Hanley Gregory P, Iwata Brian A, Roscoe Eileen M
Applied Behavioral Science Department, 1000 Sunnyside Ave., University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2006 Summer;39(2):189-202. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2006.163-04.
Results of longitudinal studies suggest that the stability of preferences varies across individuals, although it is unclear what variables account for these differences. We extended this work by conducting periodic assessments of preference for leisure activities over 3 to 6 months with 10 adults with developmental disabilities. Although previous research has collectively shown that preferences identified via repeated assessment are highly variable, our results showed that preferences were relatively stable for the majority (80%) of participants. In an attempt to identify some environmental determinants of shifts in preference, we provided extended daily access to high-preference items (preference-weakening manipulation) and paired access to low-preference items with social and edible putative reinforcers during brief sessions (preference-strengthening manipulation). Preference assessments continued over the course of these manipulations with 2 participants. Results showed that changes in preference across time could be produced systematically and suggest that naturally occurring changes in establishing operations or conditioning histories contribute to temporal shifts in preference. Implications for preference assessments, reinforcer usage, and planned attempts to change preferences are discussed.
纵向研究结果表明,偏好的稳定性因人而异,尽管尚不清楚哪些变量导致了这些差异。我们通过对10名发育障碍成年人在3至6个月内对休闲活动的偏好进行定期评估,扩展了这项研究。尽管先前的研究总体表明,通过重复评估确定的偏好具有高度变异性,但我们的结果显示,大多数(80%)参与者的偏好相对稳定。为了确定偏好变化的一些环境决定因素,我们在较长时间内每天提供高偏好物品(偏好减弱操作),并在短时间内将低偏好物品与社交和可食用的假定强化物配对提供(偏好增强操作)。在这些操作过程中,对2名参与者继续进行偏好评估。结果表明,偏好随时间的变化可以系统地产生,这表明建立操作或条件作用历史中的自然变化会导致偏好的时间性变化。文中还讨论了对偏好评估、强化物使用以及改变偏好的计划尝试的影响。