• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

斯里兰卡甘帕哈地区的登革热病媒控制中的社区动员和家庭层面的废物管理:一项干预研究。

Community mobilization and household level waste management for dengue vector control in Gampaha district of Sri Lanka; an intervention study.

机构信息

University of Kelaniya, Faculty of Medicine, Thalagolla Road, Ragama, Sri Lanka.

出版信息

Pathog Glob Health. 2012 Dec;106(8):479-87. doi: 10.1179/2047773212Y.0000000060.

DOI:10.1179/2047773212Y.0000000060
PMID:23318240
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3541909/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Waste management through community mobilization to reduce breeding places at household level could be an effective and sustainable dengue vector control strategy in areas where vector breeding takes place in small discarded water containers. The objective of this study was to assess the validity of this assumption.

METHODS

An intervention study was conducted from February 2009 to February 2010 in the populous Gampaha District of Sri Lanka. Eight neighborhoods (clusters) with roughly 200 houses each were selected randomly from high and low dengue endemic areas; 4 of them were allocated to the intervention arm (2 in the high and 2 in the low endemicity areas) and in the same way 4 clusters to the control arm. A baseline household survey was conducted and entomological and sociological surveys were carried out simultaneously at baseline, at 3 months, at 9 months and at 15 months after the start of the intervention. The intervention programme in the treatment clusters consisted of building partnerships of local stakeholders, waste management at household level, the promotion of composting biodegradable household waste, raising awareness on the importance of solid waste management in dengue control and improving garbage collection with the assistance of local government authorities.

RESULTS

The intervention and control clusters were very similar and there were no significant differences in pupal and larval indices of Aedes mosquitoes. The establishment of partnerships among local authorities was well accepted and sustainable; the involvement of communities and households was successful. Waste management with the elimination of the most productive water container types (bowls, tins, bottles) led to a significant reduction of pupal indices as a proxy for adult vector densities.

CONCLUSION

The coordination of local authorities along with increased household responsibility for targeted vector interventions (in our case solid waste management due to the type of preferred vector breeding places) is vital for effective and sustained dengue control.

摘要

简介

通过社区动员来管理废物,以减少家庭层面的滋生地,这可能是一种在蚊虫滋生于小型废弃水容器的地区有效且可持续的登革热病媒控制策略。本研究的目的是评估这一假设的有效性。

方法

本干预研究于 2009 年 2 月至 2010 年 2 月在斯里兰卡人口稠密的加勒地区进行。从高和低登革热流行地区随机选择 8 个街区(群集),每个街区约有 200 户;其中 4 个被分配到干预组(高流行区 2 个,低流行区 2 个),同样,4 个街区被分配到对照组。进行基线家庭调查,并在基线、3 个月、9 个月和干预开始后 15 个月同步进行昆虫学和社会学调查。治疗组的干预方案包括建立地方利益攸关方的伙伴关系、家庭层面的废物管理、促进可生物降解家庭废物的堆肥、提高对固体废物管理在登革热控制中的重要性的认识以及在地方政府当局的协助下改善垃圾收集。

结果

干预组和对照组非常相似,伊蚊蛹和幼虫指数没有显著差异。地方当局之间建立伙伴关系得到了很好的接受和可持续发展;社区和家庭的参与是成功的。通过废物管理消除最具生产力的水容器类型(碗、罐、瓶),导致作为成蚊密度替代指标的蛹指数显著减少。

结论

协调地方当局,同时增加家庭对有针对性的病媒干预措施的责任(在我们的案例中,由于首选病媒滋生地的类型,是固体废物管理),对于有效和持续的登革热控制至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f2a/4001524/6a755ef583b2/pgh-106-08-479-f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f2a/4001524/59e03c2e518c/pgh-106-08-479-f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f2a/4001524/6a755ef583b2/pgh-106-08-479-f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f2a/4001524/59e03c2e518c/pgh-106-08-479-f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f2a/4001524/6a755ef583b2/pgh-106-08-479-f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Community mobilization and household level waste management for dengue vector control in Gampaha district of Sri Lanka; an intervention study.斯里兰卡甘帕哈地区的登革热病媒控制中的社区动员和家庭层面的废物管理:一项干预研究。
Pathog Glob Health. 2012 Dec;106(8):479-87. doi: 10.1179/2047773212Y.0000000060.
2
Community-based control of Aedes aegypti by adoption of eco-health methods in Chennai City, India.印度钦奈市采用生态健康方法进行基于社区的埃及伊蚊控制。
Pathog Glob Health. 2012 Dec;106(8):488-96. doi: 10.1179/2047773212Y.0000000056.
3
Eco-bio-social research on dengue in Asia: a multicountry study on ecosystem and community-based approaches for the control of dengue vectors in urban and peri-urban Asia.亚洲登革热的生态-生物-社会研究:一项关于生态系统和基于社区的亚洲城市和城郊地区登革热媒介控制方法的多国研究。
Pathog Glob Health. 2012 Dec;106(8):428-35. doi: 10.1179/2047773212Y.0000000055.
4
Building and analyzing an innovative community-centered dengue-ecosystem management intervention in Yogyakarta, Indonesia.在印度尼西亚日惹建立并分析一个创新性的以社区为中心的登革热-生态系统管理干预措施。
Pathog Glob Health. 2012 Dec;106(8):469-78. doi: 10.1179/2047773212Y.0000000062.
5
Estimating dengue vector abundance in the wet and dry season: implications for targeted vector control in urban and peri-urban Asia.估算雨季和旱季的登革热媒介丰度:对亚洲城市和城郊地区有针对性的病媒控制的影响。
Pathog Glob Health. 2012 Dec;106(8):436-45. doi: 10.1179/2047773212Y.0000000063.
6
Community-centred eco-bio-social approach to control dengue vectors: an intervention study from Myanmar.以社区为中心的生态-生物-社会方法控制登革热媒介:来自缅甸的干预研究。
Pathog Glob Health. 2012 Dec;106(8):461-8. doi: 10.1179/2047773212Y.0000000057.
7
Improved dengue fever prevention through innovative intervention methods in the city of Salto, Uruguay.通过创新干预方法在乌拉圭萨尔托市加强登革热预防
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Feb;109(2):134-42. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/tru183.
8
Ecological, biological and social dimensions of dengue vector breeding in five urban settings of Latin America: a multi-country study.拉丁美洲五个城市环境、生物和社会因素对登革热传播媒介滋生的影响:一项多国研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Jan 21;14:38. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-38.
9
Application of eco-friendly tools and eco-bio-social strategies to control dengue vectors in urban and peri-urban settings in Thailand.应用环保工具和生态-生物-社会策略在泰国城市和城郊地区控制登革热媒介。
Pathog Glob Health. 2012 Dec;106(8):446-54. doi: 10.1179/2047773212Y.0000000059.
10
Reducing costs and operational constraints of dengue vector control by targeting productive breeding places: a multi-country non-inferiority cluster randomized trial.通过针对有效繁殖地降低登革热病媒控制的成本和操作限制:一项多国非劣效性整群随机试验
Trop Med Int Health. 2009 Sep;14(9):1143-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2009.02341.x. Epub 2009 Jul 14.

引用本文的文献

1
One Health, many approaches: integrated vector management strategies support One Health goals.同一健康,多种方法:综合病媒管理策略助力实现同一健康目标。
Front Insect Sci. 2025 Jun 3;5:1549348. doi: 10.3389/finsc.2025.1549348. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparison of unmanned aerial vehicle imaging to ground truth walkthroughs for identifying and classifying trash sites serving as potential Aedes aegypti breeding grounds.无人机成像与实地巡查对比,以识别和分类作为埃及伊蚊潜在滋生地的垃圾场。
Parasit Vectors. 2025 Mar 6;18(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s13071-025-06706-1.
3
Empowering Communities through Citizen Science: Dengue Prevention in Córdoba.

本文引用的文献

1
Eco-bio-social determinants of dengue vector breeding: a multicountry study in urban and periurban Asia.登革热媒介滋生的生态-生物-社会决定因素:亚洲城市和城郊多国研究。
Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Mar;88(3):173-84. doi: 10.2471/BLT.09.067892.
2
Dengue vector-control services: how do they work? A systematic literature review and country case studies.登革热病媒控制服务:它们如何运作?系统文献回顾和国家案例研究。
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2010 Jun;104(6):379-86. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2009.07.027. Epub 2010 Apr 18.
3
Knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding dengue fever among adults of high and low socioeconomic groups.
通过公民科学赋能社区:科尔多瓦的登革热预防
Biology (Basel). 2024 Oct 15;13(10):826. doi: 10.3390/biology13100826.
4
Neighborly social pressure and collective action: Evidence from a field experiment in Tunisia.邻里社会压力与集体行动:来自突尼斯实地实验的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 19;19(7):e0304269. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304269. eCollection 2024.
5
Use of Household Insecticides against Mosquitoes in Dengue-Endemic Areas in Sri Lanka.斯里兰卡登革热流行地区家用杀虫剂的使用情况。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2024 Jan 23;110(3):549-556. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.22-0639. Print 2024 Mar 6.
6
Facing the escalating burden of dengue: Challenges and perspectives.面对登革热不断升级的负担:挑战与展望
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Dec 15;3(12):e0002598. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002598. eCollection 2023.
7
Facilitators and barriers to engaging communities in health service research on dengue control in Indo-Pacific region: a systematic review.促进和阻碍亚太地区社区参与登革热控制卫生服务研究的因素:系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 5;23(1):1924. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16845-8.
8
Risk of dengue, Zika, and chikungunya transmission in the metropolitan area of Cucuta, Colombia: cross-sectional analysis, baseline for a cluster-randomised controlled trial of a novel vector tool for water containers.哥伦比亚库库塔大都市区登革热、寨卡和基孔肯雅热传播风险:横断面分析,新型水容器病媒控制工具群组随机对照试验的基线
BMC Public Health. 2023 May 30;23(1):1000. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15893-4.
9
Women's participation in the prevention and control of dengue using environmental methods in the global south: a qualitative meta-synthesis.在全球南方,利用环境方法促进女性参与登革热的预防和控制:定性元分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Sep 23;21(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01726-0.
10
Tackling the Ubiquity of Plastic Waste for Human and Planetary Health.应对塑料垃圾的普遍存在,以促进人类和地球健康。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021 Nov 8;106(1):12-14. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-0968.
高社会经济群体和低社会经济群体成年人对登革热的认知、态度和行为
J Pak Med Assoc. 2010 Mar;60(3):243-7.
4
Severe dengue epidemics in Sri Lanka, 2003-2006.2003 - 2006年斯里兰卡的严重登革热疫情
Emerg Infect Dis. 2009 Feb;15(2):192-9. doi: 10.3201/eid1502.080926.
5
Entomological studies for surveillance and prevention of dengue in arid and semi-arid districts of Rajasthan, India.印度拉贾斯坦邦干旱和半干旱地区登革热监测与预防的昆虫学研究
J Vector Borne Dis. 2008 Jun;45(2):124-32.
6
Pupal/demographic surveys to inform dengue-vector control.用于为登革热媒介控制提供信息的蛹/人口调查。
Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2006 Apr;100 Suppl 1:S1-S3. doi: 10.1179/136485906X105462.
7
Dengue fever: new paradigms for a changing epidemiology.登革热:不断变化的流行病学的新范式
Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2005 Mar 2;2(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1742-7622-2-1.