Translational Research Unit, Angel H. Roffo Cancer Institute, Av. San Martín 5481, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Jun;21(6):1685-90. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1714-2. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
This study aims to determine the relationship between weakness and bioimpedance analysis (BIA)-derived phase angle in a population of untreated cancer patients with fatigue.
We prospectively evaluated 41 treatment-naive cancer patients of several origins that presented with performance status 1-2, weight loss >5% in the last 6 months, and Fatigue Numeral Scale score >4. Weakness was considered a physical component of the multidimensional fatigue syndrome and was evaluated through several parameters utilizing hand grip strength technique by dinamometry. The same assessment was also performed on a healthy control population (n = 20). BIA-derived phase angle was also determined by BIA.
Compared to healthy controls, cancer patients exhibited significant differences in all the parameters: median fatigue was 6 (range 5-9), evaluated maximal strength mean was 27 ± 10.71 vs. 42 ± 10.74 kg (p < 0.0001 for patients vs. control, respectively), and muscle strength difference (max-min muscle strength) was also statistically different (p < 0.0001). We also determined parameter associations within the patient population. We found statistical significant correlations between median phase angle score and endurance muscle with percentage of weight loss (r = 0.43, p = 0.03) for head and neck cancer patients, and in non-small cell lung cancer patients, grip work correlated significantly with normal or decreased phase angle (r = 0.85), p = 0.006 (Spearman Rank Correlation).
Weakness could be correlated with normal or decreased phase angle in a population with ambulatory advanced cancer with fatigue naive of treatment. We also found a significant relationship between median phase angle score and endurance muscle with percentage of weight loss in the subpopulation of patients with head and neck carcinoma.
本研究旨在确定虚弱与未经治疗的癌症伴疲劳患者生物电阻抗分析(BIA)得出的相位角之间的关系。
我们前瞻性评估了 41 名来自不同起源、表现状态为 1-2 级、6 个月内体重减轻>5%且疲劳数字评分量表>4 的未经治疗的癌症患者。虚弱被认为是多维疲劳综合征的身体成分,并通过使用测力技术评估手握力来通过多个参数进行评估。同样的评估也在健康对照组(n=20)中进行。BIA 还通过 BIA 确定了 BIA 得出的相位角。
与健康对照组相比,癌症患者在所有参数上均存在显著差异:中位疲劳为 6(范围为 5-9),评估的最大力量平均值为 27±10.71 与 42±10.74kg(患者与对照组相比,p<0.0001),肌肉力量差异(最大-最小肌肉力量)也存在统计学差异(p<0.0001)。我们还确定了患者人群中的参数相关性。我们发现,在头颈部癌症患者中,中位相位角评分与耐力肌肉与体重减轻百分比之间存在统计学显著相关性(r=0.43,p=0.03),在非小细胞肺癌患者中,握力与正常或降低的相位角显著相关(r=0.85),p=0.006(Spearman 秩相关)。
在未经治疗的伴有疲劳的活动性晚期癌症患者中,虚弱可能与正常或降低的相位角相关。我们还发现,在头颈部癌患者亚组中,中位相位角评分与耐力肌肉与体重减轻百分比之间存在显著关系。