• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

错失良机:离开急诊而未得到诊治的患者的几率。

Missing the boat: odds for the patients who leave ED without being seen.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

BMC Emerg Med. 2013 Jan 16;13:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-13-1.

DOI:10.1186/1471-227X-13-1
PMID:23324162
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3571890/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A patient left without being seen is a well-recognized indicator of Emergency Department overcrowding. The aim of this study was to define the characteristics of LWBS patients, their rates and associated factors from a tertiary care hospital of Pakistan.

METHODS

A retrospective patient record review was undertaken. All patients presenting to the Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, between April and December of the year 2010, were included in the study. Information was collected on age, sex, presenting complaints, ED capacity, month, time, shift, day of the week, and waiting times in the ED. A basic descriptive analysis was made and the rates of LWBS patients were determined among the patient subgroups. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the risk factors associated with a patient not being seen in the ED.

RESULTS

A total of 38,762 patients visited ED during the study period. Among them 5,086 (13%) patients left without being seen. Percentage of leaving was highest in the night shift (20%). The percentage was twice as high when the ED was on diversion (19.8%) compared to regular periods of operation (9.8%). Mean waiting time before leaving the ED in pediatric patients was 154 minutes while for adults it was 171 minutes. More than 32% of patients had waited for more than 180 minutes before they left without being seen, compared to the patients who were seen in ED. Important predictors for LWBS included; Triage category P4 i.e. walk -in-patients had an OR of 13.62(8.72-21.3), Diversion status, OR 1.49(1.26-1.76), night shift , OR 2.44(1.95-3.05) and Pediatric age, OR 0.57(0.48-0.66).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study elucidates the LWBS population characteristics and identifies the risk factors for this phenomenon. Targeted interventions should be planned and implemented to decrease the waiting time and alternate services should be provided for high-risk patients (for LWBS) to minimize their number.

摘要

背景

未得到诊治就离开的患者是急诊科过度拥挤的一个公认指标。本研究旨在确定巴基斯坦一家三级护理医院的离开未诊治患者(LWBS)患者的特征、其发生率以及相关因素。

方法

我们开展了一项回顾性病历审查。本研究纳入了 2010 年 4 月至 12 月期间在卡拉奇阿迦汗大学医院就诊的所有患者。收集的信息包括年龄、性别、就诊主诉、急诊科容量、月份、时间、班次、星期几和在急诊科的等候时间。我们进行了基本描述性分析,并确定了亚组患者中 LWBS 患者的发生率。我们采用 logistic 回归分析评估与患者未在急诊科接受诊治相关的风险因素。

结果

在研究期间,共有 38762 名患者到急诊科就诊。其中 5086 名(13%)患者离开时未得到诊治。夜间班次的离开率最高(20%)。当急诊科分流(19.8%)时,离开率是常规运营期间(9.8%)的两倍。儿科患者离开急诊科前的平均等候时间为 154 分钟,而成人患者的平均等候时间为 171 分钟。与在急诊科接受诊治的患者相比,超过 32%的患者在离开前等候了 180 多分钟。LWBS 的重要预测因素包括:分类级别 P4,即门诊患者的 OR 为 13.62(8.72-21.3)、分流状态,OR 为 1.49(1.26-1.76)、夜班,OR 为 2.44(1.95-3.05)和儿科年龄,OR 为 0.57(0.48-0.66)。

结论

我们的研究阐明了 LWBS 人群的特征,并确定了导致这种现象的风险因素。应计划和实施有针对性的干预措施,以减少等候时间,并应为高风险患者(LWBS)提供替代服务,以最大程度地减少其数量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3931/3571890/50e69f7bdf61/1471-227X-13-1-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3931/3571890/59b998b68432/1471-227X-13-1-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3931/3571890/cd1a08a8748d/1471-227X-13-1-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3931/3571890/50e69f7bdf61/1471-227X-13-1-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3931/3571890/59b998b68432/1471-227X-13-1-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3931/3571890/cd1a08a8748d/1471-227X-13-1-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3931/3571890/50e69f7bdf61/1471-227X-13-1-3.jpg

相似文献

1
Missing the boat: odds for the patients who leave ED without being seen.错失良机:离开急诊而未得到诊治的患者的几率。
BMC Emerg Med. 2013 Jan 16;13:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-13-1.
2
Patients who leave Emergency Department without being seen or during treatment in the Lazio Region (Central Italy): Determinants and short term outcomes.在拉齐奥地区(意大利中部),未被诊治或在治疗过程中离开急诊部的患者:决定因素和短期结局。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 12;13(12):e0208914. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208914. eCollection 2018.
3
Patients who present to the emergency department and leave without being seen: prevalence, predictors and outcomes.急诊未就诊患者:患病率、预测因素和结局。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2013 Aug;20(4):248-55. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328356fa0e.
4
Emergency department conditions associated with the number of patients who leave a pediatric emergency department before physician assessment.与在医生评估前离开儿科急诊科的患者数量相关的急诊科情况。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013 Oct;29(10):1082-90. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182a5cbc2.
5
Patients who leave without being seen in emergency departments: an analysis of predictive factors and outcomes.急诊未就诊患者:预测因素和结局分析。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Apr;19(4):439-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01327.x.
6
Setting wait times to achieve targeted left-without-being-seen rates.设置等待时间以实现目标的无需等待就诊率。
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Apr;32(4):342-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.12.047. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
7
Characteristics of patients who leave the emergency department without being seen: the first report in China.未经诊治即离开急诊科患者的特征:中国首份报告
Emerg Med Australas. 2014 Jun;26(3):243-8. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12167. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
8
Patient Characteristics and Clinical Process Predictors of Patients Leaving Without Being Seen from the Emergency Department.患者特征和临床流程预测因素与急诊未就诊患者离开的关系。
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Aug 25;21(5):1218-1226. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.6.47084.
9
"Should I stay or Should I go": patient who leave Emergency Department of an Italian Third-Level Teaching Hospital.“我该留下还是该离开”:离开意大利一家三级教学医院急诊科的患者。
Acta Biomed. 2018 Oct 8;89(3):430-436. doi: 10.23750/abm.v89i3.7596.
10
A 5-year time study analysis of emergency department patient care efficiency.急诊科患者护理效率的5年时间研究分析。
Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Sep;34(3):326-35. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(99)70126-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Associated With Leaving-Without-Being-Seen in Pediatric Emergency Department Patients.儿科急诊科患者未候诊即离开的相关因素
Cureus. 2024 Dec 7;16(12):e75277. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75277. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Emergency Department Patients Who Leave Before Treatment Is Complete.急诊未完成治疗即离院患者。
West J Emerg Med. 2021 Feb 26;22(2):148-155. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.11.48427.
3
Increasing consultant-level staffing as a proportion of overall physician coverage improves emergency department length of stay targets.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical characteristics of patients with dengue fever: report of 48 patients in 2010.登革热患者的临床特征:2010年48例患者报告
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2010 Oct-Dec;22(4):120-3.
2
Return visit characteristics among patients who leave without being seen from a pediatric ED.儿科急诊未就诊离院患者的复诊特征。
Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Sep;30(7):1019-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.06.017. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
3
Patients who leave emergency departments without being seen: literature review and English data analysis.未得到诊治即离开急诊部的患者:文献回顾与英文数据分析。
增加顾问级别的人员配备占医生总数的比例,可以改善急诊科的停留时间目标。
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Jan 13;21(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12873-020-00399-8.
4
The Impact of On-duty Emergency Medicine Trainees on Left-Without-Being-Seen Rates in an Academic Emergency Department.学术急诊部门中值班急诊医学实习生对未就诊离开率的影响。
Qatar Med J. 2020 Apr 1;2020(1):7. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2020.7. eCollection 2020.
5
Impact of Emergency Department Phlebotomists on Left-Before-Treatment-Completion Rates.急诊采血护士对治疗前完成率的影响。
West J Emerg Med. 2019 Jul;20(4):681-687. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2019.5.41736. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
6
Epidemiology of patients presenting to a pediatric emergency department in Karachi, Pakistan.巴基斯坦卡拉奇一家儿科急诊科就诊患者的流行病学情况。
BMC Emerg Med. 2018 Aug 3;18(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12873-018-0175-4.
7
Marginal analysis in assessing factors contributing time to physician in the Emergency Department using operations data.利用运营数据进行边际分析,以评估急诊科医生诊疗时间的影响因素。
Qatar Med J. 2017 Feb 24;2016(2):18. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2016.18. eCollection 2016.
8
How vital are the vital signs? A multi-center observational study from emergency departments of Pakistan.生命体征有多重要?一项来自巴基斯坦急诊科的多中心观察性研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2015;15 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S10. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-15-S2-S10. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
9
Identifying Patient Door-to-Room Goals to Minimize Left-Without-Being-Seen Rates.确定患者从入院到进入病房的目标以尽量降低未就诊离开率。
West J Emerg Med. 2015 Sep;16(5):611-8. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.7.25878. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
10
Use of the SONET Score to Evaluate High Volume Emergency Department Overcrowding: A Prospective Derivation and Validation Study.使用SONET评分评估急诊科高流量拥挤情况:一项前瞻性推导与验证研究。
Emerg Med Int. 2015;2015:401757. doi: 10.1155/2015/401757. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
Emerg Med J. 2012 Aug;29(8):617-21. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2011-200537. Epub 2011 Sep 2.
4
Modeling factors influencing the demand for emergency department services in Ontario: a comparison of methods.建模影响安大略省急诊服务需求的因素:方法比较。
BMC Emerg Med. 2011 Aug 19;11:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-11-13.
5
Association between waiting times and short term mortality and hospital admission after departure from emergency department: population based cohort study from Ontario, Canada.在离开急诊部后等待时间与短期死亡率和住院之间的关联:来自加拿大安大略省的基于人群的队列研究。
BMJ. 2011 Jun 1;342:d2983. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d2983.
6
Dengue Fever (DF) in Pakistan.巴基斯坦的登革热
Asia Pac Fam Med. 2011 Feb 24;10(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1447-056X-10-1.
7
Hospital determinants of emergency department left without being seen rates.急诊未就诊率的医院决定因素。
Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Jul;58(1):24-32.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.01.009. Epub 2011 Feb 21.
8
National study of patient, visit, and hospital characteristics associated with leaving an emergency department without being seen: predicting LWBS.国家研究患者、就诊和医院特征与离开急诊未被诊治的关系:预测 LWBS。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Oct;16(10):949-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00515.x.
9
Counter-Point: Frequent Users of the Emergency Department: Meeting Society's Needs.反驳观点:急诊科的频繁使用者:满足社会需求。
West J Emerg Med. 2009 Aug;10(3):195-6.
10
The impact of a fast track area on quality and effectiveness outcomes: a Middle Eastern emergency department perspective.快速通道区域对质量和有效性结果的影响:中东急诊科视角
BMC Emerg Med. 2009 Jun 17;9:11. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-9-11.