Blavette Lauriane, Dacunha Sébastien, Alameda-Pineda Xavier, Hernández García Daniel, Gannot Sharon, Gras Florian, Gunson Nancie, Lemaignan Séverin, Polic Michal, Tandeitnik Pinchas, Tonini Francesco, Rigaud Anne-Sophie, Pino Maribel
Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale - Optimisation thérapeutique en pharmacologie OTEN U1144, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Broca, Centre Mémoire de Ressources et Recherches Île-de-France-Broca, Service gériatrie 1&2, Paris, France.
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Aug 1;12:e76496. doi: 10.2196/76496.
Socially assistive robots (SARs) hold promise for supporting older adults (OAs) in hospital settings by promoting social engagement, reducing loneliness, and enhancing emotional well-being. They may also assist health care professionals by delivering information, managing routines, and alleviating workload. However, their acceptability and usability remain major challenges, particularly in dynamic real-world care environments.
This study aimed to evaluate the acceptability and usability of a SAR in a geriatric day care hospital (DCH) and to identify key factors influencing its adoption by OAs and their informal caregivers.
Over the course of 1 year, 97 participants (n=65, 67%, OA patients and n=32, 33%, informal caregivers) took part in a mixed methods evaluation of ARI, a socially assistive humanoid robot developed by PAL Robotics. ARI was deployed in the waiting area of a geriatric day care robot in Paris (France), where it interacted with users through voice-based dialogue. After each session, participants completed 2 standardized assessments, the Acceptability E-scale (AES) and the System Usability Scale (SUS), administered orally to ensure accessibility. Open-ended qualitative feedback was also collected to capture subjective experiences and contextual perceptions.
Acceptability scores significantly increased across waves (wave 1: mean 15.4/30, SD 5.81; wave 2: mean 20.9/30, SD 5.25; wave 3: mean 22.5/30, SD 4.23; P<.001). Usability scores also improved (wave 1: mean 47.9/100, SD 24.18; wave 2: mean 57.4/100, SD 22.46; wave 3: mean 69.3/100, SD 16.03; P<.001). A strong positive correlation was observed between acceptability and usability scores (r=0.664, P<.001). Qualitative findings indicated improved ease of use, clarity, and user satisfaction over time, particularly following the integration of a large language model (LLM) in wave 2, leading to more coherent, natural, and context-aware interactions.
Successive system enhancements, most notably the integration of an LLM, led to measurable gains in usability and acceptability among patients and informal caregivers. These findings underscore the importance of iterative, user-centered design in deploying SARs in geriatric care environments.
Approved by the French national ethics committee (CPP Ouest II, IRB: 2021/20) as it did not involve randomization or clinical intervention.
社交辅助机器人(SARs)有望通过促进社交参与、减少孤独感和提升情绪健康,在医院环境中为老年人(OAs)提供支持。它们还可以通过提供信息、管理日常事务和减轻工作量来协助医护人员。然而,它们的可接受性和可用性仍然是重大挑战,尤其是在动态的现实世界护理环境中。
本研究旨在评估一款社交辅助机器人在老年日间护理医院(DCH)的可接受性和可用性,并确定影响老年人及其非正式护理人员采用该机器人的关键因素。
在1年的时间里,97名参与者(n = 65,67%,老年患者;n = 32,33%,非正式护理人员)参与了对ARI的混合方法评估,ARI是一款由PAL机器人公司开发的社交辅助人形机器人。ARI被部署在法国巴黎一家老年日间护理机器人的等候区,在那里它通过基于语音的对话与用户互动。每次会话结束后,参与者完成2项标准化评估,即口头进行的可接受性E量表(AES)和系统可用性量表(SUS),以确保可及性。还收集了开放式定性反馈,以捕捉主观体验和情境感知。
各阶段的可接受性得分显著提高(第1阶段:平均15.4/30,标准差5.81;第2阶段:平均20.9/30,标准差5.25;第3阶段:平均22.5/30,标准差4.23;P <.001)。可用性得分也有所提高(第1阶段:平均47.9/100,标准差24.18;第2阶段:平均57.4/100,标准差22.46;第3阶段:平均69.3/100,标准差16.03;P <.001)。可接受性得分与可用性得分之间存在强正相关(r = 0.664,P <.001)。定性研究结果表明,随着时间的推移,易用性、清晰度和用户满意度有所提高,特别是在第2阶段集成了大语言模型(LLM)之后,带来了更连贯、自然和情境感知的交互。
系统的持续改进,最显著的是集成了大语言模型,导致患者和非正式护理人员在可用性和可接受性方面取得了可衡量的进步。这些发现强调了在老年护理环境中部署社交辅助机器人时,采用迭代式、以用户为中心的设计的重要性。
经法国国家伦理委员会(CPP Ouest II,IRB:2021/20)批准,因为该研究不涉及随机化或临床干预。