痴呆个体对可食用和消遣物品的偏好评估。
Assessment of preference for edible and leisure items in individuals with dementia.
机构信息
University of Manitoba and St. Amant Research Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2, Canada.
出版信息
J Appl Behav Anal. 2012 Winter;45(4):839-44. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2012.45-839.
Abstract
We conducted 2 studies on reinforcer preference in patients with dementia. Results of preference assessments yielded differential selections by 14 participants. Unlike prior studies with individuals with intellectual disabilities, all participants showed a noticeable preference for leisure items over edible items. Results of a subsequent analysis with 3 participants showed reinforcement effects when highly preferred items were delivered as consequences.
摘要
我们进行了两项关于痴呆患者强化物偏好的研究。偏好评估的结果显示，有 14 名参与者做出了不同的选择。与先前针对智障人士的研究不同，所有参与者都明显更喜欢休闲物品而不是食物。对 3 名参与者进行的后续分析显示，当高度偏好的物品作为后果呈现时，会产生强化效果。
相似文献
1
Assessment of preference for edible and leisure items in individuals with dementia.痴呆个体对可食用和消遣物品的偏好评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2012 Winter;45(4):839-44. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2012.45-839.
2
Preference for leisure items over edible items in individuals with dementia: A replication.痴呆个体对休闲物品而非食用物品的偏好：一项复制研究。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2020 Jul;53(3):1780-1788. doi: 10.1002/jaba.679. Epub 2020 Jan 19.
3
Effects of Magnitude on the Displacement of Leisure Items by Edible Items During Preference Assessments.大小效应对偏好评估中可食用物品置换休闲物品的影响。
Behav Modif. 2020 Sep;44(5):727-745. doi: 10.1177/0145445519843937. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
4
Stability of preference and reinforcing efficacy of edible, leisure, and social attention stimuli.可食用、休闲和社交注意力刺激物的偏好稳定性和强化效力。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2021 Apr;54(2):684-699. doi: 10.1002/jaba.807. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
5
Comparison of edible and leisure reinforcers.可食用强化物与休闲强化物的比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2015 Summer;48(2):331-43. doi: 10.1002/jaba.200. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
6
Displacement of leisure reinforcers by food during preference assessments.在偏好评估期间，食物对休闲强化物的替代作用。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):475-84. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-475.
7
Validity of the multiple-stimulus without replacement preference assessment for edible items.无替换多选偏好评估法在可食用物品评估中的有效性。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2020 Jul;53(3):1688-1701. doi: 10.1002/jaba.703. Epub 2020 Apr 19.
8
Distributed and accumulated reinforcement arrangements: evaluations of efficacy and preference.分布式和累积强化安排：疗效和偏好评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2014 Summer;47(2):293-313. doi: 10.1002/jaba.116. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
9
Relative preferences for edible and leisure stimuli in children with autism.自闭症儿童对可食用和休闲刺激物的相对偏好。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2019 May;52(2):557-573. doi: 10.1002/jaba.525. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
10
Some determinants of changes in preference over time.偏好随时间变化的一些决定因素。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2006 Summer;39(2):189-202. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2006.163-04.
引用本文的文献
1
Assessment-Informed Intervention for Aphasia in an Older Adult: Transfer of Stimulus Control Procedure Considerations.针对老年人失语症的基于评估的干预：刺激控制程序考量的迁移
Anal Verbal Behav. 2021 Aug 10;37(2):226-236. doi: 10.1007/s40616-021-00153-6. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
Priorities and Preferences of People Living with Dementia or Cognitive Impairment - A Systematic Review.痴呆症或认知障碍患者的优先事项和偏好——一项系统综述
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Dec 14;15:2793-2807. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S333923. eCollection 2021.
3
Tactics to Evaluate the Evidence Base of a Nonbehavioral Intervention in an Expanded Consumer Area.评估扩展消费领域中非行为干预证据基础的策略。
Behav Anal Pract. 2018 Oct 24;12(3):677-687. doi: 10.1007/s40617-018-00308-3. eCollection 2019 Sep.
4
Behavior-Analytic Approaches to Working with People with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities who Develop Dementia: a Review of the Literature.针对患有痴呆症的智力和发育障碍者的行为分析干预方法：文献综述
Behav Anal Pract. 2018 Jun 13;12(1):255-264. doi: 10.1007/s40617-018-0270-8. eCollection 2019 Mar.
本文引用的文献
1
Applications of Preference Assessment Procedures in Depression and Agitation Management in Elders with Dementia.偏好评估程序在老年痴呆症患者抑郁和激越管理中的应用
Clin Gerontol. 2009;32(3):239-259. doi: 10.1080/07317110902895226. Epub 2009 May 20.
2
Taste in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病患者的味觉。
J Neurol. 2010 Feb;257(2):238-46. doi: 10.1007/s00415-009-5300-6. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
3
Increasing activity attendance and engagement in individuals with dementia using descriptive prompts.使用描述性提示提高痴呆症患者的活动参与度和参与程度。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2008 Summer;41(2):273-7. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-273.
4
On the law of effect.关于效果律。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):243-66. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243.
5
Leisure activities and the risk of dementia in the elderly.老年人的休闲活动与痴呆症风险
N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 19;348(25):2508-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022252.
6
On the displacement of leisure items by food during multiple-stimulus preference assessments.在多重刺激偏好评估期间休闲物品被食物取代的情况。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1999 Winter;32(4):515-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-515.
7
Taste and smell losses in normal aging and disease.正常衰老和疾病过程中的味觉和嗅觉丧失。
JAMA. 1997;278(16):1357-62.
8
Displacement of leisure reinforcers by food during preference assessments.在偏好评估期间，食物对休闲强化物的替代作用。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):475-84. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-475.
9
Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences.评估用于评估强化物偏好的多重刺激呈现形式。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Winter;29(4):519-32; quiz 532-3. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-519.
10
The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules.临床痴呆评定量表（CDR）：当前版本及评分规则。
Neurology. 1993 Nov;43(11):2412-4. doi: 10.1212/wnl.43.11.2412-a.
Zotero 插件