Suppr超能文献

偏好随时间变化的一些决定因素。

Some determinants of changes in preference over time.

作者信息

Hanley Gregory P, Iwata Brian A, Roscoe Eileen M

机构信息

Applied Behavioral Science Department, 1000 Sunnyside Ave., University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 2006 Summer;39(2):189-202. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2006.163-04.

Abstract

Results of longitudinal studies suggest that the stability of preferences varies across individuals, although it is unclear what variables account for these differences. We extended this work by conducting periodic assessments of preference for leisure activities over 3 to 6 months with 10 adults with developmental disabilities. Although previous research has collectively shown that preferences identified via repeated assessment are highly variable, our results showed that preferences were relatively stable for the majority (80%) of participants. In an attempt to identify some environmental determinants of shifts in preference, we provided extended daily access to high-preference items (preference-weakening manipulation) and paired access to low-preference items with social and edible putative reinforcers during brief sessions (preference-strengthening manipulation). Preference assessments continued over the course of these manipulations with 2 participants. Results showed that changes in preference across time could be produced systematically and suggest that naturally occurring changes in establishing operations or conditioning histories contribute to temporal shifts in preference. Implications for preference assessments, reinforcer usage, and planned attempts to change preferences are discussed.

摘要

纵向研究结果表明,偏好的稳定性因人而异,尽管尚不清楚哪些变量导致了这些差异。我们通过对10名发育障碍成年人在3至6个月内对休闲活动的偏好进行定期评估,扩展了这项研究。尽管先前的研究总体表明,通过重复评估确定的偏好具有高度变异性,但我们的结果显示,大多数(80%)参与者的偏好相对稳定。为了确定偏好变化的一些环境决定因素,我们在较长时间内每天提供高偏好物品(偏好减弱操作),并在短时间内将低偏好物品与社交和可食用的假定强化物配对提供(偏好增强操作)。在这些操作过程中,对2名参与者继续进行偏好评估。结果表明,偏好随时间的变化可以系统地产生,这表明建立操作或条件作用历史中的自然变化会导致偏好的时间性变化。文中还讨论了对偏好评估、强化物使用以及改变偏好的计划尝试的影响。

相似文献

1
Some determinants of changes in preference over time.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2006 Summer;39(2):189-202. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2006.163-04.
2
Stability of preference and reinforcing efficacy of edible, leisure, and social attention stimuli.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2021 Apr;54(2):684-699. doi: 10.1002/jaba.807. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
3
Effects of Magnitude on the Displacement of Leisure Items by Edible Items During Preference Assessments.
Behav Modif. 2020 Sep;44(5):727-745. doi: 10.1177/0145445519843937. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
4
Longitudinal analysis of leisure-item preferences.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Summer;34(2):179-84. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-179.
5
A review of methods of assessing preference for social stimuli.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2023 Apr;56(2):416-427. doi: 10.1002/jaba.981. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
8
The effects of establishing operations on preferences for tangible items.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2005 Spring;38(1):107-10. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2005.112-03.
10
Evaluating the effects of social interaction on the results of preference assessments for leisure items.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2022 Mar;55(2):430-450. doi: 10.1002/jaba.897. Epub 2021 Dec 27.

引用本文的文献

1
A Review of the Environmental Variables Included in Mand Training Interventions.
Anal Verbal Behav. 2024 Dec 6;40(2):345-378. doi: 10.1007/s40616-024-00211-9. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
A Survey of Why and How Clinicians Change Reinforcers during Teaching Sessions.
Behav Anal Pract. 2023 Aug 29;17(3):815-830. doi: 10.1007/s40617-023-00847-4. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Stimulus Preference Assessment Decision-Making System (SPADS): A Decision-Making Model for Practitioners.
Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Apr 30;14(4):1144-1156. doi: 10.1007/s40617-020-00539-3. eCollection 2021 Dec.
5
Use of an Online Training with Virtual Role Play to Teach Preference Assessment Implementation.
J Dev Phys Disabil. 2021;33(6):931-945. doi: 10.1007/s10882-021-09788-8. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
6
Use of Repeated Within-Subject Measures to Assess Infants' Preference for Similar Others.
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 3;10:2239. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02239. eCollection 2019.
7
Rapid Assessment of Attention Types for the Treatment of Attention-Maintained Problem Behavior.
Behav Anal Pract. 2018 Sep 28;11(4):417-423. doi: 10.1007/s40617-018-00300-x. eCollection 2018 Dec 31.
8
Stability of infants' preference for prosocial others: Implications for research based on single-choice paradigms.
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 2;12(6):e0178818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178818. eCollection 2017.
10
Increasing accurate preference assessment implementation through pyramidal training.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2012 Summer;45(2):345-59. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2012.45-345.

本文引用的文献

1
Conditioned reinforcement: Experimental and theoretical issues.
Behav Anal. 1994 Fall;17(2):261-85. doi: 10.1007/BF03392675.
2
Establishing operations.
Behav Anal. 1993 Fall;16(2):191-206. doi: 10.1007/BF03392623.
4
Response-restriction analysis: II. Alteration of activity preferences.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2003 Spring;36(1):59-76. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2003.36-59.
5
Longitudinal analysis of leisure-item preferences.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Summer;34(2):179-84. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-179.
7
Effects of deprivation on engagement in preferred activities by persons with developmental disabilities.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Winter;33(4):495-506. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-495.
8
Evaluation of a brief multiple-stimulus preference assessment in a naturalistic context.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Fall;33(3):353-7. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-353.
9
The effects of establishing operations on preference assessment outcomes.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Spring;33(1):85-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-85.
10
Analysis of activity preferences as a function of differential consequences.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1999 Winter;32(4):419-35. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-419.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验