• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

斯洛伐克语儿童与 SLI 儿童的非词重复表现:新的评分方法。

Non-word repetition performance in Slovak-speaking children with and without SLI: novel scoring methods.

机构信息

Faculty of Education, Institute of Psychology and Speech Therapy Studies, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia.

出版信息

Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2013 Jan;48(1):78-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-6984.2012.00189.x. Epub 2012 Nov 2.

DOI:10.1111/j.1460-6984.2012.00189.x
PMID:23317386
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Non-word repetition (NWR) tasks have been found to correlate with language skills and to discriminate between groups of typically developing (TD) children and children with specific language impairment (SLI) across languages.

AIMS

The main aim was to develop an easily-administered NWR screening test that could discriminate between Slovak-speaking TD children and children with SLI. The second aim was to establish if the novel scoring methods for NWR tasks were equally effective at differentiating between the TD versus SLI groups. As Slovak vowels are not reduced in unstressed syllables, it was also sought to establish whether scoring vowels (in addition to the consonants usually assessed in English language tests) would be informative.

METHODS & PROCEDURES: The paper evaluated the performance of a new NWR task for Slovak-speaking children. Study 1 compared the performance of 60 TD children in three age groups: 3-year-olds (N = 20), 4-your-olds (N = 20) and 5-year-olds (N = 20). Five types of scoring methods were examined: whole-item, number of syllables, syllable structure, consonants, and vowels. Study 2 compared performance on the NWR task administered in Study 1 across three groups of child participants: an SLI group (N = 16), a TD age-matched group (N = 16), and a TD language-matched group (N = 14).

OUTCOMES & RESULTS: Study 1 found an age effect in the TD sample for three out of five of the scoring methods tested (number of syllables, syllable structure, and consonants). Study 2 showed that all five of the scoring methods discriminated between: (1) the group of children with SLI and the TD language-matched (TDLM) sample and (2) the group of children with SLI and the TD age-matched (TDAM) group.

CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: The novel NWR tool reliably differentiated between children with SLI and TD children. Scoring cut-off points which demonstrated high rates of success at verifying true-positives (93.75%) and true-negatives (100%) are provided. The most informative scoring methods for Slavic languages (whole-item scoring and vowels correct) are identified and discussed.

摘要

背景

非词重复(NWR)任务已被发现与语言技能相关,并能在不同语言的典型发育儿童(TD)和特定语言障碍(SLI)儿童之间进行区分。

目的

主要目的是开发一种易于管理的 NWR 筛查测试,以区分斯洛伐克语的 TD 儿童和 SLI 儿童。第二个目的是确定用于区分 TD 与 SLI 组的新的 NWR 任务评分方法是否同样有效。由于斯洛伐克语中的元音在非重读音节中不弱化,因此还试图确定在辅音(通常在英语语言测试中评估)之外评估元音是否会提供信息。

方法和程序

本文评估了一种新的 NWR 任务在斯洛伐克语儿童中的表现。研究 1 比较了三个年龄组的 60 名 TD 儿童的表现:3 岁儿童(N=20)、4 岁儿童(N=20)和 5 岁儿童(N=20)。研究了五种评分方法:整体项目、音节数、音节结构、辅音和元音。研究 2 比较了在研究 1 中对 NWR 任务的表现,涉及三组儿童参与者:SLI 组(N=16)、TD 年龄匹配组(N=16)和 TD 语言匹配组(N=14)。

结果

研究 1 发现 TD 样本中的年龄效应在五种评分方法中的三种中(音节数、音节结构和辅音)。研究 2 表明,五种评分方法均能区分:(1)SLI 组和 TD 语言匹配(TDLM)样本;(2)SLI 组和 TD 年龄匹配(TDAM)组。

结论和意义

新的 NWR 工具可靠地区分了 SLI 儿童和 TD 儿童。提供了高准确率(93.75%)和真阴性(100%)验证的得分切点。确定并讨论了适用于斯拉夫语言的最具信息量的评分方法(整体项目评分和元音正确)。

相似文献

1
Non-word repetition performance in Slovak-speaking children with and without SLI: novel scoring methods.斯洛伐克语儿童与 SLI 儿童的非词重复表现:新的评分方法。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2013 Jan;48(1):78-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-6984.2012.00189.x. Epub 2012 Nov 2.
2
Nonword repetition--a clinical marker for specific language impairment in Swedish associated with parents' language-related problems.非词重复——瑞典语中特定语言障碍的一个临床指标,与父母的语言相关问题有关。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 24;9(2):e89544. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089544. eCollection 2014.
3
Nonword repetition and sentence repetition as clinical markers of specific language impairment: the case of Cantonese.非词重复和句子重复作为特定语言障碍的临床指标:粤语的案例
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006 Apr;49(2):219-36. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2006/019).
4
Nonword repetition: the relative contributions of phonological short-term memory and phonological representations in children with language and reading impairment.非词复述:语言和阅读障碍儿童的语音短期记忆和语音表征的相对贡献。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012 Jun;55(3):683-94. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0263). Epub 2012 Jan 5.
5
Non-word repetition in adolescents with specific language impairment (SLI).特定语言障碍(SLI)青少年的非词重复。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2012 May-Jun;47(3):257-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00099.x. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
6
Non-word repetition in Dutch-speaking children with specific language impairment with and without reading problems.荷兰语语言障碍儿童的非词重复,包括有和无阅读问题的儿童。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2010 Mar;28(Pt 1):177-88. doi: 10.1348/026151009x482633.
7
Performance of children on the Turkish Nonword Repetition Test: Effect of word similarity, word length, and scoring.儿童在土耳其非词重复测试中的表现:单词相似性、单词长度和评分的影响。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2014 Jul-Aug;28(7-8):602-16. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2014.927003.
8
Identifying language impairment in bilingual children in France and in Germany.在法国和德国识别双语儿童的语言障碍。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2018 Jul;53(4):888-904. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12397. Epub 2018 May 23.
9
The relationship between phonological short-term memory, receptive vocabulary, and fast mapping in children with specific language impairment.特定语言障碍儿童的语音短期记忆、接受性词汇与快速映射之间的关系。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2016 Jan;51(1):61-73. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12185. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
10
Factors affecting judgment accuracy when scoring children's responses to non-word repetition stimuli in real time.实时评分儿童对非词重复刺激反应时影响判断准确性的因素。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Mar-Apr;59(2):678-697. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12954. Epub 2023 Oct 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations between early motor milestones and speech-language abilities in 4 to 6-year-old children with DLD.4至6岁发育性语言障碍儿童早期运动里程碑与言语语言能力之间的关联
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jul 11;104(28):e43297. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043297.
2
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Screening Tools for Language Disorder.语言障碍筛查工具的系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Pediatr. 2022 Feb 23;10:801220. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.801220. eCollection 2022.
3
Infant-directed input and literacy effects on phonological processing: Non-word repetition scores among the Tsimane'.
婴儿导向输入和读写能力对语音处理的影响:提斯曼人的非词重复分数。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 11;15(9):e0237702. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237702. eCollection 2020.
4
Diagnostic Accuracy of Sentence Repetition and Nonword Repetition for Developmental Language Disorder in Vietnamese.越南语中句子重复和非词重复对发育性语言障碍的诊断准确性
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 May 22;63(5):1521-1536. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00366. Epub 2020 May 13.
5
The role of working memory in children's ability for prosodic discrimination.工作记忆在儿童韵律辨别能力中的作用。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 9;15(3):e0229857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229857. eCollection 2020.
6
Including Nonlinguistic Processing Tasks in the Identification of Developmental Language Disorder.将非语言加工任务纳入发展性语言障碍的识别中。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Aug 9;28(3):932-944. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-IDLL-18-0208.
7
Behind the Scenes of Developmental Language Disorder: Time to Call Neuropsychology Back on Stage.发育性语言障碍的幕后故事:是时候让神经心理学重返舞台了。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Jan 9;12:517. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00517. eCollection 2018.
8
An Application of Network Science to Phonological Sequence Learning in Children With Developmental Language Disorder.网络科学在发育性语言障碍儿童语音序列学习中的应用
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Sep 19;61(9):2275-2291. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-18-0036.
9
Nonword repetition stimuli for Vietnamese-speaking children.越南语儿童的无词复述刺激物。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Aug;50(4):1311-1326. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1049-0.
10
A systematic review on diagnostic procedures for specific language impairment: The sensitivity and specificity issues.关于特定语言障碍诊断程序的系统评价:敏感性和特异性问题。
J Res Med Sci. 2016 Sep 1;21:67. doi: 10.4103/1735-1995.189648. eCollection 2016.