• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在姑息治疗中进行生活质量评估是否看起来像是一个复杂的筛查程序?

Does quality of life assessment in palliative care look like a complex screening program?

机构信息

IRCCS AOU San Martino - IST Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa, Italy.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Jan 14;11:7. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-7.

DOI:10.1186/1477-7525-11-7
PMID:23317347
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3584731/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Palliative Care (PC) is an approach that improves the Quality of Life (QoL). A number of QoL assessment tools have been developed and validated in PC. It is not clear how QoL should be measured in PC practice. A procedure of QoL assessment in clinical practice can be defined as a clinical intervention focused on QoL assessment. This is a typical complex intervention that should be appropriately developed and described in all its components and assessed for its effectiveness. The aim of this study is to define a framework to help researchers to develop and evaluate clinical interventions focused on QoL assessment in PC.

METHODS

A study group of experts in PC and in research methodology was set up to define a framework that would describe the principles of clinical interventions focused on QoL assessment in PC. The study group discussed the WHO Population Screening Principles as a possible useful framework. The new principles had to be developed taking into account the following criteria: 1) specific to PC practice; 2) address a single underlying characteristic; 3) anchored to relevant literature; 4) consistent with the WHO PC definition.With regard to contents and the format of the principles, discussions occurred among the study group members through a cognitive process.

RESULTS

We reviewed each of the WHO Population Screening Principles and adapted them to QoL assessment, taking into account the defined criteria. As a result, a new framework, the QoL Assessment Principles in Palliative Care was developed. It consisted of 4 sections, for a total of 11 principles.

CONCLUSIONS

The WHO Screening Principles framework was used to outline the eleven essential principles to be considered in developing and/or evaluating clinical interventions focused on QoL assessment in PC. The QoL Assessment Principles in Palliative Care identified could represent a methodological and ethical standard to be considered when developing and evaluating a clinical intervention focused on QoL assessment in PC.

摘要

背景

姑息治疗(PC)是一种提高生活质量(QoL)的方法。已经开发并验证了许多用于姑息治疗的 QoL 评估工具。目前尚不清楚在姑息治疗实践中应该如何衡量 QoL。临床实践中的 QoL 评估程序可以定义为专注于 QoL 评估的临床干预。这是一种典型的复杂干预,应该在所有组成部分中进行适当的开发和描述,并评估其效果。本研究的目的是定义一个框架,帮助研究人员开发和评估专注于姑息治疗中 QoL 评估的临床干预措施。

方法

成立了一个姑息治疗和研究方法学专家小组,以定义一个框架,该框架将描述专注于姑息治疗中 QoL 评估的临床干预措施的原则。研究小组讨论了世界卫生组织人口筛查原则作为一种可能有用的框架。新原则必须在考虑以下标准的情况下制定:1)特定于姑息治疗实践;2)针对单个潜在特征;3)以相关文献为依据;4)与世界卫生组织姑息治疗定义一致。关于原则的内容和格式,研究小组成员通过认知过程进行了讨论。

结果

我们审查了世界卫生组织人口筛查原则中的每一条,并根据定义的标准对其进行了调整,以适应 QoL 评估。结果,制定了一个新的框架,即姑息治疗中的 QoL 评估原则。它由 4 个部分组成,共 11 条原则。

结论

使用世界卫生组织筛查原则框架概述了在开发和/或评估专注于姑息治疗中 QoL 评估的临床干预措施时应考虑的 11 条基本原则。姑息治疗中的 QoL 评估原则可以作为一种方法学和伦理标准,在开发和评估专注于姑息治疗中 QoL 评估的临床干预措施时加以考虑。

相似文献

1
Does quality of life assessment in palliative care look like a complex screening program?在姑息治疗中进行生活质量评估是否看起来像是一个复杂的筛查程序?
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Jan 14;11:7. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-7.
2
A phase 2 quasi-experimental trial evaluating the feasibility, acceptability, and potential effectiveness of complex nursing intervention focused on QoL assessment on advanced cancer patients with palliative care needs: study protocol.一项2期准实验性试验,评估针对有姑息治疗需求的晚期癌症患者,聚焦生活质量评估的综合护理干预措施的可行性、可接受性及潜在效果:研究方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2017 Nov 13;3:54. doi: 10.1186/s40814-017-0196-x. eCollection 2017.
3
Use of Theoretical Frameworks in the Development and Testing of Palliative Care Interventions.理论框架在姑息治疗干预措施的制定和测试中的应用。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Mar;63(3):e271-e280. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.10.011. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
4
Spiritual Pain Is Associated with Decreased Quality of Life in Advanced Cancer Patients in Palliative Care: An Exploratory Study.灵性疼痛与晚期癌症患者在姑息治疗中的生活质量下降相关:一项探索性研究。
J Palliat Med. 2019 Jun;22(6):663-669. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0340. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
5
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
6
Introducing Palliative Care within the Treatment of End-Stage Liver Disease: The Study Protocol of a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.在终末期肝病治疗中引入姑息治疗:一项集群随机对照试验的研究方案。
J Palliat Med. 2019 Sep;22(S1):34-43. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0121.
7
Characteristics of Participants Enrolled onto a Randomized Controlled Trial of Palliative Care for Patients on Phase I Studies.纳入针对处于I期研究阶段患者的姑息治疗随机对照试验的参与者特征。
J Palliat Med. 2017 Dec;20(12):1338-1344. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0158. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
8
Content and spiritual items of quality-of-life instruments appropriate for use in palliative care: a review.适用于姑息治疗的生活质量工具的内容和精神项目:综述。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 Aug;40(2):290-300. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.12.012. Epub 2010 Jun 11.
9
Developing palliative care programs in Indigenous communities using participatory action research: a Canadian application of the public health approach to palliative care.运用参与式行动研究在原住民社区开展姑息治疗项目:加拿大公共卫生姑息治疗方法的应用
Ann Palliat Med. 2018 Apr;7(Suppl 2):S52-S72. doi: 10.21037/apm.2018.03.06.
10
Effects of a Self-Monitoring Quality of Life Intervention for Patients with Cancer Receiving Palliative Care in Japan: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.日本针对接受姑息治疗的癌症患者的自我监测生活质量干预措施的效果:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018 Nov 28;19(11):3027-3032. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2018.19.11.3027.

引用本文的文献

1
Compassionate Engagement and Action in the Education for Health Care Professions: A Cross-Sectional Study at an Ecuadorian University.关爱与行动:厄瓜多尔大学医疗保健专业教育的跨学科研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 28;17(15):5425. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155425.
2
A phase 2 quasi-experimental trial evaluating the feasibility, acceptability, and potential effectiveness of complex nursing intervention focused on QoL assessment on advanced cancer patients with palliative care needs: study protocol.一项2期准实验性试验,评估针对有姑息治疗需求的晚期癌症患者,聚焦生活质量评估的综合护理干预措施的可行性、可接受性及潜在效果:研究方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2017 Nov 13;3:54. doi: 10.1186/s40814-017-0196-x. eCollection 2017.
3
Quality of life in end stage renal disease patients.终末期肾病患者的生活质量
World J Nephrol. 2014 Nov 6;3(4):308-16. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v3.i4.308.

本文引用的文献

1
Integrating spiritual care within palliative care: an overview of nine demonstration projects.将精神关怀融入姑息治疗:九个示范项目概述
J Palliat Med. 2012 Feb;15(2):154-62. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2011.0211. Epub 2012 Feb 3.
2
Clinical outcomes and health-related quality of life after thoracoscopic talc pleurodesis.胸腔镜滑石粉胸膜固定术后的临床结果和健康相关生活质量。
J Palliat Med. 2012 Jan;15(1):37-42. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2011.0149. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
3
Palliative care for the terminally ill in America: the consideration of QALYs, costs, and ethical issues.美国晚期患者的姑息治疗:对质量调整生命年、成本及伦理问题的考量
Med Health Care Philos. 2012 Nov;15(4):411-6. doi: 10.1007/s11019-011-9364-6.
4
Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations.在临床实践中实施患者报告结局评估:选项和考虑因素的综述。
Qual Life Res. 2012 Oct;21(8):1305-14. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-0054-x. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
5
Spiritual needs assessments and measurements.精神需求评估和测量。
Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2011 Sep;5(3):273-8. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0b013e3283499b20.
6
Implementing patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in palliative care--users' cry for help.在姑息治疗中实施患者报告结局测量(PROMs)——使用者的求助呼声。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011 Apr 20;9:27. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-27.
7
Assessment of quality of life in patients receiving palliative care: comparison of measurement tools and single item on subjective well-being.评估接受姑息治疗患者的生活质量:测量工具和主观幸福感单项的比较。
J Palliat Med. 2011 May;14(5):599-606. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2010.0473. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
8
Effectiveness of a clinical intervention to eliminate barriers to pain and fatigue management in oncology.临床干预消除肿瘤患者疼痛和疲劳管理障碍的效果。
J Palliat Med. 2011 Feb;14(2):197-205. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2010.0268. Epub 2011 Jan 27.
9
Can a good death and quality of life be achieved for patients with terminal cancer in a palliative care unit?在姑息治疗病房中,终末期癌症患者能否实现善终和提高生活质量?
J Palliat Med. 2010 Dec;13(12):1433-8. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2010.0240. Epub 2010 Dec 2.
10
Improving hospice outcomes through systematic assessment: a clinical trial.通过系统评估改善临终关怀结局:一项临床试验。
Cancer Nurs. 2011 Mar-Apr;34(2):89-97. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181f70aee.