• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外科医生报告与重症监护医生在术后治疗目标上存在冲突。

Surgeon-reported conflict with intensivists about postoperative goals of care.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2013 Jan;148(1):29-35. doi: 10.1001/jamasurgery.2013.403.

DOI:10.1001/jamasurgery.2013.403
PMID:23324837
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3624604/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine surgeons' experiences of conflict with intensivists and nurses about goals of care for their postoperative patients.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional incentivized US mail-based survey.

SETTING

Private and academic surgical practices.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 2100 vascular, neurologic, and cardiothoracic surgeons.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Surgeon-reported rates of conflict with intensivists and nurses about goals of care for patients with poor postsurgical outcomes.

RESULTS

The adjusted response rate was 55.6%. Forty-three percent of surgeons reported sometimes or always experiencing conflict about postoperative goals of care with intensivists, and 43% reported conflict with nurses. Younger surgeons reported higher rates of conflict than older surgeons with both intensivists (57% vs 32%; P = .001) and nurses (48% vs 33%; P = .001). Surgeons practicing in closed intensive care units reported more frequent conflict than those practicing in open intensive care units (60% vs 41%; P = .005). On multivariate analysis, the odds of reporting conflict with intensivists were 2.5 times higher for surgeons with fewer years of experience compared with their older colleagues (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.6-3.8) and 70% higher for reporting conflict with nurses (odds ratio, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.6). The odds of reporting conflict with intensivists about goals of postoperative care were 40% lower for surgeons who primarily managed their intensive care unit patients than for those who worked in a closed unit (odds ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.40-0.96).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons regularly experience conflict with critical care clinicians about goals of care for patients with poor postoperative outcomes. Higher rates of conflict are associated with less experience and working in a closed intensive care unit.

摘要

目的

探讨外科医生与重症监护医师和护士在术后患者治疗目标方面发生冲突的经历。

设计

横断面激励性美国邮件调查。

设置

私人和学术外科实践。

参与者

共 2100 名血管、神经和心胸外科医生。

主要观察指标

外科医生报告的与重症监护医师和护士在术后治疗目标方面发生冲突的发生率,这些患者的术后结局较差。

结果

调整后的应答率为 55.6%。43%的外科医生报告说,他们有时或经常与重症监护医师就术后治疗目标发生冲突,43%的外科医生报告说与护士发生冲突。与重症监护医师(57%比 32%;P =.001)和护士(48%比 33%;P =.001)相比,年轻的外科医生比年长的外科医生报告冲突的频率更高。在封闭的重症监护病房工作的外科医生比在开放的重症监护病房工作的外科医生报告更多的冲突(60%比 41%;P =.005)。多变量分析显示,与经验更丰富的同事相比,经验较少的外科医生报告与重症监护医师发生冲突的可能性高 2.5 倍(比值比,2.5;95%置信区间,1.6-3.8),报告与护士发生冲突的可能性高 70%(比值比,1.7;95%置信区间,1.1-2.6)。与主要管理重症监护病房患者的外科医生相比,在封闭病房工作的外科医生报告与重症监护医师就术后治疗目标发生冲突的可能性低 40%(比值比,0.60;95%置信区间,0.40-0.96)。

结论

外科医生经常与重症监护临床医生就术后结局较差的患者的治疗目标发生冲突。更高的冲突率与经验不足和在封闭的重症监护病房工作有关。

相似文献

1
Surgeon-reported conflict with intensivists about postoperative goals of care.外科医生报告与重症监护医生在术后治疗目标上存在冲突。
JAMA Surg. 2013 Jan;148(1):29-35. doi: 10.1001/jamasurgery.2013.403.
2
Women Surgeons' Experiences of Interprofessional Workplace Conflict.女性外科医生的跨专业工作场所冲突体验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2019843. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.19843.
3
Conflict in the intensive care unit: Nursing advocacy and surgical agency.重症监护病房中的冲突:护理倡导与外科干预
Nurs Ethics. 2018 Feb;25(1):69-79. doi: 10.1177/0969733016638144. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
4
Intensivists' Religiosity and Perceived Conflict During a Simulated ICU Family Meeting.模拟重症监护病房家属会议期间重症监护医生的宗教信仰与感知到的冲突
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Mar;59(3):687-693.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.10.020. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
5
Conflict Management Strategies in the ICU Differ Between Palliative Care Specialists and Intensivists.重症监护病房(ICU)中姑息治疗专家和重症监护医生的冲突管理策略存在差异。
Crit Care Med. 2016 May;44(5):934-42. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001583.
6
Canadian survey of the use of sedatives, analgesics, and neuromuscular blocking agents in critically ill patients.加拿大危重症患者镇静剂、镇痛药和神经肌肉阻滞剂使用情况调查。
Crit Care Med. 2006 Feb;34(2):374-80. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000196830.61965.f1.
7
Internists' and intensivists' roles in intensive care admission decisions: a qualitative study.内科医生和重症监护医生在重症监护入院决策中的角色:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 8;18(1):620. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3438-6.
8
Documentation of best interest by intensivists: a retrospective study in an Ontario critical care unit.重症监护医生记录最佳利益:安大略省重症监护病房的回顾性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2010 Feb 10;11:1. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-11-1.
9
Surgical intensive care unit clinician estimates of the adequacy of communication regarding patient prognosis.外科重症监护病房临床医生对患者预后沟通充分性的评估。
Crit Care. 2010;14(6):R218. doi: 10.1186/cc9346. Epub 2010 Nov 29.
10
Communication and Culture in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit: Boundary Production and the Improvement of Patient Care.外科重症监护病房中的沟通与文化:边界生成与患者护理的改善
Qual Health Res. 2016 Jun;26(7):895-906. doi: 10.1177/1049732315609901. Epub 2015 Oct 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinicians' Perceptions About Institutional Factors in Moral Distress Related to Potentially Nonbeneficial Treatments.临床医生对与潜在无效治疗相关的道德困扰中机构因素的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2516089. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.16089.
2
Criteria For Agreement When Conducting Local Consensus Discussions: A Qualitative Study.进行地方共识讨论时的共识标准:一项定性研究。
J Healthc Leadersh. 2025 May 5;17:159-172. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S522784. eCollection 2025.
3
Conflict Management in Nursing: Analyzing Styles, Strategies, and Influencing Factors: A Systematic Review.护理中的冲突管理:分析风格、策略及影响因素:一项系统综述
Nurs Rep. 2024 Dec 23;14(4):4173-4192. doi: 10.3390/nursrep14040304.
4
A closed surgical intensive care unit organization improves cardiac surgical patient outcomes.封闭式外科重症监护病房组织模式可改善心脏外科手术患者的预后。
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Feb 29;16(2):1262-1269. doi: 10.21037/jtd-22-1471. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
5
Defining Intensivists: A Retrospective Analysis of the Published Studies in the United States, 2010-2020.定义重症医学专家:2010-2020 年美国发表的研究回顾分析。
Crit Care Med. 2024 Feb 1;52(2):223-236. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005984. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
6
Effect of Perioperative Palliative Care on Health-Related Quality of Life Among Patients Undergoing Surgery for Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.围手术期姑息治疗对癌症手术患者健康相关生活质量的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2314660. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.14660.
7
A framework to identify ethical concerns with ML-guided care workflows: a case study of mortality prediction to guide advance care planning.一种用于识别机器学习指导下的护理工作流程中的伦理问题的框架:以死亡预测指导预立医疗照护计划为例。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Apr 19;30(5):819-827. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad022.
8
The Enneagram and its application in medical education.九型人格及其在医学教育中的应用。
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2022 Oct 19;36(1):54-58. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2022.2132591. eCollection 2023.
9
Understanding the Nature and Sources of Conflict Among Healthcare Professionals in Nigeria: A Qualitative Study.了解尼日利亚医疗保健专业人员之间冲突的性质和根源:一项定性研究。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022 Sep 7;15:1979-1995. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S374201. eCollection 2022.
10
Commentary: Thoracic intensive care unit readmissions-glass half full or half empty?评论:胸科重症监护病房再入院——是半满还是半空?
JTCVS Open. 2022 Feb 12;9:291-292. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2022.02.012. eCollection 2022 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of surgeon error in withdrawal of postoperative life support.外科医生在术后停止生命支持中的失误作用。
Ann Surg. 2012 Jul;256(1):10-5. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182580de5.
2
Use of advance directives for high-risk operations: a national survey of surgeons.高危手术中使用预先指示的情况:一项针对外科医生的全国性调查。
Ann Surg. 2012 Mar;255(3):418-23. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31823b6782.
3
Cardiothoracic surgeon management of postoperative cardiac critical care.心胸外科医生对术后心脏重症监护的管理。
Arch Surg. 2011 Nov;146(11):1253-60. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.298.
4
Conflicts and communication gaps in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房中的冲突和沟通障碍。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2010 Dec;16(6):654-65. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32834044f0.
5
Redefining the "planning" in advance care planning: preparing for end-of-life decision making.重新定义预先医疗照护计划中的“计划”:为临终决策做准备。
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Aug 17;153(4):256-61. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-4-201008170-00008.
6
Physician attitudes regarding advance directives for high-risk surgical patients: a qualitative analysis.医师对高风险手术患者预先指示的态度:定性分析。
Surgery. 2010 Aug;148(2):209-16. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.05.020. Epub 2010 Jun 26.
7
A literature review of conflict communication causes, costs, benefits and interventions in nursing.护理冲突沟通的原因、成本、收益和干预措施的文献综述。
J Nurs Manag. 2010 Mar;18(2):145-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01061.x.
8
Surgical "buy-in": the contractual relationship between surgeons and patients that influences decisions regarding life-supporting therapy.手术“认可”:指外科医生和患者之间的契约关系,这种关系影响着有关生命支持治疗的决策。
Crit Care Med. 2010 Mar;38(3):843-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181cc466b.
9
Physician communication with families in the ICU: evidence-based strategies for improvement.重症监护病房中医生与家属的沟通:基于证据的改进策略。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009 Dec;15(6):569-77. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e328332f524.
10
Conflicts in the ICU: perspectives of administrators and clinicians.重症监护病房的冲突:管理人员和临床医生的观点。
Intensive Care Med. 2009 Dec;35(12):2068-77. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1639-5. Epub 2009 Sep 15.