肺复苏和心血管急救指南的了解情况的调查——旭川医科大学附属医院的调查结果(第二篇报告)]
Masui. 2003 Apr;52(4):427-30.
4
Preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation.心肺复苏的偏好。
Image J Nurs Sch. 1997;29(3):229-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1997.tb00987.x.
5
Nurses' attitudes towards resuscitation and national resuscitation guidelines--nurses hesitate to start CPR-D.护士对复苏的态度和国家复苏指南——护士犹豫是否开始心肺复苏术 D。
Resuscitation. 2009 Dec;80(12):1399-404. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.08.025. Epub 2009 Oct 8.
6
Choices of seriously ill patients about cardiopulmonary resuscitation: correlates and outcomes. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.重症患者对心肺复苏的选择:相关因素及结果。支持研究组。了解治疗预后及风险的预后和偏好研究。
Am J Med. 1996 Feb;100(2):128-37. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(97)89450-8.
7
Barriers and facilitators influencing call center nurses' decision support for callers facing values-sensitive decisions: a mixed methods study.影响呼叫中心护士为面临价值观敏感决策的来电者提供决策支持的障碍与促进因素:一项混合方法研究
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2005;2(4):184-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2005.00035.x.
8
Nurses' perception and self-confidence of family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯护士对心肺复苏期间家属在场的认知与自信
J Educ Health Promot. 2023 Sep 29;12:320. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1845_22. eCollection 2023.
9
The effects of computerised decision support systems on nursing and allied health professional performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review and user contextualisation.计算机化决策支持系统对护理及相关健康专业人员绩效和患者结局的影响:一项系统综述与用户情境化分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Oct;12(40):1-93. doi: 10.3310/GRNM5147.
10
Absence of Relatives Impairs the Approach of Nurses to Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Non-Cancer Elderly Patients without a Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation Order: A Vignette-Based Questionnaire Study.亲属不在场会影响护士对非癌症老年患者进行心肺复苏的态度,这些患者没有下达拒绝复苏医嘱:基于情景的问卷调查研究。
Tohoku J Exp Med. 2020 Jan;250(1):71-78. doi: 10.1620/tjem.250.71.

引用本文的文献

1
Ottawa Decision Support Framework to Improve Iranian Nurses' Decision Coaching Skills.渥太华决策支持框架以提高伊朗护士的决策指导技能
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2022 Feb;26(2):199-203. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24106.
2
Barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in hospitals from policy to practice: a systematic review.医院中从政策到实践的共享决策的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2021 Jul 31;16(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01142-y.
3
Nursing knowledge of and attitude in cardiopulmonary arrest: cross-sectional survey analysis.心肺骤停的护理知识与态度:横断面调查分析
PeerJ. 2019 Feb 7;7:e6410. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6410. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient and healthcare professional factors influencing end-of-life decision-making during critical illness: a systematic review.影响危重病患者生命终末期决策的患者和医疗保健专业人员因素:系统评价。
Crit Care Med. 2011 May;39(5):1174-89. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31820eacf2.
2
Defining priorities for improving end-of-life care in Canada.定义加拿大改善临终关怀的优先事项。
CMAJ. 2010 Nov 9;182(16):E747-52. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.100131. Epub 2010 Oct 4.
3
Skills training to support patients considering place of end-of-life care: a randomized control trial.支持患者考虑临终关怀地点的技能培训:一项随机对照试验。
J Palliat Care. 2010 Summer;26(2):112-21.
4
Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.提高医疗保健专业人员采用共同决策的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12(5):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub2.
5
Development and use of a decision aid for communication with hospitalized patients about cardiopulmonary resuscitation preference.制定并使用一种决策辅助工具,以与住院患者就心肺复苏偏好进行沟通。
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Apr;79(1):130-3. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.08.002. Epub 2009 Sep 18.
6
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人群提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8(3):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub2.
7
Nurses' perceptions of factors influencing patient decision support for place of care at the end of life.护士对影响临终关怀地点患者决策支持因素的看法。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2009 Aug-Sep;26(4):254-63. doi: 10.1177/1049909108331316. Epub 2009 Feb 12.
8
Efficacy of a training intervention on the quality of practitioners' decision support for patients deciding about place of care at the end of life: A randomized control trial: Study protocol.一项关于培训干预对从业者为临终患者提供护理地点决策支持质量的效果:一项随机对照试验:研究方案
BMC Palliat Care. 2008 Apr 30;7:4. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-7-4.
9
Decision coaching to support shared decision making: a framework, evidence, and implications for nursing practice, education, and policy.支持共同决策的决策指导:一个框架、证据以及对护理实践、教育和政策的启示
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2008;5(1):25-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2007.00108.x. Epub 2008 Feb 6.
10
Do patient decision aids meet effectiveness criteria of the international patient decision aid standards collaboration? A systematic review and meta-analysis.患者决策辅助工具是否符合国际患者决策辅助工具标准协作组织的有效性标准?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Med Decis Making. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5):554-74. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07307319. Epub 2007 Sep 14.