• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随着时间的推移,癌症家族史的临床相关变化。

Clinically relevant changes in family history of cancer over time.

机构信息

University of California–Irvine, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 2011 Jul 13;306(2):172-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.955.

DOI:10.1001/jama.2011.955
PMID:21750294
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3367662/
Abstract

CONTEXT

Knowledge of family cancer history is important for assessing cancer risk and guiding screening recommendations.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify how often throughout adulthood clinically significant changes occur in cancer family history that would result in recommendations for earlier or intense screening.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Descriptive study examining baseline and follow-up family history data from participants in the Cancer Genetics Network (CGN), a US national population-based cancer registry, between 1999 and 2009.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults with a personal history, family history, or both of cancer enrolled in the CGN through population-based cancer registries. Retrospective colorectal, breast, and prostate cancer screening-specific analyses included 9861, 2547, and 1817 participants, respectively; prospective analyses included 1533, 617, and 163 participants, respectively. Median follow-up was 8 years (range, 0-11 years). Screening-specific analyses excluded participants with the cancer of interest.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Percentage of individuals with clinically significant family histories and rate of change over 2 periods: (1) retrospectively, from birth until CGN enrollment and (2) prospectively, from enrollment to last follow-up.

RESULTS

Retrospective analysis revealed that the percentages of participants who met criteria for high-risk screening based on family history at ages 30 and 50 years, respectively, were as follows: for colorectal cancer, 2.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8%-2.4%) and 7.1% (95% CI, 6.5%-7.6%); for breast cancer, 7.2% (95% CI, 6.1%-8.4%) and 11.4% (95% CI, 10.0%-12.8%); and for prostate cancer, 0.9% (95% CI, 0.5%-1.4%) and 2.0% (95% CI, 1.4%-2.7%). In prospective analysis, the numbers of participants who newly met criteria for high-risk screening based on family history per 100 persons followed up for 20 years were 2 (95% CI, 0-7) for colorectal cancer, 6 (95% CI, 2-13) for breast cancer, and 8 (95% CI, 3-16) for prostate cancer. The rate of change in cancer family history was similar for colorectal and breast cancer between the 2 analyses.

CONCLUSION

Clinically relevant family history of colorectal, breast, and prostate cancer that would result in recommendations for earlier or intense cancer screening increases between ages 30 and 50 years, although the absolute rate is low for prostate cancer.

摘要

背景

了解家族癌症史对于评估癌症风险和指导筛查建议很重要。

目的

量化在成年期内癌症家族史发生何种程度的变化,才会导致更早或更强烈的筛查建议。

设计与设置

描述性研究,对 1999 年至 2009 年间参加癌症遗传学网络(Cancer Genetics Network,CGN)的参与者的基线和随访家族史数据进行了分析,CGN 是一个美国全国性的基于人群的癌症登记处。

参与者

通过基于人群的癌症登记处参加 CGN 的患有癌症的个人、家族史或兼有癌症的成年人。回顾性的结直肠癌、乳腺癌和前列腺癌筛查特异性分析分别纳入了 9861、2547 和 1817 名参与者;前瞻性分析分别纳入了 1533、617 和 163 名参与者。中位随访时间为 8 年(范围为 0-11 年)。筛查特异性分析排除了患有目标癌症的参与者。

主要观察指标

根据家族史确定有临床意义的家族史的个体百分比和在 2 个时期内的变化率:(1)回顾性地,从出生到 CGN 入组;(2)前瞻性地,从入组到最后一次随访。

结果

回顾性分析显示,分别在 30 岁和 50 岁时,符合家族史高危筛查标准的参与者百分比如下:结直肠癌为 2.1%(95%置信区间[CI],1.8%-2.4%)和 7.1%(95% CI,6.5%-7.6%);乳腺癌为 7.2%(95% CI,6.1%-8.4%)和 11.4%(95% CI,10.0%-12.8%);前列腺癌为 0.9%(95% CI,0.5%-1.4%)和 2.0%(95% CI,1.4%-2.7%)。在前瞻性分析中,在每 100 例随访 20 年的参与者中,根据家族史新出现的高危筛查标准的参与者人数为结直肠癌为 2(95% CI,0-7),乳腺癌为 6(95% CI,2-13),前列腺癌为 8(95% CI,3-16)。在这两种分析中,结直肠癌和乳腺癌的癌症家族史变化率相似。

结论

结直肠癌、乳腺癌和前列腺癌的临床相关家族史,会导致更早或更强烈的癌症筛查建议,这种变化在 30 岁至 50 岁之间发生,尽管前列腺癌的绝对发生率较低。

相似文献

1
Clinically relevant changes in family history of cancer over time.随着时间的推移,癌症家族史的临床相关变化。
JAMA. 2011 Jul 13;306(2):172-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.955.
2
Screening men for prostate and colorectal cancer in the United States: does practice reflect the evidence?在美国对男性进行前列腺癌和结直肠癌筛查:实际做法是否符合证据?
JAMA. 2003 Mar 19;289(11):1414-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.11.1414.
3
Evaluating Family History Links between Breast Cancer and Prostate Cancer Among PLCO Trial Participants.评估前列腺、肺癌、结直肠癌和卵巢癌(PLCO)试验参与者中乳腺癌与前列腺癌之间的家族史关联。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2020 Aug;20(4):300-306. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2020.03.005. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
4
A randomized trial to increase colonoscopy screening in members of high-risk families in the colorectal cancer family registry and cancer genetics network.一项旨在提高结直肠癌家族登记处和癌症遗传学网络中高危家族成员结肠镜检查筛查率的随机试验。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Apr;23(4):601-10. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-1085. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
5
Prevalence of family history of breast, colorectal, prostate, and lung cancer in a population-based study.一项基于人群的研究中乳腺癌、结直肠癌、前列腺癌和肺癌家族史的患病率。
Public Health Genomics. 2010;13(7-8):495-503. doi: 10.1159/000294469. Epub 2010 Apr 9.
6
Breast, colorectal, and skin cancer screening practices and family history of cancer in U.S. women.美国女性的乳腺癌、结直肠癌和皮肤癌筛查情况及癌症家族史
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2007 May;16(4):526-34. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2006.0108.
7
Calculating the Starting Age for Screening in Relatives of Patients With Colorectal Cancer Based on Data From Large Nationwide Data Sets.基于全国大型数据集的数据计算结直肠癌患者亲属的起始筛查年龄
Gastroenterology. 2020 Jul;159(1):159-168.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.03.063. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
8
Implications of false-positive results for future cancer screenings.假阳性结果对未来癌症筛查的影响。
Cancer. 2018 Jun 1;124(11):2390-2398. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31271. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
9
Association of Cancer Screening Deficit in the United States With the COVID-19 Pandemic.美国癌症筛查不足与新冠疫情的关联。
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Jun 1;7(6):878-884. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.0884.
10
Association of Race and Socioeconomic Status With Colorectal Cancer Screening, Colorectal Cancer Risk, and Mortality in Southern US Adults.种族和社会经济地位与美国南部成年人结直肠癌筛查、结直肠癌风险和死亡率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1917995. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.17995.

引用本文的文献

1
A Cluster Randomized Trial of a Family Health History Platform to Identify and Manage Patients at Increased Risk for Colorectal Cancer.一项家庭健康史平台的群组随机试验,旨在识别和管理结直肠癌风险增加的患者。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 May;38(6):1375-1383. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07787-9. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
2
Prevalence of Americans reporting a family history of cancer indicative of increased cancer risk: Estimates from the 2015 National Health Interview Survey.美国人报告家族癌症史的比例表明癌症风险增加:2015 年国家健康访谈调查的估计。
Prev Med. 2022 Jun;159:107062. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107062. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
3
Workup and Clinical Assessment for Allergen Immunotherapy Candidates.过敏原免疫治疗候选者的检查和临床评估。
Cells. 2022 Feb 14;11(4):653. doi: 10.3390/cells11040653.
4
Association of Family History with the Development of Breast Cancer: A Cohort Study of 129,374 Women in KoGES Data.家族史与乳腺癌发展的关联:基于 KoGES 数据的 129374 名女性的队列研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 13;18(12):6409. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126409.
5
Comparing 5-Year and Lifetime Risks of Breast Cancer using the Prospective Family Study Cohort.使用前瞻性家族研究队列比较乳腺癌的 5 年和终身风险。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Jun 1;113(6):785-791. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa178.
6
Factors Associated With Cancer Family History Communication Between African American Men and Their Relatives.非裔美国男性与其亲属之间癌症家族史沟通的相关因素。
J Mens Stud. 2013 Spring;21(2):97-111. doi: 10.3149/jms.2102.97. Epub 2013 Mar 1.
7
Clinical and Genetic Characteristics of Colorectal Cancer in Persons under 50 Years of Age: A Review.50 岁以下人群结直肠癌的临床和遗传特征:综述。
Dig Dis Sci. 2019 Nov;64(11):3059-3065. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05644-0. Epub 2019 May 4.
8
Legacies and Relationships: Diverse Social Networks and BRCA1/2 Risk Management Decisions and Actions.遗产与关系:不同的社交网络与 BRCA1/2 风险管理决策和行为。
J Fam Nurs. 2019 Feb;25(1):28-53. doi: 10.1177/1074840718815844. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
9
The Role of Palliative Medicine in Assessing Hereditary Cancer Risk.姑息医学在评估遗传性癌症风险中的作用。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Dec;35(12):1490-1497. doi: 10.1177/1049909118778865. Epub 2018 May 29.
10
Family history of prostate and colorectal cancer and risk of colorectal cancer in the Women's health initiative.女性健康倡议中的前列腺癌和结直肠癌家族史与结直肠癌风险
BMC Cancer. 2017 Dec 13;17(1):848. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3873-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Population prevalence of familial cancer and common hereditary cancer syndromes. The 2005 California Health Interview Survey.家族性癌症和常见遗传性癌症综合征的人群流行率。2005 年加利福尼亚健康访谈调查。
Genet Med. 2010 Nov;12(11):726-35. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181f30e9e.
2
Effects of prostate-specific antigen testing on familial prostate cancer risk estimates.前列腺特异性抗原检测对家族性前列腺癌风险评估的影响。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Sep 8;102(17):1336-43. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq265. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
3
Prospective multicenter cohort study to refine management recommendations for women at elevated familial risk of breast cancer: the EVA trial.前瞻性多中心队列研究,旨在为乳腺癌家族高风险女性的管理建议提供依据:EVA 试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 20;28(9):1450-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.0839. Epub 2010 Feb 22.
4
Genetic assessment of breast cancer risk in primary care practice.初级医疗实践中乳腺癌风险的基因评估。
Am J Med Genet A. 2009 Mar;149A(3):349-56. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32643.
5
Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer.系统评价:使用磁共振成像对乳腺癌高危女性进行筛查
Ann Intern Med. 2008 May 6;148(9):671-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-9-200805060-00007.
6
Collection and use of cancer family history in primary care.基层医疗中癌症家族史的收集与应用。
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007 Oct(159):1-84.
7
American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography.美国癌症协会关于以MRI作为乳房X线摄影辅助手段进行乳房筛查的指南。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2007 Mar-Apr;57(2):75-89. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.57.2.75.
8
Cancer risk assessment: examining the family physician's role.癌症风险评估:审视家庭医生的角色。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2006 Sep-Oct;19(5):468-77. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.19.5.468.
9
Cancer risk in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome: later age of onset.遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌综合征的癌症风险:发病年龄较晚。
Gastroenterology. 2005 Aug;129(2):415-21. doi: 10.1016/j.gastro.2005.05.011.
10
The Cancer Genetics Network: recruitment results and pilot studies.癌症遗传学网络:招募结果与试点研究。
Community Genet. 2003;6(3):171-7. doi: 10.1159/000078165.