Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Clin Radiol. 2013 Apr;68(4):e191-7. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2012.11.006. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
To identify retrospectively potential associations between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and tumour grade as well as other pathological features, using histopathological assessment from the Whipple procedure as the reference standard.
Thirty patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including diffusion-weighted imaging with b-values of 0 and 500 s/mm(2) before the Whipple procedure. Two radiologists independently recorded the ADC values of the tumour and benign pancreas for all cases. ADC values were compared with histopathological findings following the Whipple procedure.
The intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.689 for benign pancreas and 0.695 for tumours, indicating good inter-reader agreement for ADC values. The mean ADC value was significantly lower in tumours than in benign pancreas for both readers (reader 1: 1.74 ± 0.34 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s versus 2.08 ± 0.48 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s, respectively, p = 0.006; reader 2: 1.69 ± 0.41 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s versus 2.11 ± 0.54 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s, respectively, p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in mean ADC between poorly and well/moderately differentiated tumours for either reader (reader 1: 1.69 ± 0.36 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s versus 1.78 ± 0.33 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s, respectively, p = 0.491; reader 2: 1.62 ± 0.33 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s versus 1.75 ± 0.49 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s, respectively, p = 0.405). The area under the curve (AUC) for differentiation of poorly and well/moderately differentiated tumours was 0.611 and 0.596 for readers 1 and 2, respectively, and was not significantly better than an AUC of 0.500 for either reader (p ≥ 0.306). In addition, ADC was not significantly different for either reader between tumours with stage T3 versus stage T1/T2, between tumours with and without metastatic peri-pancreatic lymph nodes, or between tumours located in the pancreatic head versus other pancreatic regions (p ≥ 0.413).
No associations between ADC values of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and tumour grade or other adverse pathological features were observed.
通过以胰十二指肠切除术的组织病理学评估作为参考标准,回顾性地确定胰腺腺癌表观扩散系数(ADC)值与肿瘤分级以及其他病理特征之间的潜在关联。
30 名胰腺腺癌患者在胰十二指肠切除术前行磁共振成像(MRI)检查,包括 b 值为 0 和 500 s/mm²的弥散加权成像。两位放射科医生独立记录了所有病例的肿瘤和良性胰腺的 ADC 值。ADC 值与胰十二指肠切除术后的组织病理学发现进行了比较。
良性胰腺的组内相关系数为 0.689,肿瘤为 0.695,表明两位观察者的 ADC 值具有良好的一致性。两位观察者均发现肿瘤的平均 ADC 值明显低于良性胰腺(观察者 1:1.74±0.34×10(-3)mm²/s 与 2.08±0.48×10(-3)mm²/s,p=0.006;观察者 2:1.69±0.41×10(-3)mm²/s 与 2.11±0.54×10(-3)mm²/s,p<0.001)。然而,对于任何一位观察者,低分化和高/中分化肿瘤的平均 ADC 值之间均无显著差异(观察者 1:1.69±0.36×10(-3)mm²/s 与 1.78±0.33×10(-3)mm²/s,p=0.491;观察者 2:1.62±0.33×10(-3)mm²/s 与 1.75±0.49×10(-3)mm²/s,p=0.405)。观察者 1 和 2 区分低分化和高/中分化肿瘤的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为 0.611 和 0.596,均不比 AUC 值为 0.500 的观察者 1 和 2 的 AUC 值(p≥0.306)更好。此外,ADC 值在任何一位观察者中,在 T3 期肿瘤与 T1/T2 期肿瘤之间、有和无胰周转移性淋巴结的肿瘤之间,以及在胰头肿瘤与其他胰腺区域肿瘤之间均无显著差异(p≥0.413)。
未观察到胰腺腺癌 ADC 值与肿瘤分级或其他不良病理特征之间存在关联。