• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

奶制品废水处理与藻类生物能源生产一体化系统的环境与经济评估

Environmental and economic assessment of integrated systems for dairy manure treatment coupled with algae bioenergy production.

机构信息

Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Virginia, P.O. Box 400742, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4742, USA.

出版信息

Bioresour Technol. 2013 Feb;130:486-94. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.11.123. Epub 2012 Dec 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.11.123
PMID:23313697
Abstract

Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC) are used to investigate integrated algae bioenergy production and nutrient management on small dairy farms. Four cases are considered: a reference land-application scenario (REF), anaerobic digestion with land-application of liquid digestate (AD), and anaerobic digestion with recycling of liquid digestate to either an open-pond algae cultivation system (OPS) or an algae turf scrubber (ATS). LCA indicates that all three "improved" scenarios (AD, OPS, and ATS) are environmentally favorable compared to REF, exhibiting increases in net energy output up to 854GJ/yr, reductions in net eutrophication potential up to 2700kg PO(4)-eq/yr, and reductions in global warming potential up to 196Mg CO(2)-eq/yr. LCC reveals that the integrated algae systems are much more financially attractive than either AD or REF, whereby net present values (NPV) are as follows: $853,250 for OPS, $790,280 for ATS, -$62,279 for REF, and -$211,126 for AD. However, these results are highly dependent on the sale price for nutrient credits. Comparison of LCA and LCC results indicates that robust nutrient credit markets or other policy tools are required to align financial and environmental preferability of energy production systems and foster widespread adoption of sustainable nutrient management systems.

摘要

生命周期评估 (LCA) 和生命周期成本核算 (LCC) 用于研究小型奶牛养殖场综合藻类生物能源生产和养分管理。考虑了四种情况:参考土地应用情景 (REF)、液体消化物土地应用的厌氧消化 (AD) 以及液体消化物回收至开放式池塘藻类培养系统 (OPS) 或藻类草皮洗涤器 (ATS) 的厌氧消化。LCA 表明,与 REF 相比,所有三种“改进”情景 (AD、OPS 和 ATS) 在环境方面都更有利,净能源输出增加了 854GJ/yr,净富营养化潜力减少了 2700kg PO(4)-eq/yr,全球变暖潜势减少了 196Mg CO(2)-eq/yr。LCC 表明,藻类综合系统比 AD 或 REF 更具经济吸引力,其净现值 (NPV) 如下:OPS 为 853,250 美元,ATS 为 790,280 美元,REF 为 -62,279 美元,AD 为 -211,126 美元。然而,这些结果高度依赖于养分信贷的销售价格。LCA 和 LCC 结果的比较表明,需要健全的养分信贷市场或其他政策工具来调整能源生产系统的财务和环境偏好,并促进可持续养分管理系统的广泛采用。

相似文献

1
Environmental and economic assessment of integrated systems for dairy manure treatment coupled with algae bioenergy production.奶制品废水处理与藻类生物能源生产一体化系统的环境与经济评估
Bioresour Technol. 2013 Feb;130:486-94. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.11.123. Epub 2012 Dec 7.
2
Mitigating the environmental impacts of milk production via anaerobic digestion of manure: case study of a dairy farm in the Po Valley.通过粪污厌氧消化缓解牛奶生产的环境影响:以波河谷的一个奶牛场为例。
Sci Total Environ. 2014 May 15;481:196-208. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.02.038. Epub 2014 Mar 2.
3
Environmental consequences of processing manure to produce mineral fertilizer and bio-energy.处理粪便以生产矿物肥料和生物能源的环境后果。
J Environ Manage. 2012 Jul 15;102:173-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.02.032. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
4
Environmental implications of anaerobic digestion for manure management in dairy farms in Mexico: a life cycle perspective.墨西哥奶牛场粪便管理厌氧消化的环境影响:生命周期视角
Environ Technol. 2015;36(17):2198-209. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2015.1024758. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
5
Profits from pollutants: Economic feasibility of integrated anaerobic digester and nutrient management systems.污染物带来的收益:综合厌氧消化池与养分管理系统的经济可行性
J Environ Manage. 2016 Dec 15;184(Pt 2):353-362. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.10.012. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
6
Assessing the environmental impact of resource recovery from dairy manure.评估从奶牛粪便中回收资源对环境的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Mar 15;330:117150. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117150. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
7
Green cheese: partial life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions and energy intensity of integrated dairy production and bioenergy systems.绿色奶酪:综合乳制品生产和生物能源系统温室气体排放及能源强度的部分生命周期评估
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Mar;98(3):1571-92. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8850. Epub 2015 Jan 15.
8
Life cycle assessment of manure management and nutrient recycling from a Chinese pig farm.中国养猪场粪污管理及养分循环的生命周期评价。
Waste Manag Res. 2014 Jan;32(1):4-12. doi: 10.1177/0734242X13512715. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
9
Reducing the environmental impact of methane emissions from dairy farms by anaerobic digestion of cattle waste.通过对牛的废物进行厌氧消化来减少奶牛场甲烷排放对环境的影响。
Waste Manag. 2011 Aug;31(8):1745-51. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.03.015. Epub 2011 Apr 19.
10
Anaerobic digestion and milking frequency as mitigation strategies of the environmental burden in the milk production system.厌氧消化和挤奶频率作为减轻牛奶生产系统环境负担的策略。
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Jan 1;539:450-459. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.015. Epub 2015 Sep 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Sustainability and circularity assessment of biomass-based energy supply chain.基于生物质的能源供应链的可持续性与循环性评估
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 27;10(19):e38557. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38557. eCollection 2024 Oct 15.
2
A Critical Review of Data Science Applications in Resource Recovery and Carbon Capture from Organic Waste.关于有机废物资源回收与碳捕获中数据科学应用的批判性综述
ACS ES T Eng. 2023 Sep 29;3(10):1424-1467. doi: 10.1021/acsestengg.3c00043. eCollection 2023 Oct 13.
3
Adaptation of Livestock to New Diets Using Feed Components without Competition with Human Edible Protein Sources-A Review of the Possibilities and Recommendations.
利用饲料成分使家畜适应新日粮而不与人类可食用蛋白质来源竞争——可能性与建议综述
Animals (Basel). 2021 Aug 3;11(8):2293. doi: 10.3390/ani11082293.