• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2 至 4 岁行牙槽骨裂植骨同期鼻整形术后 3 年单侧唇腭裂儿童的面中部美学

Facial esthetics in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate 3 years after alveolar bonegrafting combined with rhinoplasty between 2 and 4 years of age.

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Orthod Craniofac Res. 2013 Feb;16(1):36-43. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12002. Epub 2012 Sep 17.

DOI:10.1111/ocr.12002
PMID:23311658
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate facial esthetics in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) after alveolar bone grafting combined with rhinoplasty between 2 and 4 years of age.

DESIGN

Retrospective case-control study.

SETTING

The Department of Pediatric Surgery, Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Poland.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Photographs of full faces and cropped images of five nasolabial components: nasal deviation, nasal form, nasal profile, vermillion border, and inferior view were assessed by 5 professional and 14 layraters in 29 children (23 boys and 6 girls; mean age = 5.3 years, SD 0.5; Early-grafted group) and 30 children (20 boys and 10 girls; mean age = 5.5 years, SD 1.0; Non-grafted group) with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate repaired with a one-stage closure. The groups differed regarding the timing of alveolar bone grafting: in the Early-grafted group, alveolar bone grafting in combination with rhinoplasty (ABG-R) was performed between 2 and 4 years of age (mean age = 2.3 years; SD 0.6); in the Non-grafted group, the alveolar defect was grafted after 9 years of age. No primary nose correction was carried out in any group. To rate esthetics, a modified five-grade esthetic index of Asher-McDade was used, where grade 1 means the most esthetic and grade 5 - the least esthetic outcome.

RESULTS

Esthetics of full faces and of all nasolabial elements in the Early-grafted group was significantly better than in Non-grafted group. The scores in the Early-grafted group ranged from 2.30 to 2.66 points, whereas in the Non-grafted group ranged from 2.66 to 3.17 points. All intergroup differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Three years post-operatively, early alveolar bone grafting combined with rhinoplasty is favorable for facial esthetics in children with UCLP, but a longer follow-up is needed to assess whether the improvement was permanent.

摘要

目的

评估 2 至 4 岁行牙槽骨植骨联合鼻整形术的单侧唇腭裂(UCLP)患者的面部美观度。

设计

回顾性病例对照研究。

地点

波兰华沙母婴研究所小儿外科。

材料和方法

由 5 名专业评估者和 14 名非专业评估者对 29 名儿童(23 名男孩和 6 名女孩;平均年龄=5.3 岁,标准差 0.5;早期植骨组)和 30 名儿童(20 名男孩和 10 名女孩;平均年龄=5.5 岁,标准差 1.0;未植骨组)的全脸照片和五个鼻唇组件的裁剪图像(鼻侧偏斜、鼻型、鼻侧轮廓、红唇缘和下视图)进行评估。两组的差异在于牙槽骨植骨的时间:在早期植骨组中,牙槽骨植骨联合鼻整形术(ABG-R)于 2 至 4 岁时进行(平均年龄=2.3 岁;标准差 0.6);在未植骨组中,牙槽骨缺损在 9 岁后进行植骨。两组均未行初次鼻矫正。为了评估美观度,采用了改良的 Asher-McDade 五级美学指数,其中 1 级表示最美观,5 级表示最不美观。

结果

早期植骨组的全脸和所有鼻唇组件的美观度明显优于未植骨组。早期植骨组的评分范围为 2.30 至 2.66 分,而未植骨组的评分范围为 2.66 至 3.17 分。所有组间差异均具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。

结论

术后 3 年,早期牙槽骨植骨联合鼻整形术有利于 UCLP 患儿的面部美观度,但需要更长时间的随访来评估改善是否持久。

相似文献

1
Facial esthetics in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate 3 years after alveolar bonegrafting combined with rhinoplasty between 2 and 4 years of age.2 至 4 岁行牙槽骨裂植骨同期鼻整形术后 3 年单侧唇腭裂儿童的面中部美学
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2013 Feb;16(1):36-43. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12002. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
2
Nasolabial esthetics in children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate after 1- versus 3-stage treatment protocols.1期与3期治疗方案后单侧完全性唇腭裂患儿的鼻唇美学
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Aug;67(8):1661-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.003.
3
Nasolabial appearance after two palatoplasty types in cleft lip and palate.腭裂患者两种腭成形术后的鼻唇外观。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2014 May;17(2):124-31. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12039. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
4
Nasolabial aesthetics correlates poorly with skeletal symmetry in unilateral cleft lip and palate.单侧唇裂腭裂患者的鼻唇美学与骨骼对称性相关性差。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013 Jan;66(1):e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2012.08.032. Epub 2012 Sep 15.
5
A comparison of the effects of the Latham-Millard procedure with those of a conservative treatment approach for dental occlusion and facial aesthetics in unilateral and bilateral complete cleft lip and palate: part I. Dental occlusion.莱瑟姆 - 米勒手术与保守治疗方法对单侧和双侧完全性唇腭裂患者牙合及面部美学影响的比较:第一部分。牙合
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Jan;113(1):1-18. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000096710.08123.93.
6
Effects of nasoalveolar molding on nasolabial aesthetics in patients with cleft lip and palate during pre-adolescence: A systematic review and meta-analysis of retrospective studies.鼻腔-牙槽塑形对青春期前唇腭裂患者鼻唇美学的影响:回顾性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2024 Jun;27(3):350-363. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12762. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
7
Rating Nasolabial Aesthetics in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: Cropped Versus Full-Face Images.评估单侧唇腭裂患者的鼻唇美学:裁剪图像与全脸图像对比
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018 May;55(5):747-752. doi: 10.1177/1055665617747702. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
8
3D Assessment of Nasolabial Appearance in Patients With Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.单侧完全性唇腭裂患者鼻唇外观的三维评估
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018 Feb;55(2):220-225. doi: 10.1177/1055665617726532. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
9
Comparison of Three Methods of Rating Nasolabial Appearance in Cleft Lip and Palate.唇腭裂患者鼻唇外观三种评分方法的比较
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017 Jul;54(4):400-407. doi: 10.1597/14-189. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
10
The Americleft Project: A Modification of Asher-McDade Method for Rating Nasolabial Esthetics in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Using Q-sort.美国腭裂项目:一种对阿舍-麦克戴德法的改良,用于通过Q分类法评估单侧唇腭裂患者的鼻唇美学。
J Craniofac Surg. 2017 Nov;28(8):1911-1917. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003787.

引用本文的文献

1
The Slavcleft: a three-center study of the outcome of treatment of cleft lip and palate. Nasolabial appearance.斯拉维克腭裂:一项关于唇腭裂治疗结果的三中心研究。鼻唇外观。
PeerJ. 2021 Feb 9;9:e10631. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10631. eCollection 2021.
2
Comparison of professional and laypeople evaluation of nasolabial esthetics following unilateral cleft lip repair.单侧唇裂修复术后鼻唇美学的专业与非专业评估比较
Eur J Dent. 2018 Oct-Dec;12(4):516-522. doi: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_31_18.
3
Nasal appearance after secondary cleft rhinoplasty: comparison of professional rating with patient satisfaction.
二期腭裂鼻整形术后的鼻部外观:专业评级与患者满意度的比较
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Jun;20(2):195-201. doi: 10.1007/s10006-016-0555-4. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
4
Clinicians and laypeople assessment of facial attractiveness in patients with cleft lip and palate treated with LeFort I surgery or late maxillary protraction.临床医生和外行人对接受勒福Ⅰ型手术或晚期上颌前牵引治疗的唇腭裂患者面部吸引力的评估。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Sep;77(9):1446-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.05.042. Epub 2013 Jul 18.