Wood M E, Flynn B S, Stockdale A
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.
Public Health Genomics. 2013;16(3):75-82. doi: 10.1159/000343790. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
Risk stratification based on family history is a feature of screening guidelines for a number of cancers and referral guidelines for genetic counseling/testing for cancer risk.
Our aim was to describe primary care physician perceptions of their role in managing cancer risk based on family history.
Structured interviews were conducted by a medical anthropologist with primary care physicians in 3 settings in 2 north-eastern states. Transcripts were systematically analyzed by a research team to identify major themes expressed by participants.
Forty interviews were conducted from May 2003 through May 2006. Physicians provided a diversity of views on roles in management of cancer risk based on family history, management practices and patient responses to risk information. They also provided a wide range of perspectives on criteria used for referral to specialists, types of specialists referred to and expected management roles for referred patients.
Some primary care physicians appeared to make effective use of family history information for cancer risk management, but many in this sample did not. Increased focus on efficient assessment tools based on recognized guidelines, accessible guides to management options, and patient education and decision aids may be useful directions to facilitate broader use of family history information for cancer risk management.
基于家族史的风险分层是多种癌症筛查指南以及癌症风险遗传咨询/检测转诊指南的一项特征。
我们的目的是描述初级保健医生对于其在基于家族史管理癌症风险中所扮演角色的看法。
一位医学人类学家对东北部两个州三个地区的初级保健医生进行了结构化访谈。一个研究团队对访谈记录进行了系统分析,以确定参与者表达的主要主题。
2003年5月至2006年5月期间共进行了40次访谈。医生们对基于家族史的癌症风险管理中的角色、管理实践以及患者对风险信息的反应提供了多样的观点。他们还对用于转诊至专科医生的标准、转诊的专科医生类型以及转诊患者预期的管理角色提供了广泛的见解。
一些初级保健医生似乎有效地利用家族史信息进行癌症风险管理,但该样本中的许多医生并非如此。更多地关注基于公认指南的高效评估工具、易于获取的管理选项指南以及患者教育和决策辅助工具,可能是促进更广泛地利用家族史信息进行癌症风险管理的有益方向。