Arts for Health and Well-Being Research Group, Research Institute for Health and Social Change, Manchester Metropolitan University, M13 0JA, UK.
Perspect Public Health. 2013 Jan;133(1):60-5. doi: 10.1177/1757913912466948.
This article considers eudaimonic models of psychological well-being in relation to qualitative data previously gathered as part of Manchester Metropolitan University's Invest to Save Arts in Health programme (2004-07).
The research draws from 21 interviews with participants involved in Invest to Save arts projects for older people and adults with a mental health diagnosis. Using a collaborative team approach, a hybrid thematic analysis was undertaken alongside an updated literature review framed by positive psychology and with a focus on well-being.
The analysis identified eudaimonic themes of autonomy/intrinsic motivation and challenge to be particularly pertinent to participants' experiences of the scheme. Findings suggest that the programme provided a sense of purposeful occupation, cognitive and creative challenge and opportunities for autonomous self-expression and heightened concentration (flow). Many participants identified with the arts activities on offer and, while not necessarily aspiring to achieve any particular status, were intrinsically motivated to develop what they considered to be their innate creative potential. Some also reported that sustained engagement was important to their continued psychological well-being.
Arts and health researchers might usefully draw from theories of well-being from positive psychology. Both fields are compatible in that they share an interest in human flourishing and understanding of wellness as more than an absence of dysfunction or disease. Further research is needed to ascertain whether the limited results presented here are representative of other populations. What does seem evident is that arts projects have a broad appeal and can be highly inclusive, accommodating participants with diverse needs. More generally the investigation raises questions about the cultural scaffolds that are in place to support eudaimonic well-being across the lifespan, as well as the consequences of restricting such opportunities for individuals and communities.
本文考虑了幸福论模型的心理幸福感,这与曼彻斯特城市大学投资拯救艺术健康计划(2004-07 年)中之前收集的定性数据有关。
这项研究从 21 名参与投资拯救老年人和有心理健康诊断的成年人的艺术项目的参与者的访谈中提取数据。使用协作团队方法,进行了混合主题分析,并结合积极心理学进行了更新的文献综述,重点关注幸福感。
分析确定自主/内在动机和挑战的幸福论主题与参与者对该计划的经验特别相关。研究结果表明,该计划提供了有目的的职业、认知和创造性挑战以及自主自我表达和提高注意力(流)的机会。许多参与者认同提供的艺术活动,虽然不一定渴望获得任何特定的地位,但内在地有动力发展他们认为是内在的创造潜力。一些人还报告说,持续参与对他们的持续心理健康很重要。
艺术和健康研究人员可能会从积极心理学的幸福感理论中受益。这两个领域是兼容的,因为它们都对人类繁荣和对健康的理解感兴趣,认为健康不仅仅是没有功能障碍或疾病。需要进一步研究以确定这里提出的有限结果是否代表其他人群。似乎明显的是,艺术项目具有广泛的吸引力,可以高度包容,满足具有不同需求的参与者。更普遍地说,该调查提出了关于支持整个生命周期幸福论幸福感的文化结构的问题,以及限制个人和社区获得这些机会的后果。