Surgery Unit, Institute of Child Health and Great Ormond Street Hospital, University College London, London WC1N 1EH, United Kingdom.
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Dec 21;18(47):6900-7. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i47.6900.
A number of congenital and acquired disorders require esophageal tissue replacement. Various surgical techniques, such as gastric and colonic interposition, are standards of treatment, but frequently complicated by stenosis and other problems. Regenerative medicine approaches facilitate the use of biological constructs to replace or regenerate normal tissue function. We review the literature of esophageal tissue engineering, discuss its implications, compare the methodologies that have been employed and suggest possible directions for the future. Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, National Research Register and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched with the following search terms: stem cell and esophagus, esophageal replacement, esophageal tissue engineering, esophageal substitution. Reference lists of papers identified were also examined and experts in this field contacted for further information. All full-text articles in English of all potentially relevant abstracts were reviewed. Tissue engineering has involved acellular scaffolds that were either transplanted with the aim of being repopulated by host cells or seeded prior to transplantation. When acellular scaffolds were used to replace patch and short tubular defects they allowed epithelial and partial muscular migration whereas when employed for long tubular defects the results were poor leading to an increased rate of stenosis and mortality. Stenting has been shown as an effective means to reduce stenotic changes and promote cell migration, whilst omental wrapping to induce vascularization of the construct has an uncertain benefit. Decellularized matrices have been recently suggested as the optimal choice for scaffolds, but smart polymers that will incorporate signalling to promote cell-scaffold interaction may provide a more reproducible and available solution. Results in animal models that have used seeded scaffolds strongly suggest that seeding of both muscle and epithelial cells on scaffolds prior to implantation is a prerequisite for complete esophageal replacement. Novel approaches need to be designed to allow for peristalsis and vascularization in the engineered esophagus. Although esophageal tissue engineering potentially offers a real alternative to conventional treatments for severe esophageal disease, important barriers remain that need to be addressed.
许多先天性和获得性疾病需要食管组织替代。各种外科技术,如胃和结肠间置术,是治疗的标准方法,但常伴有狭窄和其他问题。再生医学方法促进了使用生物构建体来替代或再生正常组织功能。我们回顾了食管组织工程的文献,讨论了其意义,比较了已采用的方法,并为未来提出了可能的方向。我们使用以下搜索词搜索了 Medline、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、国家研究登记处和 ClinicalTrials.gov 数据库:干细胞和食管、食管替代、食管组织工程、食管替代。还检查了已确定论文的参考文献列表,并联系了该领域的专家以获取更多信息。审查了所有英文全文文章,对所有潜在相关摘要进行了审查。组织工程涉及无细胞支架,这些支架要么被移植,目的是被宿主细胞重新填充,要么在移植前被接种。当无细胞支架用于替代补丁和短管状缺陷时,它们允许上皮和部分肌肉迁移,而当用于长管状缺陷时,结果很差,导致狭窄和死亡率增加。支架已被证明是减少狭窄变化和促进细胞迁移的有效手段,而网膜包裹以诱导构建体的血管化具有不确定的益处。最近有人建议脱细胞基质是支架的最佳选择,但将信号整合到智能聚合物中以促进细胞-支架相互作用可能提供更可重复和可用的解决方案。在使用接种支架的动物模型中获得的结果强烈表明,在植入支架之前,对支架进行肌肉和上皮细胞的接种是完全替代食管的前提条件。需要设计新的方法来允许工程食管中的蠕动和血管化。尽管食管组织工程为严重食管疾病的传统治疗提供了真正的替代方案,但仍存在需要解决的重要障碍。