Suppr超能文献

成年神经重症监护患者应激性溃疡预防的风险与益处:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

Risks and benefits of stress ulcer prophylaxis in adult neurocritical care patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Liu Bolin, Liu Shujuan, Yin Anan, Siddiqi Javed

机构信息

Division of Neurosurgery, Arrowhead Regional Medical Center, 400 North Pepper Avenue, Colton, CA, 92324, USA.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2015 Nov 17;19:409. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-1107-2.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Neurocritical care patients are at high risk for stress-related upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the risks and benefits of stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) in this patient group.

METHODS

A systematic search of major electronic literature databases was conducted. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which researchers compared the effects of SUP (with proton pump inhibitors or histamine 2 receptor antagonists) with placebo or no prophylaxis in neurocritical care patients. The primary outcome was UGI bleeding, and secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality and nosocomial pneumonia. Study heterogeneity was sought and quantified. The results were reported as risk ratios/relative risks (RRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

We included 8 RCTs comprising an aggregate of 829 neurocritical care patients. Among these trials, one study conducted in a non-intensive care unit setting that did not meet our inclusion criteria was ultimately included based on further evaluation. All studies were judged as having a high or unclear risk of bias. SUP was more effective than placebo or no prophylaxis at reducing UGI bleeding (random effects: RR 0.31; 95 % CI 0.20-0.47; P < 0.00001; I (2) = 45 %) and all-cause mortality (fixed effects: RR 0.70; 95 % CI 0.50-0.98; P = 0.04; I (2) = 0 %). There was no difference between SUP and placebo or no prophylaxis regarding nosocomial pneumonia (random effects: RR 1.14; 95 % CI 0.67-1.94; P = 0.62; I (2) = 42 %). The slight asymmetry of the funnel plots raised the concern of small trial bias, and apparent heterogeneity existed in participants, interventions, control treatments, and outcome measures.

CONCLUSIONS

In neurocritical care patients, SUP seems to be more effective than placebo or no prophylaxis in preventing UGI bleeding and reducing all-cause mortality while not increasing the risk of nosocomial pneumonia. The robustness of this conclusion is limited by a lack of trials with a low risk of bias, sparse data, heterogeneity among trials, and a concern regarding small trial bias.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) identifier: CRD42015015802 . Date of registration: 6 Jan 2015.

摘要

引言

神经重症监护患者发生应激相关上消化道(UGI)出血的风险很高。本荟萃分析的目的是评估该患者群体中应激性溃疡预防(SUP)的风险和益处。

方法

对主要电子文献数据库进行系统检索。符合条件的研究为随机对照试验(RCT),其中研究人员比较了SUP(使用质子泵抑制剂或组胺2受体拮抗剂)与安慰剂或不进行预防对神经重症监护患者的影响。主要结局是UGI出血,次要结局是全因死亡率和医院获得性肺炎。寻找并量化研究异质性。结果以风险比/相对风险(RRs)及95%置信区间(CIs)报告。

结果

我们纳入了8项RCT,共829例神经重症监护患者。在这些试验中,有一项在非重症监护病房环境中进行的研究不符合我们的纳入标准,但经进一步评估后最终被纳入。所有研究均被判定存在高偏倚风险或偏倚风险不明确。SUP在降低UGI出血方面比安慰剂或不进行预防更有效(随机效应:RR 0.31;95% CI 0.20 - 0.47;P < 0.00001;I² = 45%)以及全因死亡率(固定效应:RR 0.70;95% CI 0.50 - 0.98;P = 0.04;I² = 0%)。SUP与安慰剂或不进行预防在医院获得性肺炎方面无差异(随机效应:RR 1.14;95% CI 0.67 - 1.94;P = 0.62;I² = 42%)。漏斗图的轻微不对称引发了对小样本试验偏倚的担忧,并且在参与者、干预措施、对照治疗和结局测量方面存在明显的异质性。

结论

在神经重症监护患者中,SUP在预防UGI出血和降低全因死亡率方面似乎比安慰剂或不进行预防更有效,同时不会增加医院获得性肺炎的风险。这一结论的稳健性受到缺乏低偏倚风险试验、数据稀疏、试验间异质性以及对小样本试验偏倚的担忧的限制。

试验注册

国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)标识符:CRD42015015802。注册日期:2015年1月6日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99f4/4650140/e72d0fea8479/13054_2015_1107_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验