Biomedical Engineering, Boston University Boston, MA, USA.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jan 4;6:340. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00340. eCollection 2012.
A RECENT OPINION ARTICLE (NEURAL OSCILLATIONS IN SPEECH: do not be enslaved by the envelope. Obleser et al., 2012) questions the validity of a class of speech perception models inspired by the possible role of neuronal oscillations in decoding speech (e.g., Ghitza, 2011; Giraud and Poeppel, 2012). The authors criticize, in particular, what they see as an over-emphasis of the role of temporal speech envelope information, and an over-emphasis of entrainment to the input rhythm while neglecting the role of top-down processes in modulating the entrainment of neuronal oscillations. Here we respond to these arguments, referring to the phenomenological model of Ghitza (2011), taken as a representative of the criticized approach.
最近的一篇观点文章（神经振荡在言语中的作用：不要被包络线束缚。Obleser 等人，2012）质疑了一类受神经元振荡在言语解码中可能作用启发的言语感知模型的有效性（例如，Ghitza，2011；Giraud 和 Poeppel，2012）。作者特别批评了他们认为的过度强调时间言语包络信息的作用，以及过度强调与输入节奏的同步，而忽视了自上而下的过程在调节神经元振荡的同步中的作用。在这里，我们将参考 Ghitza（2011）的现象学模型来回应这些观点，该模型被视为所批评方法的代表。
