• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Factors associated with research wrongdoing in Nigeria.尼日利亚与科研不当行为相关的因素。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2012 Dec;7(5):15-24. doi: 10.1525/jer.2012.7.5.15.
2
Witnesses to research wrongdoing.科研不当行为的举报人
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2012 Dec;7(5):3-14. doi: 10.1525/jer.2012.7.5.3.
3
Prevalence of scientific misconduct among a group of researchers in Nigeria.尼日利亚一组研究人员中科学不端行为的流行率。
Dev World Bioeth. 2013 Dec;13(3):149-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2012.00339.x. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
4
Self-plagiarism and textual recycling: legitimate forms of research misconduct.自我剽窃与文本重复利用:研究不端行为的合理形式。
Account Res. 2014;21(3):176-97. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2014.848071.
5
Science ethics education part II: changes in attitude toward scientific fraud among medical researchers after a short course in science ethics.科学伦理教育第二部分:医学研究人员在参加短期科学伦理课程后对科研欺诈态度的转变
J BUON. 2012 Apr-Jun;17(2):391-5.
6
Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication.预防科研与出版领域不当行为并促进诚信的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 4;4(4):MR000038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000038.pub2.
7
Scientific misconduct as a dilemma for nursing.科学不端行为:护理领域面临的困境
Image J Nurs Sch. 1992 Spring;24(1):51-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1992.tb00699.x.
8
A proposed research misconduct policy for universities and postgraduate colleges in developing countries.一项针对发展中国家大学和研究生院校的拟议研究不当行为政策。
Niger Postgrad Med J. 2020 Jul-Sep;27(3):250-258. doi: 10.4103/npmj.npmj_51_20.
9
[Quality and integrity in the production and publication of scientific results: data trimming, manipulation and (self) plagiarism].科学成果产出与发表中的质量和诚信:数据删减、操纵及(自我)剽窃
Herz. 2014 Aug;39(5):551-7. doi: 10.1007/s00059-014-4120-3.
10
Scientific dishonesty--questionnaire to doctoral students in Sweden.科学不端行为——对瑞典博士生的问卷调查。
J Med Ethics. 2010 May;36(5):315-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.033654. Epub 2010 May 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Strengthening Research Ethics Capacity in West Africa, 2015-2024.2015 - 2024年加强西非的研究伦理能力
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2025 Jun 30:15562646251335076. doi: 10.1177/15562646251335076.
2
Magnitude and Factors Associated with Research Misconduct at a Public University in Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Survey.埃塞俄比亚一所公立大学研究不端行为的规模及相关因素:一项横断面调查。
F1000Res. 2025 Feb 20;14:111. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.159997.2. eCollection 2025.
3
Plagiarism in Publications: All about Being Fair!出版物中的剽窃行为:一切关乎公平!
Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2025 Jan 9;35(Suppl 1):S36-S45. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1791745. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
RESEARCH WRONGDOING AMONG MEDICAL TRAINEES IN NIGERIA.尼日利亚医学实习生中的研究不当行为。
Ann Ib Postgrad Med. 2022 Jun;20(1):72-74.
5
Fostering research integrity in sub-Saharan Africa: challenges, opportunities, and recommendations.促进撒哈拉以南非洲地区的研究诚信:挑战、机遇与建议。
Pan Afr Med J. 2022 Dec 7;43:182. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2022.43.182.37804. eCollection 2022.
6
Construction and Validation of the Research Misconduct Scale for Social Science University Students.社会科学专业大学生研究不端行为量表的构建与验证
Front Psychol. 2022 May 9;13:859466. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.859466. eCollection 2022.
7
Reliability and validation of an attitude scale regarding responsible conduct in research.研究行为负责任态度量表的信度和效度。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 16;17(3):e0265392. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265392. eCollection 2022.
8
Rethinking success, integrity, and culture in research (part 2) - a multi-actor qualitative study on problems of science.重新思考研究中的成功、诚信与文化(第二部分)——关于科学问题的多主体定性研究
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2021 Jan 14;6(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s41073-020-00105-z.
9
Perceptions of occurrence of research misconduct and related factors among Kenyan investigators engaged in HIV research.肯尼亚从事艾滋病病毒研究的调查人员对研究不当行为发生情况及相关因素的认知。
Account Res. 2020 Aug;27(6):372-389. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2020.1759425. Epub 2020 May 13.
10
A Cross-Sectional Survey Study to Assess Prevalence and Attitudes Regarding Research Misconduct among Investigators in the Middle East.一项横断面调查研究,旨在评估中东地区研究人员中科研不端行为的发生率及态度。
J Acad Ethics. 2018 Mar;16(1):71-87. doi: 10.1007/s10805-017-9295-9. Epub 2017 Oct 13.

本文引用的文献

1
The development of a taxonomy of wrongdoing in medical practice and research.医疗实践和研究中不当行为的分类法的发展。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Jan;42(1):89-98. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.08.027.
2
The role of Cochrane review authors in exposing research and publication misconduct.考克兰系统评价作者在揭露研究和出版不当行为中的作用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Dec 8;2011(12):ED000015. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000015.
3
MMR scare. Robust procedures for research conduct are needed.麻疹、腮腺炎和风疹恐慌。需要有健全的研究实施程序。
BMJ. 2011 Feb 8;342:d805. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d805.
4
International perspectives on plagiarism and considerations for teaching international trainees.国际视角下的剽窃问题及对国际学员教学的思考。
Urol Oncol. 2011 Jan-Feb;29(1):104-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.09.014.
5
Educational approaches for discouraging plagiarism.教育手段以杜绝抄袭。
Urol Oncol. 2011 Jan-Feb;29(1):100-3. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.11.014.
6
Combating unethical publications with plagiarism detection services.利用剽窃检测服务打击不道德的出版物。
Urol Oncol. 2011 Jan-Feb;29(1):95-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.09.016.
7
Do pressures to publish increase scientists' bias? An empirical support from US States Data.发表压力会增加科学家的偏见吗?来自美国各州数据的实证支持。
PLoS One. 2010 Apr 21;5(4):e10271. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010271.
8
Curriculum guide for research ethics workshops for countries in the Middle East.中东国家研究伦理研讨会课程指南。
Dev World Bioeth. 2010 Aug;10(2):70-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2009.00261.x. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
9
How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data.有多少科学家伪造和篡改研究数据?对调查数据的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2009 May 29;4(5):e5738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005738.
10
The history, purpose, and future of instruction in the responsible conduct of research.科研行为规范教学的历史、目的及未来。
Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):829-34. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7d4d.

尼日利亚与科研不当行为相关的因素。

Factors associated with research wrongdoing in Nigeria.

作者信息

Adeleye Omokhoa A, Adebamowo Clement A

机构信息

Department of Community Health, University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria.

出版信息

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2012 Dec;7(5):15-24. doi: 10.1525/jer.2012.7.5.15.

DOI:10.1525/jer.2012.7.5.15
PMID:23324199
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3619034/
Abstract

Concerns about research wrongdoing in biomedical research are growing in developing countries, where research ethics training and research regulatory systems are just emerging. In a first-time study in Africa, medical/dental researchers (N = 132) in two states in Nigeria were interviewed on a wide range of research wrongdoings and potential predictors. Using multivariate logistic regression, significant predictors of research wrongdoing were identified. Some 22.0% admitted to at least one of fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism, the predictors of which were knowledge gaps in research ethics and pressure to publish enough papers for promotion. Acknowledging inadequate knowledge of research ethics was a predictor of admitting a wrongdoing. Systems that support ethical research, including skilled training and funding, are recommended.

摘要

在发展中国家,对生物医学研究中科研不当行为的担忧日益增加,而这些国家的研究伦理培训和研究监管体系才刚刚起步。在非洲的一项首次研究中,对尼日利亚两个州的132名医学/牙科研究人员就广泛的科研不当行为和潜在预测因素进行了访谈。使用多变量逻辑回归分析,确定了科研不当行为的重要预测因素。约22.0%的人承认至少存在伪造、篡改和剽窃行为之一,其预测因素是研究伦理方面的知识差距以及为晋升发表足够论文的压力。承认对研究伦理知识不足是承认有不当行为的一个预测因素。建议建立支持伦理研究的体系,包括提供专业培训和资金。