National Cannabis Prevention and Information Centre, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53187. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053187. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
A systematic review of primary prevention was conducted for cannabis use outcomes in youth and young adults. The aim of the review was to develop a comprehensive understanding of prevention programming by assessing universal, targeted, uni-modal, and multi-modal approaches as well as individual program characteristics. Twenty-eight articles, representing 25 unique studies, identified from eight electronic databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, ERIC, PsycINFO, DRUG, EBM Reviews, and Project CORK), were eligible for inclusion. Results indicated that primary prevention programs can be effective in reducing cannabis use in youth populations, with statistically significant effect sizes ranging from trivial (0.07) to extremely large (5.26), with the majority of significant effect sizes being trivial to small. Given that the preponderance of significant effect sizes were trivial to small and that percentages of statistically significant and non-statistically significant findings were often equivalent across program type and individual components, the effectiveness of primary prevention for cannabis use should be interpreted with caution. Universal multi-modal programs appeared to outperform other program types (i.e, universal uni-modal, targeted multi-modal, targeted unimodal). Specifically, universal multi-modal programs that targeted early adolescents (10-13 year olds), utilised non-teacher or multiple facilitators, were short in duration (10 sessions or less), and implemented boosters sessions were associated with large median effect sizes. While there were studies in these areas that contradicted these results, the results highlight the importance of assessing the interdependent relationship of program components and program types. Finally, results indicated that the overall quality of included studies was poor, with an average quality rating of 4.64 out of 9. Thus, further quality research and reporting and the development of new innovative programs are required.
对青少年和年轻人的大麻使用结果进行了一次针对初级预防的系统综述。本次综述的目的是通过评估通用、有针对性、单一模式和多模式方法以及单个项目的特征,全面了解预防计划。从八个电子数据库(EMBASE、MEDLINE、CINAHL、ERIC、PsycINFO、DRUG、EBM Reviews 和 Project CORK)中确定了 28 篇文章,代表了 25 项独特的研究,这些文章符合纳入标准。结果表明,初级预防方案可有效减少青少年的大麻使用,其统计学上显著的效果量范围从微不足道(0.07)到非常大(5.26),大多数显著效果量都是微不足道到小。鉴于大多数显著效果量都是微不足道到小,而且在程序类型和单个组件方面,统计学上显著和非统计学上显著的发现的百分比往往相当,因此,大麻使用的初级预防效果应该谨慎解释。通用多模式方案似乎优于其他方案类型(即通用单一模式、有针对性的多模式、有针对性的单一模式)。具体而言,针对早期青少年(10-13 岁)、使用非教师或多个促进者、持续时间短(10 次或更少)且实施强化课程的通用多模式方案与较大的中位数效果量相关。虽然在这些领域有研究结果与这些结果相矛盾,但结果强调了评估方案组成部分和方案类型的相互依存关系的重要性。最后,结果表明,纳入研究的总体质量较差,平均质量评分为 9 分中的 4.64 分。因此,需要进一步进行高质量的研究和报告,并开发新的创新方案。