Hanley Gregory P
Western New England University.
Behav Anal Pract. 2012 Summer;5(1):54-72. doi: 10.1007/BF03391818.
Hundreds of studies have shown the efficacy of treatments for problem behavior based on an understanding of its function. Assertions regarding the legitimacy of different types of functional assessment vary substantially across published articles, and best practices regarding the functional assessment process are sometimes difficult to cull from the empirical literature or from published discussions of the behavioral assessment process. A number of myths regarding the functional assessment process, which appear to be pervasive within different behavior-analytic research and practice communities, will be reviewed in the context of an attempt to develop new lore regarding the functional assessment process. Frequently described obstacles to implementing a critical aspect of the functional assessment process, the functional analysis, will be reviewed in the context of solutions for overcoming them. Finally, the aspects of the functional assessment process that should be exported to others versus those features that should remain the sole technological property of behavior analysts will be discussed.
数百项研究表明,基于对问题行为功能的理解,针对该行为的治疗方法是有效的。不同类型功能评估的合法性在已发表的文章中差异很大,关于功能评估过程的最佳实践有时很难从实证文献或行为评估过程的已发表讨论中挑选出来。在试图发展关于功能评估过程的新经验的背景下,将对一些在不同行为分析研究和实践群体中似乎普遍存在的关于功能评估过程的误解进行审视。经常被描述为实施功能评估过程关键环节(即功能分析)的障碍,将在克服这些障碍的解决方案背景下进行审视。最后,将讨论功能评估过程中应向他人推广的方面与那些应保留为行为分析师专有技术的特征。